Re: [SAtalk] Newbie queries, install and configuration

Hi, On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:44:14 +0200 "Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My query is this: Can I use SA if I am using Mozilla as my MTA to send > and receive my POP email ie no sendmail, qmail, fetchmail, just Mozilla > and sorting it into my local folders on Mozilla? Ye

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie queries, install and configuration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 17 January 2004 05:44, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote: > Hi all, > > My SPAM has reached an unprecedented level ie up to 50% SPAM and so I > have decided to install and investigate SA. I have been a member of the > mailing list for a littl

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Question: full list of headers?

Hello Rocky, Wednesday, January 14, 2004, 8:53:25 PM, you wrote: RO> I'm writing some custom rules and i am wondering if there is a list RO> somewhere of what parts of the header i can test? such as RO> header NO_REAL_NAME From =~ RO> header TO_HAS_SPACESTo:addr =~ First

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Andrew Cranson wrote: > Any idea if this is being implemented in an upcoming release? I know > spamassassin isn't 100% accurate, but it seems to be a much wanted feature > for SA to be able to delete suspected spam. It'd be even more ideal if a > preference could be set via my

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

ay, January 11, 2004 2:03 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server Any idea if this is being implemented in an upcoming release? I know spamassassin isn't 100% accurate, but it seems to be a much wanted feature for SA to be able to delete suspected spam. It'd be even

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:03:09PM -, Andrew Cranson wrote: > Any idea if this is being implemented in an upcoming release? I know Since SA can _ONLY_ tag mails, it will never be able to delete messages. If you want this functionality, you can have whatever calls SA to parse the headers and de

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

elongs. m/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Cranson Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 2:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server Any idea if this is being implemented in an upcoming release? I know sp

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

Any idea if this is being implemented in an upcoming release? I know spamassassin isn't 100% accurate, but it seems to be a much wanted feature for SA to be able to delete suspected spam. It'd be even more ideal if a preference could be set via mysql to set a delete threshold in addition to the sta

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

Any idea if this is being implemented in an upcoming release? I know spamassassin isn't 100% accurate, but it seems to be a much wanted feature for SA to be able to delete suspected spam. It'd be even more ideal if a preference could be set via mysql to set a delete threshold in addition to the sta

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 11 January 2004 07:35, Geoffrey Lane wrote: > I've setup my kmail to keep the mail on my isp's server, so that I can download them from my windows side or have the email on their webmail service to view at work. > my question, is there a wa

Re: [SAtalk] newbie: windows binary as auto spam

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 08 January 2004 12:05, Geoffrey Lane wrote: > score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 0.100 Try setting this to 10 or more. score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 10.00 Douglas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE//cHYSpWn8R0

RE: [SAtalk] newbie: windows binary as auto spam

You can change the score, yes, I infact, did the same thing. In the local.cf you put this line: score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 100 HTH Thanks, James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Lane Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:05 PM To

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Questions

Chip Paswater wrote: Hey Guys, I apologize if these questions are asked somewhere, but I did browse the FAQ and documentation and didn't see an answer. I have a good understanding of Razor v2, but I just started using SA. 1. When reporting spam via spamassassin -r, can I supply an mbox instead

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Questions

At 01:13 PM 11/7/2003, Chip Paswater wrote: Hey Guys, I apologize if these questions are asked somewhere, but I did browse the FAQ and documentation and didn't see an answer. I have a good understanding of Razor v2, but I just started using SA. 1. When reporting spam via spamassassin -r, can I s

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

-Original Message- From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:09 AM To: Howard Brazee; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie This should be a FAQ: Q. How do I get SpamAssassin to mark as spam all Window patch emails that include an executable? A

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

My e-mail provider uses Spam Assassin. Lately I have been getting about a thousand e-mails telling me to patch my Windows. I use MailWasher to delete these, as if I leave on vacation my in box gets too large for Outlook to handle. I let my provider know an they bumped Spam Assassin up to lev

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

At 10:08 AM 10/27/2003, Dan Kohn wrote: This should be a FAQ: Q. How do I get SpamAssassin to mark as spam all Window patch emails that include an executable? A. Add the following line to your user-prefs (normally ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs): score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 10 - dan And it

