Re: [SAtalk] Delete vs tagging spam

(from what I've read) delete email above a user-defined deletion threshold without a mysql preference from spamassassin. It seems that way anyway.. Cal Evans said: > To the moderator of the FAQ: > > Can we make this a FAQ? > > Not to be rude to you Andrew, I know you are just aski

[SAtalk] Delete vs tagging spam

Would it be possible for an additional mysql preferance for a threshold to be added to an upcoming spamassassin release for mail deletion? e.g. A user sets required_hits to 5, and sets deletion_hits to 10, any mail between 5 and 10 is tagged, anything above 10 is deleted.

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

ion to the standard requied_hits tagging threshold. Andrew Douglas Kirkland said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 11 January 2004 07:35, Geoffrey Lane wrote: >> I've setup my kmail to keep the mail on my isp's server, so that I can > d

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie: delete only spam from server

ion to the standard requied_hits tagging threshold. Andrew Douglas Kirkland said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sunday 11 January 2004 07:35, Geoffrey Lane wrote: >> I've setup my kmail to keep the mail on my isp's server, so that I can > d

Re: [SAtalk] SQL Integration

n, or should it be included by default? (SA 2.61) Thanks Carl R. Friend said: >On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Andrew Cranson wrote: > > >> Hi, strange, it's ignoring pretty much anything else I ask it to do via mysql. Is there anything would override mysql preferences? > &g

Re: [SAtalk] SQL Integration

Hi, strange, it's ignoring pretty much anything else I ask it to do via mysql. Is there anything would override mysql preferences? Carl R. Friend said: >On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Andrew Cranson wrote: > >> What per-user preferences are supported by the mysql integration? Just >

[SAtalk] SQL Integration

What per-user preferences are supported by the mysql integration? Just the basics like required_hits and white/blacklisting, or is it possible to support more? Thanks. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fas

[SAtalk] Delete SPAM

Hi, Is there a mySQL preference can be used to force spamassassin to drop/delete all emails above a certain score? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering

[SAtalk] SA for home use, with POP server at ISP?

OP, IMAP). Thanks! - Andy -- Andrew Lazarewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://alum.mit.edu/www/alaz --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Fre

[SAtalk] E-mail client set-up help request

to Earthlink over a cable connection. Thank you! - Andy -- Andrew Lazarewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://alum.mit.edu/www/alaz --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Si

[SAtalk] E-mail client set-up help request

to Earthlink over a cable connection. Thank you! - Andy -- Andrew Lazarewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://alum.mit.edu/www/alaz --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills

[SAtalk] newbie install help?

mail client at home? Thanks! - Andy -- Andrew Lazarewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://alum.mit.edu/www/alaz --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM&#

[SAtalk] Re: SA not adding any headers

Thanks for the response. I received a reply off list that told me basically the same thing. I rewrote my .qmail file so that spamc wouldn't run into a dead-end and everything is working now. In case anyone is interested, here is what it looks like now. |/usr/local/bin/ifspamh andrew a

[SAtalk] SA not adding any headers

is working but still no headers. Here is a sample. 2003-12-26 20:23:06.720264500 connection from localhost.arda.homeunix.net [127.0.0.1] at port 2960 2003-12-26 20:23:06.744287500 info: setuid to andrew succeeded 2003-12-26 20:23:06.756475500 processing message <20031227004445.CXRH23238> for

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and SendMail

solution). It would be interesting to compare notes once we have it up and running. SA is awesome and has been well received by our users. To those kind souls who create popcorn, bigevil, weeds, etc.: THANK YOU!!! :)) -- Andrew Chaplin, System Admin II Canisius College - Information Techno

[SAtalk] Memory leaks in Spam Assassin 2.5x and 2.6x on Solaris 9.

eople have on fixing this. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Whyte Corporate Systems Administrator Information Technology Division Central Queensland University Australia --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in L

[SAtalk] SA suddenly fails lint

at /usr/local/bin/spamassassin line 69. If anybody can help with the above error I would appreciate it. Thanks in advance. - Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you

[SAtalk] Rule Length

Hi Everyone, Does anybody know if there is any limit for the character length of a rule? (so - '/RULE/' < 254 characters)? I'm just setting up a database to hold my rules. So I am just deciding if I should use a Memo field or not for the rule? Thank

