On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 1:36 PM RadicalRose via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I may be wrong, but I interpret R1728 not as limiting the use of the word > "intend" to tabled actions, and my usage of "intend" in the quoted above > message achieves both "setting forth intent" as described by R478 and > "[indicating] intent to pay that fee" in R2579, and is therefore a valid > way of taking action. Although I will gladly restrict my usage of "intend" > to tabled actions in the future. > Rule 478 talks about "setting forth intent" in the context of performing an action "by announcement." Rule 2659 "Stamps" does not specify that purchasing stamps can be done by announcement, and CFJ 2112 found that "An action is only taken by announcement if the Rules define it as such."