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

inal Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 08:49 To: Dan Kohn; Howard Brazee; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie At 10:08 AM 10/27/2003, Dan Kohn wrote: >This should be a FAQ: > >Q. How do I get SpamAssassin to mark as spam al

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:05:12 - "Giles Coochey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those emails are Viruses, not Spam - why not get some Anti Virus > Software? 1) AV software generally costs money. 2) You wipe out over 90% of the virus threat with negligible FPs by rejecting all Windows executables

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

Those emails are Viruses, not Spam - why not get some Anti Virus Software? -Original Message- From: Howard Brazee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 October 2003 14:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Newbie My e-mail provider uses Spam Assassin. Lately I have been getting abo

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

This should be a FAQ: Q. How do I get SpamAssassin to mark as spam all Window patch emails that include an executable? A. Add the following line to your user-prefs (normally ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs): score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 10 - dan -- Dan Kohn

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: Adding Rules To SpamAssassin

well for me the rule of MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 5 was working fine in 2.55 now in 2.60 it does not work and the email gets tag with 2.5 when my settings in user_prefs says it should be over 5 it appears 2.6 is ignoring my .spamassassin/user_prefs On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:48:55PM -0400, Joh

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie: Adding Rules To SpamAssassin

Robert: Thanks for the help. > Something like > > body RM_b_V-drug/V[Ii1\|[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i > but for the subject, right? Yes, this is along the lines of what I wanted since, at least my version of SA, has only a rudimentary test in the body, which does not of ourse address the Subject li

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: Adding Rules To SpamAssassin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello John, Friday, September 19, 2003, 8:59:47 AM, you wrote: JP> I am a real newbie on this stuff. SpamAssassin is provided on my JP> virtual server account at viaVerio and it's great. But it misses a JP> lot of spam related to that V-drug. I wan

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie rule submission for SILDENAFIL_GIF

Hi Rob, > -Original Message- > From: Bruce, Rob > I noticed a while ago a focused website dedicated to rule trading, > but now I can't find it. Do you guys know what I'm talking about? The SpamAssassin Custom Rule Emporium http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie rule submission for SILDENAFIL_GIF

On Sep 14, 2003 at 16:59, Bruce, Rob wrote: >I noticed a while ago a focused website dedicated to rule trading, but >now I can't find it. Do you guys know what I'm talking about? http://www.exit0.us/ ? -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.net/> All wiyht. Rho sritched mg kegtops awound ? --

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Orbital, Friday, August 22, 2003, 1:32:12 PM, you wrote: OO> Hello, OO> I am new to SA and would like to know if catching 160 spam from 8000 OO> mails in a day is normal or not? I suspect this is not normal so any OO> ideas where i should look

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie Spamd/Spamc

Liljemark To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21/08/03 12:41 Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Spamd/Spamc On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:30:00PM +0300, Céline REDON wrote: > *In Postfix , in /etc/postfix/master.cf > the last line calls the filter spamc.sh > filterunix - nn --

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Spamd/Spamc

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 06:34:00PM +0300, Céline REDON wrote: > yes I have added it today , but it doesnot change anything > smtps inet n - y - - smtpd -o > smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o co > ntent_filter=filter:dummy > > filter

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie Spamd/Spamc

-Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Hannu Liljemark Envoyé : jeudi 14 août 2003 06:54 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Spamd/Spamc On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:48:00PM +0300, Céline REDON wrote: > Mails are going thr

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Spamd/Spamc

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:30:00PM +0300, Céline REDON wrote: > *In Postfix , in /etc/postfix/master.cf > the last line calls the filter spamc.sh > filterunix - nn -- pipe > flags=Rq user=filter argv=/var/spool/filter/spamc.sh -f ${sender} -- > ${recipi

RE: [SAtalk] [newbie]systemwide bayes and files

> bayes_file_mode 0770 > bayes_path /path/to/bayes > > Ensure that your bayes files are owned by dupond and that they are in a > group which contains the user id that you wish to run sa-learn as. Thanks a lot for your's response. Can i ask you for white list /auto white list parameters ? Thanks

RE: [SAtalk] [newbie]systemwide bayes and files

This in your local cf Local.cf: bayes_file_mode 0770 bayes_path /path/to/bayes Ensure that your bayes files are owned by dupond and that they are in a group which contains the user id that you wish to run sa-learn as. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:09:00AM +0300, Bryan Jones wrote: > I have been all over the spamassassin.org site and that > seems to not have a lot of information. I have just > installed RedHat 9.0 and I am using that for my mail server. Before you get started, install all updates from RH9.0 errat

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie - Why no score for equal From: and To: address?

