On 12/16/24 17:46, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote: > On 12/16/24 5:06 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: > >> On 12/15/24 16:45, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote: >>> 9197~ Mischief, ais523, Kate 1.5 The Game is Afoot >> PRESENT. "by an announcement" isn't defined; it should be "by >> announcement, clearly identifying [...]". > Rule 2201 uses very similar wording: > > When this happens, the publisher of the original document SHALL > (if e was required to publish that document) or SHOULD (otherwise) > do one of the following in a timely fashion, in an announcement > that clearly cites the claim of error: > > Granted, #2 in the subsequent list has "publish" in it (which covers the > same ground) -- but the others don't. >
None of those options in Rule 2201 are defining *new* actions, whereas this clause is. "Denying" the claim has its natural language meaning, "publish" is well-defined, and "initiate an inquiry case" is well-defined (except for "inquiry case", oops). -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