[SAtalk] Using SA to check a string

"; my $status = $spamtest->check_message_text($mail); -- end script -- Thanks! Regards Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it he

[SAtalk] URI Rule

Fellow Assassins, Here is an example of some of the URLs coming through in spam mail. http://www Would a rule like /w/ match this? Regards, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does

[SAtalk] Error in mail logs relating to SPAMD

tory even though i created user & is in user path of /home/user. What am i missing here Regards Andrew --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Commu

[SAtalk] AWL not being generated

All the documentation for version 2.60 says that autowhitelist is turned on by default and that by default the autowhitelist is stored in each users config directory (e.g. ~/.spamassassin/autowhitelist) When I installed spamassissin, it installed with no problem and is doing a great job of filt

[SAtalk] Errorcode 74 from spamassassin?

does anyone know where exit code 74 is generated in the code, so that I can add some sort of additional error message based on the reason for input/output error -- it is such a broad error message! Thanks to anyone who can help! Sincerely, Andrew __

[SAtalk] SA WISH LIST Country Identification 2 Digit Codes

Title: SA WISH LIST Country Identification 2 Digit Codes It would be great if SA created a Header entry called country of Origin and Identified this with a the 2 digit code… Examples CO:CA CO:US CO:AF Creating Continent code or the assigning IP org would be great to. So that each head

RE: [SAtalk] Clearing the database - messed up autolearn

Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:34:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > other than the expiration. Is "sa-learn --rebuild > --force-expire" the option > > I'm looking for to clean it entirely? > > Delete the db files. I installed amavisd-new an

[SAtalk] Clearing the database - messed up autolearn

force-expire" the option I'm looking for to clean it entirely? Pointers to the relevent documentation are also welcome. Thanks! -- Andrew Boring Miller Zell Desktop Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bleakness ... desolation ... plastic forks ... --

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes works for some users but not others

that range. Strange, as all the ones I got over the night were in the 80-90 range. Oh well, all's well that ends well, even if I don't understand why yet! - Andrew. On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 22:32, Andrew Clarke wrote: > I've been using Spamassassin for 1-2 months now. For a whi

[SAtalk] Bayes works for some users but not others

Are there any checks to see why this could be? Maybe my bayes data files are corrupt or something but I don't know how to check their validity. Each of my users has their own Bayes databases in ~/.spamassassin, and use_bayes = 1 both her user_prefs file and mine. Thanks for any ideas a

Re: [SAtalk] Running sa-learn on multiple mboxes

thing was being reminded about grep having not used it for the last 5 or so years in windows-land. In case anybody's wondering, I have procmail move suspected spam into spam/probably_spam and then the couple of us using this computer move our email into spam/definitely_spam when we clean out tha

Re: [SAtalk] _REPORT_ format

Let me revive an old theme: On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:03:31AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:29:46PM +0400, Andrew A. Vasilyev wrote: > > I get your point of view, but why didn't you put > > the rule name at the end of former line in pa

[SAtalk] Running sa-learn on multiple mboxes

ith a folder for spam but other than that they could have any number of mbox files with various names under their ~/mail directory. I only have 3 right now but I want to get a good system going and then deploy it more widely. Any suggestions on the best way to do this? Thanks! - Andrew Cla

RE: [SAtalk] Bayesian learning and mbox mailbox type

I'm still very new to this so excuse me if I'm speaking below your intellect, but I had a similar problem when I first tried sa-learn. I was using --file instead of --mbox. I tried: sa-learn --spam --mbox definitely_spam and it worked fine. - Andrew. -Original Message- Fr

RE: *****THIS MESSAGE IS SPAM***** [SAtalk] Problem with "penis e nlargement" :)

Thanks for the tip. I'm new to SpamAssassin and this list. So if I just move my procmail rule for this list above my call to spamc, that will work, right? Then email from this list will be moved out of my mailbox and into another one before spamassassin is run on my inbox. Thanks, - A

[SAtalk] bayes autolearning doesn't seem to be on

so in my setup at least I don't think I'd care if bayes learned some emails incorrectly as I'd correct it manually later. If anybody can tell me what's going on and what I'm missing, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, - Andrew. ---