On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:26:06AM +0200, Carsten Engelmann wrote: > > I received several mails from jenny lips and they always have a header > like this: > > >>> > > From: "jenny lips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Time: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 07:21:38 +0800 > Subject: Lower your pa

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:35:38PM -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Well here's the scenario, (and no comments from the anti-windoze ) > we have a windows 2000 network > active directory etc.. I will be deploying an exchange server (free > for non-profits) a few macs here as well. > I cannot get

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie -- Help please.

Brain, Your problem seems to happen way before SpamAssassin would start to work, so this looks like a CGPSA plugin config problem to me. Better try to get help directly on the CGPSA List: https://tff.cs.caltech.edu:8100/Lists/cgpsa-discuss/List.html Cheers, Oliver. > Von: bbeers <[EMAIL PR

Re: [SAtalk] newbie sa-learn question.

Angel Gabriel wrote: Is it possible to have the attachemt only, piped into sa-learn ? I've set up an account called spam that has the foillowing .procmailrc: :0: spam.lock |/home/spam/process_spam.pl and the file /home/spam/process_spam.pl contains: --cut-- #!/usr/bin/

Re: [SAtalk] newbie sa-learn question.

At 10:45 AM 8/11/2003 -0400, Russell Premont wrote: setup an address that users could forward spam to, so I could then run sa-learn on the mail folder. My question is can I use sa-learn in this manner or will it also pick up the addresses that forwarded the mail to the spam account also? It won't p

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Spamd/Spamc

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:48:00PM +0300, Céline REDON wrote: > Mails are going through the whole plateform , but without > being changed at all.I think they are not getting through > SA How *exactly* do you call spamc from postfix? Are you using the content_filter hook and run a spamc.sh or

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

Jean-Paul,   It really depends on your environment.  I'm currently running a P-III 500 as my company's spam filter (2000 employees), but we're going to give it a "real server" now that its worth has been proven.   -- Benjamin Story Dot Foods, Inc.   -Original Message- F

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie - Why no score for equal From: and To: address?

Hi, I filter on the received line: received: from mokes [210.58.26.191] by gwdg.de with MailMXPro(2195.5766); The MailMXPro seems to be unique for some spam mails. I did not found this word in any other mail. Bye Klaus --- This SF.Net email

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

nt: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie I'd recommend baby steps.  Get linux installed and SA working as you want it.  Then do iptables...there's a zillion places to learn it and many example scripts too.  Then tackle content filtering.  Along

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 20:56, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Hi all > > I'm new to this, so bear with me, > > what kind of box do I need to load spamassasin on, and where can I get it. > > Note: I already downloaded the program spamassasin, just need to know where to get > the OS to utilize > >

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

07, 2003 4:31 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie I would suggest using RedHat as there are many HOWTO's for using it with SA.  You can either buy the RH CD's from a retailer or download them from the Internet.   -- Benjamin Story Dot Foods, Inc.   -Original

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

la/sa_rules.htm "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy Wonka -Original Message- From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 9:13 AM To: Ben

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

ay, August 07, 2003 4:31 PMTo: 'Jean-Paul Natola'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie I would suggest using RedHat as there are many HOWTO's for using it with SA.  You can either buy the RH CD's from a retailer or download them from the

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 9:13 AMTo: Ben Story; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Now that i have this info,  is there any kind of Content filter  that is linux based,  if so ,   can it run on the same box as SA?     - Origi

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

Save yourself some time. Read the fine how-to at http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html You'll have it set up on a box running OpenBSD and relaying mail into your existing mail server in an afternoon. Thanks, Jim = Jim O'Donald, MCSE,

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question

ah, great info, much thanks the goal would be to be able to "call" custom SA rules per domain abc.com --> /etc/mail/spamassassin/abc.local.cf xyz.com --> /etc/mail/spamassassin/xyz.local.cf and such On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 09:27, Matt Kettler wrote: At 01:01 PM 8/8/03 +, william f guyt

