How exactly did you determine what your hit percentage was for DCC,Razor
and your RBL's?
Could you send me more information on how you accomplished this, as I
would like to analyze the results on my mail server.
>>
>> I've got a similar impression with my corpuses here, the DCC hit
>> rate appears
> Joe -
>
> I've been running it on RH 9 since 2.53, and it has been rock solid. I
> just
> made sure I unset the LANG environment variable before running the
> installation.
> --
Is it worthwhile to have SA complain loudly if the defined langage is utf?
Should it refuse to run?
Complain on the c
> What's new about it, is that Postfix/amavisd-new - with this snapshot -
> can now do realtime smtp 5xx rejection of spam/virus (or save them to a
> quarantine directory, as before.) That lifts Postfix into SA-Exim 4's
> class as far as I'm concerned and I'm happy to be able to support it :-)
>
>
I used this method.
I recently upgraded to File::Scan+ Mcafee Uvscan on mimedefang to detect
zipped copies of the sobig virus.
File::Scan will not detect virus's that are zipped.
--luke
>
> Get the PERL module File::Scan and load it. Then get the MimeDefang
> package
> and install it. Mimedefang is
At 23:45 10/07/03 -0400, Barry McLarnon wrote:
On Jul 10, 2003 05:40 pm, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> However, are you able to generate any stats for the above tests
> (from the same period of time) for how often they triggered in
> *ham* ? EG so we can get an idea of the false positive rates of
> DCC, r
Came across these guys being advertised in a spam :)
http://www.hosting.bag.gs/
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasof
Joe -
I've been running it on RH 9 since 2.53, and it has been rock solid. I just
made sure I unset the LANG environment variable before running the
installation.
--
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
Cameron Technical Services, Inc.
(512) 454-3200 Main
http://www.camerontech.com
- Origina
On Jul 10, 2003 05:40 pm, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> However, are you able to generate any stats for the above tests
> (from the same period of time) for how often they triggered in
> *ham* ? EG so we can get an idea of the false positive rates of
> DCC, razor, and the various RBL'ssometimes the fa
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Joe Flowers wrote:
> I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and Perl
> 5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
> the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run SpamAssassin
> on this machine, but th
Chris Ochap wrote:
Click your heels together three times.
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] How to uninstall?
I totally can't get spamassassin working--how do you
Not very nice...
Roberta, if one of your clients said "I can't get this Server working,
how do I unplug it?", wouldn't you advise them to seek help form someone
knowledgeable rather than throwing it away?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm using the following method / setup:
For a group of users, I have a Courier IMAP folder with several
subfolders, as well as ham & spam subfolders. If a user detects a false
negative, he can simply drop it into the spam / ham folder and a cronjob
will exec
"sa-learn --dir --spam /home/user/M
Click your heels together three times.
-Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] How to uninstall?
>
> I totally can't get spamassassin working--ho
Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I did try adding those headers on a test server to
> see if it does work, and it does, $u actually puts <> around the email
> address by itself and $g doesnt, so for them to look consistent, you
want
>
> HX-Envelope-From: <$g>
> HX-Envelope-To: $u
At 21:19 10/07/03 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
Em Qui, 2003-07-10 às 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> >sendmail.cf
> >
> >#
> ># Format of headers #
> >#
> >
> >blah
> >blah
> >
> >HX-Envelope-From: $g
> >HX-Envelope-To: $u
> >
> >if i recall correctl
> I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and
Perl
> 5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
> the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run
SpamAssassin
> on this machine, but the SpamAssassin docs highly recommends
At 19:13 10/07/03 -0400, Scott Johnson wrote:
Apologies.
Redhat 6.2
Perl 5.6.1 installed by CPAN about two years ago
Make sure you don't have *two* different versions of perl on your system. Do a
whereis perl
And see if you have both /usr/bin/perl and /usr/local/bin/perl.
If you do, its possibl
At 19:38 10/07/03 -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and Perl
5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run SpamAssassin
on this machine, but the Spa
Em Qui, 2003-07-10 às 20:03, Simon Byrnand escreveu:
> >sendmail.cf
> >
> >#
> ># Format of headers #
> >#
> >
> >blah
> >blah
> >
> >HX-Envelope-From: $g
> >HX-Envelope-To: $u
> >
> >if i recall correctly :)
>
> Looks plausable, as $g is in Ret
Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any special reason you need the Envelope-Recipient ? If you run
SA
> from the local delivery agent you already know who the recipient is when
> procmail is called, if you run SA from a filter like Mimedefang then
there
> are potentially *mul
Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> sendmail.cf
>
> #
> # Format of headers #
> #
>
> blah
> blah
>
> HX-Envelope-From: $g
> HX-Envelope-To: $u
Most Excellent!!! Works like a champ! Anybody have the sendmail.mc
format? I've got my mi
I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and Perl
5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run SpamAssassin
on this machine, but the SpamAssassin docs highly recommends using Perl
Apologies.
Redhat 6.2
Perl 5.6.1 installed by CPAN about two years ago
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Scott Johnson wrote:
Which I think means there's something wrong with my perl install
(5.6.1, as noted in the path above), but I'm not sure what.
Might ring a bell with someone if you detailed your OS
At 23:03 10/07/03 +0100, Yorkshire Dave wrote:
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 22:08, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default
> configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To
> headers?
>
> If so, how does one get SendMail to create them?
>
se
Scott Johnson wrote:
Which I think means there's something wrong with my perl install (5.6.1,
as noted in the path above), but I'm not sure what.
Might ring a bell with someone if you detailed your OS and version. And
how you came by Perl 5.6.1.
I have RH 7.2. It had 5.6.0. The first time I thr
Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
Or is there something causing me to only use 'ored' strings?
Yours is Posix, Matt's is Perl/PCRE.
Best,
Tony
--
Tony Earnshaw
I love the music of Wagner. The only sound that
pleases me more is that of a cat outside my 9th
floor window, trying to cling to the glass with
Raul Dias wrote:
So, how do you balance this kind of situation?
Is whitelisting the only way to go?
I reckon that whitelisting's the only way, in this case. Even SA has a
list of bona fide e-mail firms/orgs like Amazon in itself, so that your
kind of example is exempted. To my mind, SA is a bit
Matt Kettler wrote:
I've seen a lot of "empty body" spam myself lately. Personally I
attribute this to broken spam generation tools that somehow fail to
properly send the body of the message. There's lots broken mass-mail
software out there, as is evidenced by the "RANDOM_WORD" markup seen in
| I've been seeing this too, so I added the following rule to my local.cf:
|
| header __TEXT_HTML_BA Content-Type =~ /text\/html/i
| meta NO_BODY_BA __TEXT_HTML_BA && !HTML_MESSAGE
| describe NO_BODY_BA Message with no body
| score NO_BODY_BA 4
|
| It's been working great for me.
we strip text/
At 17:08 10/07/03 -0400, Dan O'Brien wrote:
Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default
configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To
headers?
No it doesn't.
However it does create a "Return-Path" header that is the same as what
would be in X-Envelope-Fro
I totally can't get spamassassin working--how do you uninstall it?
Thanks
<>
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>
> I had a rule note on this from before. Haven't got to it yet. Basicaly
> because of the FP rate. I'm going to write a few quick rules that look for
> letterzeroletter and letter1letter. You can see why the FP rate would be
> high. But I would score
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 22:08, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default
> configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To
> headers?
>
> If so, how does one get SendMail to create them?
>
sendmail.cf
#
# Fo
Hallo,
> > Hi, i've attahced a very tricky SPAM mail that has been
> > scored with 0.8
> > points, what can be done with this kind of SPAM?.
> > Thanks
> > German
> >
> It is easy to write a rule for some of the better knowns ones like
> /(f|ph)(o|0)t(o|0)/i
> but with all the ways of doing OBFU i
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 02:10:46PM -0700, Richard Stockton wrote:
> No explanation of how this will be handled in 2.60, but perhaps
> that is hidden in the new docs somewhere.
It's all in the new sa-learn docs. In short, you can disable
auto-expiry/auto-sync if you want to. For expiry, you set t
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:07:17PM -0400, John P Verel wrote:
> In Mail::SpamSssassin::Conf, there's the option called dns_available. I
> want to point this to my ISP's DNS server to speed up the RBL checks.
>
> dns_available test: server1.ltd, etc.
>
> Can someone clarify how to set this up?
dn
Can anyone make a recommendation as to an AV package, preferably one which
can be built into an (S)RPM without too terribly much work and which will
play nice with Sendmail?
Well, not an RPM, but HBEDV AntiVir Milter works wonderfully overhere, has
daily updates, and installs in a breeze! Plus, it
At 12:07 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, John P Verel wrote:
dns_available test: server1.ltd, etc.
