On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 16:11, Erik Berry wrote: > Does anyone have an eval rule for an invalid encoding header? I often see > spam with this pattern:
Well, my setup: SA 2.41, Qmail,qmail-scanner, etc.. found this just from your mail: X-Spam-Report: Detailed Report SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.90 hits, 5 required) SPAM: USER_AGENT (-1.1 points) Found a User-Agent header SPAM: X_ACCEPT_LANG (-0.4 points) Found a X-Accept-Language header SPAM: USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA (1.2 points) User-Agent header indicates a non-spam MUA (Mozilla) SPAM: HGH (4.0 points) BODY: Human Growth Hormone SPAM: DIET (2.3 points) BODY: Lose Weight Spam SPAM: HOT_NASTY (1.9 points) BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young SPAM: WHILE_YOU_SLEEP (0.2 points) BODY: While you Sleep SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 (-0.1 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 01 to 02 (low) SPAM: [score: 1] SPAM: KNOWN_MAILING_LIST (-2.1 points) Email came from some known mailing list software SPAM: SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results --------------------- I'm presuming that the BODY section(s) were reporting on the encoded header that you forwarded. I may be wrong, I'm still learning about this stuff. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