[SAtalk] Strange behavior with a message

ve added a single character. The first scores 3.8, the second scores 15.8 (9.8 if no local rules). Thanks, -- Andrew L. Bereson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (800)307-5754 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 3 01:53:13 2003 Received: from www.sea-ware.com ([192.168.10.1]) by localhost.locald

Re: [SAtalk] trouble with RCVD_IN_ORBS

It's not a SpamAssassin problem (although SA could work around it by checking for specific results for all DNSBL's). I think Verisign is doing something screwy... # while true; do name=dwqkljdlkqjwdlij`perl -e 'print int(rand(1))'`a.com; echo $name; host $name; done dwqkljdlkqjwdlij72

Re: [SAtalk] trouble with RCVD_IN_ORBS

//www.goldinc.com/dodfa11/ http://www.dorkslayers.org/ # host -t ns dorkslayers.com Host not found. I'm not sure why Net::DNS would be returning A records for these queries, although I did run into the same problem with Python's ADNS resolver. It was intermittently returning 65.24

Re: [SAtalk] _REPORT_ format

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:55:48PM +0100, Sean Cardus wrote: > I've done just that... In PerMsgStatus.pm I've changed lines 2214-2216 > to: > $self->{test_logs} .= sprintf ("* % 2.1f -- %s%s [%s]\n%s", > $score, $area, $desc, > $r

Re: [SAtalk] _REPORT_ format

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > I've always considered the "no rule names report format" a "duh" feature of > SA, so I for one am glad for the change. I get your point of view, but why didn't you put the rule name at the end of former line in parenthesis. An

[SAtalk] _REPORT_ format

Hi! Could the developers be so kind to explain the reason for changing the _REPORT_ template output format? Old: X-Spam-Report: -17.3 points, 5.0 required; * 1.0 -- From: does not include a real name * 0.4 -- BODY: HTML is missing "table" close tags * 0.3 -- BO

[SAtalk] SA Marks AOL Bounce messages as spam

Has anyone else noticed that SA tags AOL bounce messages as spam? Which I also find to be incorrect because messages should be rejected when the MTA attempts to establish a connection, not after the message is delivered. Content analysis details: (5.10 points, 5 required) FAILURE_NOTICE_1 (-0.

[SAtalk] sa-learn, Spamassassin::CmdLearn

g spam assassin, no users have system accounts on the server I am configuring. More to the point, has anybody made this work already? Andrew --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU

[SAtalk] Syntax question

' } I'm hopeful a more experienced eye can spot the syntax error causing this. - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 10:34am up 69 days, 19:07, 10 users, load average: 2.66, 1.60, 1.40 -

[SAtalk] SA CVS mirror

Hi! Is there any CVS mirror for SA project? Probably the cvs.sourceforge.net is overloaded, too often aborting the connections. ANDY --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Bec

[SAtalk] Installation Help Needed (INC and default configuration)

55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Question 2) Why is it trying to look in /usr/share when I am installing a local copy of spamassassin. Is there a different variable that I need to set at well so that it defaults to ~/src/spamgone/share/spamass

RE: [SAtalk] Ham/spam aliases

Thanks for that link. I had posted a while back to the list and never recieved any worthwhile information. Bellsouth AFAIK uses the brightmail spam system which does a similar thing for reporting spam messages. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de W

RE: [SAtalk] Upgrading via CPAN

es_policy ask > > install Mail::SpamAssassin > > > > or is there a specific CPAN upgrade command/syntax? > > That CPAN command sequence should be fine. I have no idea if you need to stop postfix before running it or not, I don't use postfix. -- Andrew <[EMAIL PR

RE: [SAtalk] Question: Bandwidth usage by spamd

ourse. And no offence to the original poster, but that question is actually just a "Your Mileage May Vary" question. That's how Tony figured you weren't an admin, or at least a newbie admin. -- Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Re: [SAtalk] Comments on 2.50

> HS> are way too high - a lot of legitimate email gets flagged. I have > HS> adjusted them for my system, but it might be nice to make spamassassin > HS> less English centric out of the box. > > It is not English-centric. It is an RFC violation to have 8-bit > characters there. Flagging RFC vio

[SAtalk] Spamassassin 2.50 beta on Freshmeat.net

Has anyone told fresmeat.net about the release? -- Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#

RE: [SAtalk] HTML only messages

Isnt it already in place to lower outlook scores? Why not just increase the score for HTML mails and increase the amount deducted for outlook? -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Bob Proulx Enviado el: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:12 PM Para: [EMAI

RE: [SAtalk] success stories with SA ?

