Hi,

Now I am facing a problem with hams.

Some advertising mails are legitimate mails that the user did
subscribe to receive it.
The problem is that it looks like spam, uses spams techniques
(like "web_bugs"), it smells like spam.  But it isn't.

Some of this mails are getting even medium scores like
10 to 15 points.
Some get BAYES_90 or BAYES_99 scores.
To make things worse a few is listed in some open RBLs.

I donīt know the inners of the Bayesian database, but I think that
if I fed it as ham to the database I would make the bayesian filter
less efficient.  Is this true?

So, how do you balance this kind of situation?
Is whitelisting the only way to go?

Regards,

Raul Dias




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to