Hi,
Now I am facing a problem with hams. Some advertising mails are legitimate mails that the user did subscribe to receive it. The problem is that it looks like spam, uses spams techniques (like "web_bugs"), it smells like spam. But it isn't. Some of this mails are getting even medium scores like 10 to 15 points. Some get BAYES_90 or BAYES_99 scores. To make things worse a few is listed in some open RBLs. I donīt know the inners of the Bayesian database, but I think that if I fed it as ham to the database I would make the bayesian filter less efficient. Is this true? So, how do you balance this kind of situation? Is whitelisting the only way to go? Regards, Raul Dias ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk