How exactly did you determine what your hit percentage was for DCC,Razor and your RBL's? Could you send me more information on how you accomplished this, as I would like to analyze the results on my mail server. >> >> I've got a similar impression with my corpuses here, the DCC hit >> rate appears higher than razor. One big advantage is you can run >> your own DCC server and don't have to rely on the wonderful folks >> who do an excellent job keeping the razor servers up (most of the >> time.) > > Looking at all spams received here recently (1103 total), I found the > following hit totals for Razor2 and DCC (I don't use Pyzor): > > DCC: 677 (61.4%) > Razor2: 563 (51.0%) > > The various RBL checks ranked as follows: > > NJABL: 742 (67.3%) > DSBL: 491 (44.5%) > OSIRUSOFT: 446 (40.4%) > OPM: 280 (25.4%) > RFCI: 158 (14.3%) > > And, for the Bayes scores: > > BAYES_99: 2.4% > BAYES_90: 71.5% > BAYES_80: 14.3% > BAYES_70: 7.9% > BAYES_60: 3.9% > BAYES_50 or less: none > > Bayes has been trained with 5200/6200 ham/spams. > > During the period that the 1103 spams accumulated, there was 1 FN and > 0 FPs. This is great performance. > > To the SA developers, I say: bravo! > > Barry > > -- > Barry McLarnon VE3JF Ottawa, ON > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