Can someone clarify how to set this up?
It's actualy .tld, not ltd..
In general what you do is instead of "server1.tld" specify some domain that
you want SA to perform a MX record lookup for via dns.
So in y
I filed bug report #2208 and received this "resolution".
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2208
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
At 11:31 10/07/03 -0400, Barry McLarnon wrote:
On Jul 9, 2003 01:47 am, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:24:55AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> ...
>
> > Certainly my initial impression after 24 hours is that DCC is the
> > most effective, followed by RAZOR2, followed by PYZOR. Al
I've been seeing this too, so I added the following rule to my local.cf:
header __TEXT_HTML_BA Content-Type =~ /text\/html/i
meta NO_BODY_BA __TEXT_HTML_BA && !HTML_MESSAGE
describe NO_BODY_BA Message with no body
score NO_BODY_BA 4
It's been working great for me.
Sandy S.
- Original Message
> I have the same problem trying to install on a RH 8.0 box. Havent found
> a solution yet though.
>
> Richard Humphrey
Just hit this one, myself.
I worked around it by installing the perl-Digest-SHA1-2.01-10.i386.rpm from the Red
Hat 9 disc 2. I suspect it's included with Red Hat 8.0
also.
R
Actually...I think spamd may be running and
listening on the correct port. I did more digging and found:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-smtpd]# lsof
-PniCOMMAND PID USER
FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE
NAMEspamd 727
spamd 5u IPv4
1295 TCP
127.0.0.1:783 (LISTEN)
I've read through the posts regarding the integration of SunONE with
Spamassassin, but have a pertinent question. When following Sun's
brightmail configuration options, the iMS server must be running in direct
LDAP mode. From the posts and configuration files I've seen, if I follow
their similar in
VonEssen, John wrote:
I have been seeing this sort of spam come up on several different mail
servers I work on.
The email is definitely spam and it tests positive for a few RBL, but
not enough to raise its score significantly. The one I got the other day
only scored 2.9.
I know that on my system
Am I correct in my observation that SendMail, in its default
configuration, does *NOT* create the X-Envelope-From and X-Envelope-To
headers?
If so, how does one get SendMail to create them?
Thanks,
Dan O'Brien
__
Axon Solutions, Inc.
At 12:57 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, VonEssen, John wrote:
I have been seeing this sort of spam come up on several different mail
servers I work on.
The email is definitely spam and it tests positive for a few RBL, but
not enough to raise its score significantly. The one I got the other day
only scored 2.9
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 02:47:50PM -0400, Wendell Smith wrote:
> I am trying to feed sa-learn some spam/ham and I was wondering
> something...
>
> Can I feed sa-learn ONE file that contains a large number of emails? I
> ask this because I use Evolution and sort my mail into folders. Now
> instead
At 02:47 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, Wendell Smith wrote:
Can I feed sa-learn ONE file that contains a large number of emails?
It should work if it's in mbox format and you tell sa-learn to use that
format. The alternative is to use a tool to split it out into many files in
a single directory and use the
I second the recommendation for MailScanner. We use it
in conjunction with Sophos here (with great results), and MailScanner
can use any number of anti-virus engines -- including clamAV -- and can
use multiple scan engines at the same time. It also integrates with
SpamAssassin and has a host of
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 01:54:07PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> body LOCAL_SHOCKING_PHOTOS /\bsh(?:0|o)c(?:1|i)ng ph(?:0|o)t(?:0|o)(?:s|z)/i
Did I miss something in the docs?
I'd have written this (witch char classes) as:
body LOCAL_SHOCKING_PHOTOS /\bsh[0o]ck[1i]ng ph[0o]t[0o][sz]/i
(by the wa
I'm trying to upgrade our SA install to 2.55, but when I try to use CPAN
I get a whole bunch of errors:
t/basic_lint.t11 100.00% 1
t/db_awl_path.t 41 25.00% 3
t/db_based_whitelist.t81 12.50% 1
t/db_based_wh
Hi, i've attahced a very tricky SPAM mail that has been scored with 0.8
points, what can be done with this kind of SPAM?.
Thanks
German
Bueno, primero que nada, por fin aparece otro argentino en la lista! Ya
creía que era el único que tiraba para estos lados...
