On Jul 10, 2003 05:40 pm, Simon Byrnand wrote: > However, are you able to generate any stats for the above tests > (from the same period of time) for how often they triggered in > *ham* ? EG so we can get an idea of the false positive rates of > DCC, razor, and the various RBL's....sometimes the false positive > rate is more important than the false negative rate. (Which > effectively what your stats are displaying)
I didn't keep a complete corpus of ham received during the same period of time, so I can't generate any meaningful stats. However, checking through a fairly sizeable collection of ham received in the last few months, I found a handful of RBL hits, but no FPs from either DCC or Razor2, and no Bayes scores higher than BAYES_70.
Ok...
So far I havn't seen any FP's from DCC, but I've only been running it for a few days.
Razor2 on the other hand does sometimes give me FP's, one thing in particular is messages from Incredimail seem to trigger Razor....
(yes I know incredimail is incredibly spammy in the way it sends messages, it triggers a lot of SA rules too :)
Regards, Simon
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
