Is it possible to have the attachemt only, piped into sa-learn ?
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:31, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 10:45 AM 8/11/2003 -0400, Russell Premont wrote: > >setup an address that users could forward spam to, so I could then run > >sa-learn on the mail folder. My question is can I use sa-learn in this > >manner or will it also pick up the addresses that forwarded the mail to the > >spam account also? > > It won't pick up the addresses... bayes doesn't work that way... > > It will however pick up on the body and header modifications that result > from forwarding, so it will mis-learn as a result of that. > > Unfortunately a pure, completely unmodified message is pretty much the only > reasonable input to sa-learn. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