Segundo, dále al sa-learn sobre el m
On 07/10/03 14:02 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> So in your case you might do:
>
> dns_available test: optonline.net
>
I did this:
dns_available test: 167.206.3.216
... which is the server shown in nslookup.
I also have
nameserver 167.206.3.216
nameserver 167.206.7.4
nameserver 167.206.112
> -Original Message-
> From: VonEssen, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spam with no body...
>
>
> I have been seeing this sort of spam come up on several different mail
> servers I work on.
>
> The emai
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:53:01AM -0300, German Staltari wrote:
> > Hi, i've attahced a very tricky SPAM mail that has been scored with 0.8
> > points, what can be done with this kind of SPAM?.
I see you're not using Razor, DCC or RBLs. I'll bet if you had it would've
been hit hard - they make
Hi,
Now I am facing a problem with hams.
Some advertising mails are legitimate mails that the user did
subscribe to receive it.
The problem is that it looks like spam, uses spams techniques
(like "web_bugs"), it smells like spam. But it isn't.
Some of this mails are getting even medium scores
At 11:53 AM 7/10/2003 -0300, German Staltari wrote:
Hi, i've attahced a very tricky SPAM mail that has been scored with 0.8
points, what can be done with this kind of SPAM?.
Thanks
German
This kind of spam is admittedly very well suited to bayes, as someone else
already noted, but there are rules
I have been seeing this sort of spam come up on several different mail
servers I work on.
The email is definitely spam and it tests positive for a few RBL, but
not enough to raise its score significantly. The one I got the other day
only scored 2.9.
I know that on my system I send back a 554 User
I am trying to feed sa-learn some spam/ham and I was wondering
something...
Can I feed sa-learn ONE file that contains a large number of emails? I
ask this because I use Evolution and sort my mail into folders. Now
instead of saving each mail one-at-a-time I want to highlight all of
them and then
I'm attempting to run SA 2.55 after a manual
install. I'm running qmail with vpopmail with sql support for user and
domain info.
I've installed everything from the docs and from
the FAQs, and am using qmail-scanner with spamassassin support to get and tag
the mail.
spamd appears to be r
Depends on what kind of setup you're looking for. Here's a good start
for using spamd with .qmail files
http://www.gbnet.net/~jrg/qmail/ifspamh/
Thanks,
--Dan--
On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 10:06 AM, Jose M.Herrera wrote:
Where I can Find documentation about integration of spamassassin and
Personally I use Clamav, and it works like a charm.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:33 AM
To: Thomas Cameron
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Thomas,
> Can anyone make a recommendation as to an AV package, preferably one
> whic
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:23:25PM -0400, Rick Macdougall is rumored to have said:
>
> Ummm, except for the fact that MailScanner in and of itself is not a
> virus scanner. Points for trying though.
Doh! I misread the original mail. I thought he was looking for a scanning mechanism,
not the sc
John P Verel wrote:
In Mail::SpamSssassin::Conf, there's the option called dns_available. I
want to point this to my ISP's DNS server to speed up the RBL checks.
However, I'm unclear of the syntax of this option, shown as:
dns_available test: server1.ltd, etc.
Can someone clarify how to set this
Thomas Cameron wrote:
> > Can anyone make a recommendation as to an AV package, preferably one
> > which
> > can be built into an (S)RPM without too terribly much work and which
> > will
> > play nice with Sendmail?
Get the PERL module File::Scan and load it. Then get the MimeDefang package
an
Steve Thomas wrote:
Doh! I misread the original mail. I thought he was looking for a scanning mechanism, not the scanner itself.
Revised recommendation:
MailScanner and Sophos. :)
I replied to him off list cause I thought it was OT, but I'll repost my
recommendation here just for fun.
Since h
> -Original Message-
> From: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] tricky spam
>
>
> Hi, i've attahced a very tricky SPAM mail that has been
> scored with 0.8
> points, what can be done with this k
I know it is one of them as the files are
owned by the account that these programs
run as. I installed temp-watch but it is
not much help other than seeing the file
creation and deletion. It would be very
nice to have something like that to show
the process name the actually created the
file.
Tha
I like to make lots of custom rules (I gratifying watching how effective they can be).
I have several that I update with porn words that spammers try to be clever with. In
your case:
body CLEVER_P0RN/(?:sexua1|0rgies|ph0t0s|sch00l)/i
Notice that they use one's for the letter L, zero's
At 09:25 AM 7/10/2003 +0200, Timothée HESPEL wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if we can use sa-learn --spam on tagged spam, or just
on non-detected spam.
