On Jul 10, 2003 05:40 pm, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> However, are you able to generate any stats for the above tests
> (from the same period of time) for how often they triggered in
> *ham* ? EG so we can get an idea of the false positive rates of
> DCC, razor, and the various RBL's....sometimes the false positive
> rate is more important than the false negative rate. (Which
> effectively what your stats are displaying)

I didn't keep a complete corpus of ham received during the same 
period of time, so I can't generate any meaningful stats.  However, 
checking through a fairly sizeable collection of ham received in the 
last few months, I found a handful of RBL hits, but no FPs from 
either DCC or Razor2, and no Bayes scores higher than BAYES_70.

Barry

-- 
Barry McLarnon  VE3JF   Ottawa, ON
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to