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

cds for the OS is that what I should use or >do I have other options? > >- Original Message - > >From: [1]Ben Story > >To: [2]'Jean-Paul Natola' ; >[3]'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > >Sent: Thursday

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

nal Message - From: Chris Santerre To: 'Jean-Paul Natola' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:12 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie That is PLENTY! :)  I'm running on 266 pentiums with 64!    Although Squid likes memory. The more the b

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie here...help with Courier MTA and Spam Assassin

Bill Long wrote: > Hi all, > > is there any documentation anywhere which explains how to set up Spam > Assassin using spamc and spamd with Courier MTA and maildrop? > > I tried reading up on the various man pages, but it's very confusing > to a novice. > > > thanks, > > bill Well, maybe easiest th

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

- From: Angel Gabriel To: Jean-Paul Natola Cc: Spam Assassin Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 20:56, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:> Hi all> > I'm new to  this, so bear with me, > >

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

Chris Santerre ; 'Jean-Paul Natola' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:53 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie I used to use an old 486 with 40 meg of ram running RH 7.3 as a firewall with iptables. Worked great 'til the scsi's diedjust reti

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question

At 01:01 PM 8/8/03 +, william f guyton jr wrote: Is their a configuration that allows SA to use unique local.cf for each domain passing thru a SA gateway? This is really a function of the tool that calls SA, and not SA itself. So you'd have to specify which tool you're using for that. As an

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:12:36AM -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Now that i have this info, is there any kind of Content filter that is linux > based, if so , > > can it run on the same box as SA? SA is a *fine* content filter! It can filter on the headers, of course, but also can filter

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

I have other options? - Original Message - From: Ben Story To: 'Jean-Paul Natola' ; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:03 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie Jean-Paul,   It really depends on your environment.  I

Re: [SAtalk] newbie sa-learn question.

Yes -- forwarding alters the mail headers, which will cause problems with learning. Russell Premont wrote: Our mail server controls mail for multiple domains. What I wanted to do is setup an address that users could forward spam to, so I could then run sa-learn on the mail folder. My question is

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 16:30, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > well we are tiny non-profit 40 internal 20 external email acts (60 > -total) > > I also NEED to know what OS to run it under , red hat? i have used > HP-UX for a few years at my old org, also where I can get the OS, > > I understand r

Re: [SAtalk] newbie sa-learn question.

Is it possible to have the attachemt only, piped into sa-learn ? On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:31, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 10:45 AM 8/11/2003 -0400, Russell Premont wrote: > >setup an address that users could forward spam to, so I could then run > >sa-learn on the mail folder. My question is can I u

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 3:30 PM To: Ben Story; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie   well we are tiny non-profit   40 internal  20 external email acts  (60 -total)   I also NEED to know what OS to run it under , red hat? i have used HP-UX for a few years at

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

On Aug 7, 2003 at 16:30, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: >I also NEED to know what OS to run it under , red hat? i have used >HP-UX for a few years at my old org, also where I can get the OS, >I understand red-hat is 4 cds for the OS is that what I should use or >do I have other options? I had zero trou

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

To: 'Jean-Paul Natola' ; Ben Story ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 8:41 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie Squid proxy server can do this.  You can run it on the same box as SA, but I don't recomend it. Not unless you have some good iptable (or ipc

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie - Why no score for equal From: and To: address?

> I filter on the received line: > > received: from mokes [210.58.26.191] by gwdg.de with > MailMXPro(2195.5766); > > The MailMXPro seems to be unique for some spam mails. I did not found > this word in any other mail. > I tried to make a rule based on this observation, but when I ran --lint, I r

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

-Paul Natola Cc: Spam Assassin Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 20:56, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:> Hi all> > I'm new to  this, so bear with me, > > what kind of box do I need to load spamassasin on,  and where

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie

386s and 486s!)   --- Chris -Original Message-From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:24 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie are 433 celerons w 128 ram  good enough,  we have a few of them left, One already has IPCO

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie - Why no score for equal From: and To: address?