Thanks
Timothée HESPEL
In general, sa-learn should be fed a nice balanced diet of all kinds of
spam, tagged and otherwise.
However feeding i
Where I can Find documentation about integration of spamassassin and qmail.
Thanks
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bullet
Greetings.
In Mail::SpamSssassin::Conf, there's the option called dns_available. I
want to point this to my ISP's DNS server to speed up the RBL checks.
However, I'm unclear of the syntax of this option, shown as:
dns_available test: server1.ltd, etc.
Can someone clarify how to set this up?
Th
On Jul 9, 2003 01:47 am, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:24:55AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> ...
>
> > Certainly my initial impression after 24 hours is that DCC is the
> > most effective, followed by RAZOR2, followed by PYZOR. All
> > together is probably most effective of co
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:53:01AM -0300, German Staltari wrote:
> Hi, i've attahced a very tricky SPAM mail that has been scored with 0.8
> points, what can be done with this kind of SPAM?.
First and foremost, you can feed it to the Bayesian classifier as spam
using sa-learn. That will cause all
Hi Thomas,
Can anyone make a recommendation as to an AV package, preferably one
which
can be built into an (S)RPM without too terribly much work and which
will
play nice with Sendmail?
I'm not sure what kind of money you're willing to spend but I'll throw
a relatively low cost but very well pe
Hi, i've attahced a very tricky SPAM mail that has been scored with 0.8
points, what can be done with this kind of SPAM?.
Thanks
German
mbox
Description: Binary data
Hi Mike,
>I suspect that what we are seeing is some form of syn requests
>from sendmail??
>
>For example, I am now receiving the same sort of activity from
>another jp site:
>Jul 9 09:00:34 www kernel: Asia2 IN=eth0 OUT=
>MAC=00:d0:09:3d:69:81:00:04:5a:ef:5e:1d:08:00 SRC=202.12.30.137
>DST=192
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:33:54 +0900, alan premselaar wrote
> On 7/10/03 11:48 AM, "Mike Vanecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...snip...
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ whois uchuu.12inch.com
> > BW whois 3.4 by Bill Weinman (http://whois.bw.org/)
> > Copyright 1999-2003 William E. Weinman
> >
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 05:00:32PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:47:39PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > ConfStorageLDAP support, and if so, how do I get the patch
> > submitted into the SpamAssassin proper?
>
> As with all patches, you can submit it via bugzilla.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Stockton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:04 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Increasing bayes_msgcount and db
> I am trying to increase the bayes db and msgcount size because
> the defaults cause it to reset every hour
"false negative" -- spam deemed ham
"false positive" -- ham tagged as spam
There's probably other lingo on this list that means the same thing.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:49 P
Hello,
I'm running spamd/spamc pair. I was using popfile and it was working quite
fine. But because it was not originaly meant for blocking spam and it
doesn't have a multi-user support i'm giving spamassassin a try.
Anyways, when running the spamd/spamc pair, when i don't supply a path for
token
Original Message -
From: "Daniel Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamassassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] where to check to configure spam?
> got this from maillogusing mailscanner and spam assassin 2gether...
>
> it is just a normal em
- Original Message -
From: "Timothée HESPEL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:25 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] A simple question
> Hello,
> I would like to know if we can use sa-learn --spam on tagged spam, or
> just on non-detected spam.
> Thanks
> Timo
got this from maillogusing mailscanner and spam assassin 2gether...
it is just a normal email...how do i define whether or not i want to use any
of these spam thingy like DOUBLE_CAPSWORD, HTML_20_30...blah blah blah..
Jul 10 15:45:16 mail MailScanner[5961]: Message h6A7jBZJ009035 from
192.16
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 05:42 pm, Chris Ochap wrote:
> I know I saw the option for spamassassin/spamd to stop scanning once the
> appropriate users score has been reached, but I cannot find it again. I
> have spamd/spamc running on qmail/vpopmail/maildrop with per user
> configs. I don't see it
Hello,
I would like to know if we can use sa-learn --spam on tagged spam, or
just on non-detected spam.
Thanks
Timothée HESPEL
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing
As suggested, I started spamd with '-L' flags and things were immediately better.
So, I sniffed a few packets with all checks enabled and saw that the RBL servers were
the problem! :-/
Tx for your help,
Xavier
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...Oh, wait a minut
89 matches
Mail list logo
