> This is such a special case that it would probably be the wrong thing to > do to insert additional rules into the public distribution of SA just to > take account of this. Easiest solution is just to zero the rules or, if > this isn't acceptable, write your own regexps to handle the cases you've > mentioned - both on your own private installation.
I disagree. Why on earth are kernel config options tripping porn tests? an ALL_CAPS test sure, but porn tests?! Regards, Andrew ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