>> received: from mokes [210.58.26.191] by gwdg.de with >> MailMXPro(2195.5766); >> >> The MailMXPro seems to be unique for some spam mails. I did not found >> this word in any other mail. >> >I tried to make a rule based on this observation, but when I >ran --lint, I received a "failed to parse l

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie trying to set SA up with postfix

Did you read the /etc/postfix/README_FILES/FILTER_README file? How are you calling SA - Procmail or other? --Larry > -Original Message- > From: Garth Serjeantson > > I seem to be at my wits end here. Do I actaully alter anything in > the SA files for it to work? I thought I had post

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie trying to set SA up with postfix

[posted and mailed] On Aug 1, 2003 at 09:42, Garth Serjeantson wrote: >I seem to be at my wits end here. Do I actaully alter anything in the >SA files for it to work? I thought I had postfix configured correctly, >but I probably don't. Any one willing to help me out here? Perhaps >some one wi

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

> -Original Message- > From: AltGrendel > On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:32, Bonny wrote: > > In data 29 Jul 2003 15:31:04 -0400 > > AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > > > > > Yes, but you will probably have to use the nodeps option. > > > > Why this? I mean, when UNinstalling, what

RE: [SAtalk] newbie: SA not catching contents in HTML

> -Original Message- > From: Gary Lopez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] newbie: SA not catching contents in HTML > > > Good afternoon, > I'm sure I'm not unique to this, but I have search the > archives an

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:32, Bonny wrote: > In data 29 Jul 2003 15:31:04 -0400 > AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > > > Yes, but you will probably have to use the nodeps option. > > Why this? I mean, when UNinstalling, what is nodeps good for? Ok, maybe I spoke out of turn here. But as I

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

In data 29 Jul 2003 15:31:04 -0400 AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > Yes, but you will probably have to use the nodeps option. Why this? I mean, when UNinstalling, what is nodeps good for? -- Bonny - Registered Linux User #251752 --- VB LUG Moderator --- All E-mail gladly receiv

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 13:45, Bonny wrote: > In data Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:01:53 -0700 > Jason Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > > > install Mail::SpamAssassin > > > > Spell it correctly, it is caps sensitive. > > OK, just wanting to know the last thing: > > can I remove all the RPMs relate

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

In data Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:01:53 -0700 Jason Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > install Mail::SpamAssassin > > Spell it correctly, it is caps sensitive. OK, just wanting to know the last thing: can I remove all the RPMs related to SA or not, when installing from CPAN? Thanks -- Bonny

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:14:36 -0400, you wrote: >Sorry if it sounded like I was replying just to you. I was following the >thread and suggesting a different route and supplying an answer rather than >just do something else. > >Great, but the advisement was to go the CPAN route. I would counter t

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:49:55 -0400, you wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Michael W. Cocke > >> There's also some kind of dependency error in the redhat RPM/ >> SpamAssassin chain. I never did get the most recent RPM to install, >> it keeps complaining about a dependency problem -

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

To install spamassassin via CPAN... perl -MCPAN -e shell (If you have not set it up before, It will have a configuration that you need to go through. Read through it and adjust it accordingly.) Once that is done and you are at the cpan prompt: install Mail::SpamAssassin Spell it correctly, it

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

In data Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:53:50 -0400 "Michael W. Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > There's also some kind of dependency error in the redhat RPM/ > SpamAssassin chain. I never did get the most recent RPM to install, > it keeps complaining about a dependency problem - and asking me to > ins

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

On 28 Jul 2003 09:05:58 -0400, you wrote: >On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 07:14, Bonny wrote: >> In data Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:27:44 -0400 >> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: >> >> >> > If you want to know in-depth, check out the changelog: >> > >> > http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/Changes >> >

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 07:14, Bonny wrote: > In data Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:27:44 -0400 > Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > > > > If you want to know in-depth, check out the changelog: > > > > http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/Changes > > > > 2.44 was released 2003-01-31 and 2.55 was rele

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

In data Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:27:44 -0400 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scriveva: > If you want to know in-depth, check out the changelog: > > http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/Changes > > 2.44 was released 2003-01-31 and 2.55 was released 2003-05-19. OK, I'll check it. Now, as I got SpamAssas

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie... some questions

At 01:43 AM 7/26/2003 +0200, Bonny wrote: Hello! I'm using spamassassin 2.44 and would like to know a) the difference with the latest release (2.55 afair)... There's a very significant difference. First, 2.44's spamd has a buffer overflow vulnerability. This wasn't completly fixed till 2.50 so