We do internet <-> [SA/virus scanner gateway] <-> [sendmail server] <-> [exchange server] Some clients on the sendmail server, some on the exchange server. SA works great for us, 300 employees, 5000 messages a day to/from the internet (33-45% spam) Andrew > -Origina

RE: [SAtalk] hit-frequencies output question

Where are the logs? It tells me it cannot find spam.log. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Yevgeniy Miretskiy Enviado el: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:46 PM Para: Spam Assassin Asunto: [SAtalk] hit-frequencies output question This is a header

RE: [SAtalk] UebiMiau Spam

Also I just had a thought, does SA add any (alot) of points if it detects it as two mailers (say a spammer trying to get his message past SA)? -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder Enviado el: Tuesday, January 1

[SAtalk] UebiMiau Spam

When forwarding a non-spam message with UebiMiau webmail, Spam Assasin thinks it's spam! Anyone have any similar issues or know what I could do to fix this? Also it seems that SA breaks HTML in email when the message is Spam, is that how it should be or just a slight bug or the result of editing

[SAtalk] Submitting SPAM that doesn't get SpamAssassinated

My Web host uses SpamAssassin to filter e-mail, but quite a bit gets through. I've looked at the FAQs and don't find a mechanism for a Windows (2000) user to submit the offending e-mails for inclusion in the filtering. Is there one? --- This

RE: [SAtalk] Running Spam Assassin

, 2003 9:50 PM Para: Andrew Joakimsen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: [SAtalk] Running Spam Assassin I am using the same thing here works fine did you use the included perl script that came in the archice to proccess the incoming mail? > I am using XMail server (www.xmailserver.com) but cant seem

[SAtalk] Running Spam Assassin

I am using XMail server (www.xmailserver.com) but cant seem to get this working. I am using the Spam Assassin script on that same page, it seems to be doing something like spamc < mailfile by a PERL script which does not in any way alter the email. If I SSH in and tell it spamc -c < file it will g

RE: [SAtalk] RE: OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access

They don't get individual email addresses like this list does. And you can't tailor them for your environment. They are too bold, often, or not bold enough, in their blocking. Andrew > -Original Message- > From: Steve Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursda

[SAtalk] RE: OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access

I'm including the spamassassin list in this because I think it is relevant there as well. Has anyone thought about starting some kind of distributed (like razor and dcc) or community (like spamassassin) based effort to build a near real time access list like this? Obviously this list doesn't catch

RE: [SAtalk] re: Hispeedmedia: spam with images as content

On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 03:17, Michael Moncur wrote: > > If you think that's an easy solution, you're not getting as much HSM spam as > I am. That rule only matched 23 HSM spam out of over 300 from the last 30 > days in my corpus. > > OVERALL% SPAM% NONSPAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME >834

[SAtalk] Spam Conference.

This may be a duplicate, but I saw it on Slashdot. MIT is holding a spam conference on Jan 17th,2003. Details are at http://www.spamconference.org. Thanks. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkg

[SAtalk] Blacklist_to and Whitelist_to

Hiya All, My Sendmail/Mimedefang/Spamassassin installation does not seem to be recognising the blacklist_to and whitelist_to lists. The filter picks up the blacklist_from and whitelist_from perfectly. Anybody know what might cause this? Regards, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail

dmail does not run procmail? Is this behaviour by design? -- Andrew - Original Message - From: "Rich Duzenbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail > At 07:54 PM 11/29/0

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail

endmail /var/log/maillog ; 'Suspicious rcfile "/etc/procmailrc" .. Though when I run the command without /etc/procmail nothing is logged? Do I also need to add a path (eg, /tmp/procmailrc) with the -m option in my sendmail.cf file? -- Andrew - Original Message - From: "Ric

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail

procmail isn't reading /etc/procmailrc .. I tried adding /tmp/procmailrc to the flags in sendmail for procmail, though it didn't help. I think I might also try and compile it on another machine to see if I get the same results. Regards, Andrew > > > > >Yep, the message is

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail

ceived the message, but it wasn't passed to the spamd and no logfile or logs were recorded. Same thing again, maybe not reading /etc/procmailrc? -- Andrew > First things first -- Is procmail working? > > /etc/procmailrc world readable? > > cat sample-spam.txt | procmail > > che

Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail

ail -Y -a $h -d $u -- Andrew - Original Message - From: "Ed Kasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail > At 09:04 AM Friday, 11/29/2002, And

[SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail

ndmail does not pass the message to procmail. Sendmail will receive the message and skip the filter. Is there something I am missing? Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Pow

[SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail

sendmail receives the e-mail it is not passed to procmail. Instead it just gets sent before filtering. Thanks All! Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a com

RE: [SAtalk] installing DCC and pyzor breaks spamc but not spamassassin

I had this happen on one of my systems as well, I never figured out the cause. It was after I installed dcc, I didn't install pyzor. I ended up just setting it to run spamassassin as it is a low volume mail server. Andrew > -Original Message- > From: Jon Gabrielson [ma

Re: [SAtalk] SQL Database of Scores

do > you decide? > > You could take the first users listed, but what if user1 whitelists > *@ebay.com and user2 blacklists *@ebay.com? > Yeah good point, and most spam is going to be address to multiple recipients... So maybe what i'm looking

[SAtalk] SQL Database of Scores

ase then a global config would be used. Thanks! -- Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect

Re: [SAtalk] How do I change the link in the body of the SPAM text

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 03:14, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Just grep for "http://spamassassin.org/tag"; in the installed .cf > (configuration) files. Specifically, "10_misc.cf". > Won't this get overwritten with the next upgrade they install? Is there a more elegant solution (local.cf or some such t

Re: [SAtalk] Building A SpamAssassin Box, how much horsepower?

> > I have a similar number of accounts on my mail server. I have a P4 1.5GHz > 1G RAM Dell workstation running spamd. The box coasts most of the day and > works hard during a spam storm. > > We process an average of just over 50,000 messages per day. We call > spamc from the global procmailr

Re: [SAtalk] 2.43 requirements

On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 15:23, Ryan wrote: > I am reading through the requirements, and see the need to > install HTML::Parser. Does anyone have a guide on installing > this? I tried to pull the individual modules down, but the > in turn have requirements. I am strapped for time, and can't > wander

Re: *****SPAM***** [SAtalk] Mutual project

On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 18:38, useni teejee wrote: > DEAR FRIEND, > > I AM A DIRECTOR OF THE CONTRACT SECTION OF THE > NIGERIAN TRANSPORT AND AVIATION HEADQUARTERS IN LAGOS, Spaming the Spamassassin list. This is a joke, right? I love it. --

Re: [SAtalk] SA feature/idea?

On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 01:28, Carl E. Mankinen wrote: > With all this talk of SA stalling, I decided to go ahead and post an idea > that a friend of mine posed to me a couple days ago. I don't think he is > interested in posting to the list, but he hates spam as much as I do. > > The idea is to do

Re: [SAtalk] spamd log to mrtg

On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 20:52, Kelsey Cummings wrote: > Yet another method, using cricket which IMHO is far better than MRTG. > > http://www.sonic.net/~kgc/cricket/ > Cricket can be tough to setup though. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by

Re: [SAtalk] ok_locales question

Michael Moncur wrote: > > Possibly stupid question: The ok_locales setting is "all" by default. Does > this mean that *nothing* will be marked as spam in a foreign language? Yes > If so, how do I tell it that everything in non-English locales can be marked > as spam? "en" isn't listed as one of

Re: *****SPAM***** [SAtalk] Eval Rule for Bad Encoding

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 16:11, Erik Berry wrote: > Does anyone have an eval rule for an invalid encoding header? I often see > spam with this pattern: Well, my setup: SA 2.41, Qmail,qmail-scanner, etc.. found this just from your mail: X-Spam-Report: Detailed Report SPAM: St

Re: [SAtalk] URL blacklist

Daniel Rogers wrote: > Personally, I just have some (rather large) body tests in my local.cf with > bad domains in 'em. Please post these to the list if they're not already available somewhere. Thanks very much Andy --- This sf.net email is s

Re: [SAtalk] SA performance info

Kevin Gagel wrote: > > Here is a random sampling from my server. One of the highest ones I saw in > skimming over two days worth was 47 seconds and one of the lowest I saw was 12 > seconds. > > > What I want to be able to say is something like "a Pentium IV with 512Mb of RAM >and > > > a SCSI d

