Kevin Gagel wrote: > > Here is a random sampling from my server. One of the highest ones I saw in > skimming over two days worth was 47 seconds and one of the lowest I saw was 12 > seconds.
> > > What I want to be able to say is something like "a Pentium IV with 512Mb of RAM >and > > > a SCSI drive will be able to deliver 2 or 3 messages per second on average" and >then > > > decide if I need 2, 3 or 10 of this machines for the job... What you want is cpu time not wall clock time. If you allow a few dozen simultaneous spamc connections to spamd then razor2's latency goes away. Or am I missing something? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