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie: Bayes filtering

Hi John, You can see conf option descriptions here: http://au.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html or by using: perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf --Larry > -Original Message- > From: John Birkhead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > I'm a newbie too (I've been using

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie: Bayes filtering

ion? Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:16 PM To: George Yobst; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: Bayes filtering At 04:31 PM 7/16/03 -0700, George Yobst wrote: >As I understand it, the sa-lear

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: Bayes filtering

At 04:31 PM 7/16/03 -0700, George Yobst wrote: As I understand it, the sa-learn starts the Bayes filtering process, but is per-user, so everybody would have to do their own? How do I get it to run on the server level (or would that be too CPU intensive)? Can I just copy the files to .? Did a G

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question

Hi > I'm using QMail and yesterday I compiled the latest version of > SpamAssassin ! How can I configure it to block spam ?? > I have no idea at all ! > > P.S: do you know a god virus scanner for qmail ?? I would recommend using qmail-scanner and the clam antivirus software, I've had no problem

Re: [SAtalk] newbie=me -> want to put SA results in body of email in RH/amavisd/SA system

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:20:02AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Got a slick amavisd/postfix/SA MTA going and amd VERY happy with it, but > because the SA settings are in the /etc/amavisd.conf file I am having some > problems with setting options beyond the standard ones. Hi, I'm using a

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie Question and a Stupid Question

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:44:06PM -0600, RTS wrote: > On a generic site wide configuration when SA identifies a piece of > mail based on required_hits as spam what does it do with it?? The same thing it does when not on a side-wide basis; it marks up the mail and passes it back. ie:

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie question...

Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We have a Red hat 7.3 mail server and I am looking for a way to filter > out SPAM email from our server. We have about 30 email accounts. Can > SpamAssassin do this? Yes. -- Daniel Quinlan Linux, open source, and http://www.pathname.com/~q

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie help (using SA with qmail)

Well, first get spamassassin installed.. untar it, install it per the INSTALL file. Note that SA doesn't "force" itself into your mail processing stream so doing this part in advance doesn't alter qmail. Then see if it works properly when invoked via the command line. spamassassin -tD Once th

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie problem: rewrite_subject not rewriting, spam_level_stars not included...

Leave it to the newbie. My problem is caused from qmail-scanner running "fast_spamassassin" instead of "verbose_spamassassin". I took the -c out of the options for spamc and it worked like a charm. Stupidly, Geoff Brisbine = Hello, all

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie alert. What is What is X-Spam-Prev-Content-Transfer-Encoding

On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:18:30PM -0500, Mike Schrauder wrote: > Where can I find docs on what this is, how it is generated, etc > X-Spam-Prev-Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 It's a defanged header. It used to be the same without the X-Spam-Prev bit on it. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: I kn

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie questions..perhaps?

Both of these questions pertains to amavisd-new. Ask on the amavis lists and I'm sure lots of people will be able to help you. I dont use amavis so, well, I cant help you. --- Lars Hansson --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie to Spamassassin Q

Michael Weber wrote: > I have just finished installing SA 2.4.2 and my users are pretty happy If you are using the automatic whitelist, you won't be happy very long with 2.42. This version had some strange notions about how to calculate thw AWL score. ciao Klaus --

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie to Spamassassin Q

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:01:32PM -0600, Michael Weber wrote: > Thanx for the info, but I still have the problem that the line in my > local.cf file > > report_header 1 > > is being ignored. I still get the SPAM: lines in the body. I've tried > using 0, I've tried putting it in the 10_

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie to Spamassassin Q

Thanx for the info, but I still have the problem that the line in my local.cf file report_header 1 is being ignored. I still get the SPAM: lines in the body. I've tried using 0, I've tried putting it in the 10_main.cf file. Nothing works. Any idea what the problem is? Thanx! Micha

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie to Spamassassin Q

PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Newbie to Spamassassin Q I have changed the report_header entry from 0 to 1 and back again. It doesn't seem to make a difference. (Yes, I restarted spamd when I made the change.) I have now added it to the local.cf file and will try it

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie to Spamassassin Q

Greetings Michael: Note the reply from Theo. If you put your customizations in local.cf they will survive the next upgrade... Quentin Krengel http://www.oilsoflife.com/netmarket -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael Weber Sent: Tu

  1   2   >