Re: [SAtalk] SA-2.41 installation problems

Brad Koehn wrote: > > While trying to upgrade to SA-2.41 via CPAN, I get the following error: > > t/spamd_maxchildren.ok 27/33# Failed test 28 in > t/spamd_maxchildren.t at line 44 > # t/spamd_maxchildren.t line 44 is: ok (spamcrun ("< data/spam/001", > \&patterns_run_cb)); I tried the

Re: [SAtalk] Gotcha! IP, date and time - you gave me all I need :o)

port an abuse. Anything I > should keep in mind when doing so (some tipps from the experienced)? Just don't go insane and add entire Cs to your blacklists. There are at least a dozen mail servers in my C. :-) Regards, Andrew --- This sf.ne

Re: [SAtalk] Enlarge Your Boss ...

[please > click, refinance your, the internet, what] SPAM:[you, > wish receive, you not] > SPAM: SPAM_PHRASES_020 (2.1 points) spam-phrase score is over 20 Interesting that it didn't trip any porn scores. I suppose that "your pe

Re: [SAtalk] Disable Porn Filtering

handle the cases you've > mentioned - both on your own private installation. I disagree. Why on earth are kernel config options tripping porn tests? an ALL_CAPS test sure, but porn tests?! Regards, Andrew --- This sf.net email is sponso

Re: [SAtalk] spam high scores

_SPAM_SRC What are you using to record this? I was going to do something very similar but if you've already got public code I'd like to use it. Regards, Andrew --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it&#

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spam Genetics?

gt; Not to mention one of your users could have his mail forwarded > off-site, and then forwarded back in. The From: in that case should not be the original address. Forwards should alter the From, redirects should not. > That's the problem with whitelists. It is easy enough to forge

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Genetics?

list because it's from a whitelisted domain (the domain I run SA on). Regards, Andrew --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek We have stuff for geeks like you. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Genetics?

nguage tool something like that would be awesome, though. Regards, Andrew --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek We have stuff for geeks like you. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-tal

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Genetics?

> Has anyone taken a huge spam database and sent it through some sort of > genetic learning program to see if spam can be identified that way? Um.. yeah. http://www.spamassassin.org. You might be familliar with them. Regards,

[SAtalk] DB-based user pref search order

refs. That way any user prefs also defined in GLOBAL would override the global prefs, while still keeping all the fun whitelist entries and so on. Justin? Anyone? Thoughts? If there are no objections, could this order be put in to the next release? Or at least documente

Re: [SAtalk] Brian Platt/Hgsi is out of the office.

I call her and ask her to turn off his retarded auto-away message? :-) Here's to hoping it's "smart" and only does this once for each recipient. Regards, Andrew --- Sponsored by:

Re: [SAtalk] db working but not?

* * ? (( ${MATCH} > 12 )) /opt/vchkpw/domains/gate-way.net/0/spamfile/Maildir/.highspam/ :0 /opt/vchkpw/domains/gate-way.net/0/spamfile/Maildir/ } # everything else to stdout :0w | ---

Re: [SAtalk] db working but not?

il is for steve (I see this in the logs) but it seems that the GLOBAL user has higher priority. Regards, Andrew --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkge

Re: [SAtalk] db working but not?

tries, where required_hits is 8.0. required_hits for this message is 8.0. Does this sound about right? Is there an easy way to reverse this if that is what's happenning? Regards, Andrew --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:

[SAtalk] db working but not?

lse. Can anyone explain why? I know that SA is picking up other scores for user "GLOBAL" just fine (individual score tests and the required_hits of 8.0) so I'm pretty sure it's not a database or db communication issue. This is SA 2.20. Regards, Andrew ---

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Re: How to? One copy of SA for all virtual domains on server (Redhat)

the -u $EXT part in spamc just tells SA which user the message is for so it can grab any user-specific preferences. You don't need that to start out with SA. :-) Regards, Andrew --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welc

[SAtalk] Fwd: Re: SPEWS? (SA trusts them)

My brother sent this to me and I thought I'd pass it on here since it seems relevant. Personally I don't use the blacklists because I don't want the extra network overhead/slowdowns but some of you may. Regards, Andrew -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Fwd:

  1   2   >