> Just for kicks, perhaps you can force /etc/procmailrc for a test:
> cat sample-spam.txt | procmail /etc/procmailrc

That's it.. Procmail can't read /etc/procmailrc,
or at least /etc is not readable by the user.
I got the following error with 'cat sample-spam.txt | procmail
/etc/procmailrc'
--
procmail: Suspicious rcfile "/etc/procmailrc"
procmail: Couldn't read "/etc/procmailrc"
--
I moved the procmailrc file to the /tmp directory and it worked perfectly.

So the story so far is that Sendmail is not passing the message to procmail
and procmail isn't reading /etc/procmailrc ..

I tried adding /tmp/procmailrc to the flags in sendmail for procmail,
though it didn't help. I think I might also try and compile it on another
machine to see if I get the same results.

Regards,
Andrew


>
> >
> >Yep, the message is there. Though it wasn't passed through to the spamd,
> >which suggests to me that procmail is working but not reading
> >/etc/procmailrc ?..
>
> /etc readable by the user?
>
>
> > > Try setting LOGFILE=/tmp/testing and VERBOSE=YES in
> > > /etc/procmailrc.  (Remove after you are done)
> >
> >I set these options (thanx for them) and run a test.
> >I received the message, but it wasn't passed to the spamd and no logfile
> >or logs were recorded. Same thing again, maybe not reading
/etc/procmailrc?
>
> Hmm.  My /etc/procmailrc works just great.  man procmail says in the third
> para that /etc/procmailrc will [generall] be called.
>
> Just for kicks, perhaps you can force /etc/procmailrc for a test:
> cat sample-spam.txt | procmail /etc/procmailrc
>
> And see if the log gets created.  Oh, and anything logged into
> /var/log/messages?
>
> Other than that, I'm about out of ideas.
>
>
> >-- Andrew
> >
> > > First things first -- Is procmail working?
> > >
> > > /etc/procmailrc world readable?
> > >
> > > cat sample-spam.txt | procmail
> > >
> > > check the mbox file for the spam.  e.g. user foo (on my system) would
be
> >in
> > > /var/spool/mail/foo.
> > >
> > > Try setting LOGFILE=/tmp/testing and VERBOSE=YES in
> > > /etc/procmailrc.  (Remove after you are done)
> > >
> > > Try to run the sample-spam.txt through again.  Check the logfile.
Mine
> > > adds a couple of lines each time indicating the subject of the message
and
> > > which folder it was delivered to.
> > >
> > > At 09:57 PM 11/28/02, you wrote:
> > > > > Just a shot in the dark, but, did you create any recipes in
> >.procmailrc?
> > > >
> > > >Actually I have created a recipe in the /etc/procmailrc as follows;
> > > >
> > > >DROPPRIVS=yes
> > > >
> > > >:0fw
> > > >* < 256000
> > > >| /usr/local/bin/spamc -f
> > > >
> > > >I have not made any individual .procmailrc files yet, but that maybe
the
> > > >key.
> > > >It might be that the /etc/procmailrc file is not recognised/used?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >When I build the sendmail.mc file I receive no errors and the end
result
> >is;
> > > >
> > > >Mlocal,         P=/usr/local/bin/procmail, F=lsDFMAw5:/|@qSPfhn9,
> > > >S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromL, R=EnvToL/HdrToL,
> > > >                 T=DNS/RFC822/SMTP,
> > > >                 A=procmail -Y -a $h -d $u
> > > >
> > > >-- Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Ed Kasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:38 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sendmail and Procmail
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > At 09:04 AM Friday, 11/29/2002, Andrew wrote -=>
> > > > > >I have the following lines in my sendmail.mc file;
> > > > > >
> > > > > >FEATURE(local_procmail,`/usr/local/bin/procmail')
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the only line you really need.
> > > > >
> > > > > >But Sendmail does not pass the message to procmail.
> > > > > >Sendmail will receive the message and skip the filter.
> > > > > >Is there something I am missing?
> > > > >
> > > > > Just a shot in the dark, but, did you create any recipes in
> >.procmailrc?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ed Kasky
> > > > > Los Angeles, CA
> > > > > . . . . . . . .
> > > > > There are 3 kinds of people, those who can count & those who
can't.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-------------------------------------------------------
> > > >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
> > > >handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> > > >http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rich
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
> >handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> >http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
> >_______________________________________________
> >Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
> Regards,
> Rich
>
>




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T 
handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to