Thanks!
I really appreciate all the feedback. My blacklist is ever growing.. I
run qmail, and I look at the queues every morning.. The biggest issue is
that one of the domains hosted on my system used to have free webmail
hosting via Everyone.net ... HUGE mistake! They obviously sell the email
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 11:33 AM +1200 Simon Byrnand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 10:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back
about 2.55 having a problem with RBL?
No,
It's just that by an extremely annoying co-incidenc
Search on sourceforge appears totally screwed..
Every so often I see this in my maillog -
May 18 07:42:06 relay spamd[18036]: Cannot open bayes_path
/home/filter/.spamassassin/bayes R/W: File exists
May 18 07:42:06 relay spamd[18036]: identified spam (50.0/5.0) for
filter:500 in 11.6 seconds, 834
John Stewart wrote on Wed, 28 May 2003 16:09:05 -0500:
> You want the headers! Bayes uses these.
That's correct, but if you look at a spamassassin -D output you see that the
header information usually plays a marginal role. From a typical message you
may have 1 - 3 matches in the headers but ab
i luv it,
it has been working flawless for me
using suse 8.2
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
__
Ben M. VanWagner wrote on Wed, 28 May 2003 14:48:09 -0500:
> How about adding a section in the HOWTO that lists customizing the
> message as a CRUCIAL step in configuring the software.
>
cvs-2.60 includes now a routine which asks for a custom email address or
URL.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin
A few weeks ago I thought of an interesting new "statistical" way of
fighting spam. Having collected a few weeks worth of maillog data (about 500
MB), I wrote a small Perl script, matching IP addresses by the following
simple rule (in words):
"Look at SMTP connections, and consider all IP addresse
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Stuart Gall wrote:
> > The ideal way to do it would be to send out all the queries in parallel
> > (asyncronously) at the start of the SA run, and receive the replies during
> > the rbl_timeout period, so only those which actually did time out will fail
> > to run. I have a
> The ideal way to do it would be to send out all the queries in parallel
> (asyncronously) at the start of the SA run, and receive the replies during
> the rbl_timeout period, so only those which actually did time out will fail
> to run. I have a suspicion this is not the way it works now howev
- Original Message -
From: "Michael J. Kidd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:29 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Worried about RBLs
> Hi all,
> I run a server which hosts several sites. I've been using
> Spamassassin for a while now, and absolutely love
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Ng
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:52 PM
>
> I noticed that spams fall through after I upgraded to spamassassin 2.54, and
> when I look closer, it doesn't look like spamassassin even tags them.
>
> I turned on procmail logging and verbose mode and thi
I've started getting this message intermittently in the syslog on my
small server. Spamd/SA 2.53 on Debian stable. If I look at the
directory, the file doesn't exist. Does this happen if spamd gets
called twice at nearly same time? Surely not?
SA generally seems to be working but I feel I s
I noticed that spams fall through after I upgraded to spamassassin 2.54, and
when I look closer, it doesn't look like spamassassin even tags them.
I turned on procmail logging and verbose mode and this is what it saids ...
procmail: Locking "spamassassin.lock"
procmail: Executing "/usr/local/b
HI,
On Wed, 28 May 2003 22:52:32 -0500 (CDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In short, yes there are a lot of ignorant people that look no farther than
> the From: line. Fortunately DNSBL maintainers are stupid enough to let a
> single (l)user dictate what they put into their BL.
Are you missing a
Quoting "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >I'm currently using qmail+vpopmail with spamc+spamd to check for spam. As
> > of
> > >right now, in each of the domains' .qmail-default files in
> ~vpopmail/domain,
>
Hi,
On Wed, 28 May 2003 22:29:04 -0400
"Michael J. Kidd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I run a server which hosts several sites. I've been using
> Spamassassin for a while now, and absolutely love it. I know this may
> be slightly off topic, but I figured I'd start here.
>
> I've
Quoting AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I'm currently using qmail+vpopmail with spamc+spamd to check for spam. As
> of
> >right now, in each of the domains' .qmail-default files in ~vpopmail/domain,
> I
> >have been manually appending:
> >
> >| /usr/qmail/sa/usr/bi
ons, 28.05.2003 kl. 09.46 skrev Tony Earnshaw:
> Is changed in 2.50-CVS, last night's version (wasn't a couple of days
> ago.).
2.60-CVS.
Tony
--
Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equi
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Michael J. Kidd wrote:
> Hi all,
> I run a server which hosts several sites. I've been using
> Spamassassin for a while now, and absolutely love it. I know this may
> be slightly off topic, but I figured I'd start here.
>
> I've recently noticed a barrage of 'Mailer-dae
>
> I don't suppose someone out there could tell me how to tell procmail to
> simply accept the message and stop processing?
>
Generally, just deliver it to $DEFAULT. Something like this (towards
the beginning of your procmailrc):
FROM=`formail -rx To: | sed -e 's/^[ ]*//'`
REALLY_FROM=`forma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently using qmail+vpopmail with spamc+spamd to check for spam. As of
right now, in each of the domains' .qmail-default files in ~vpopmail/domain, I
have been manually appending:
| /usr/qmail/sa/usr/bin/spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] -e
/usr/local/vpopmail/bin/vdeliver
I'm currently using qmail+vpopmail with spamc+spamd to check for spam. As of
right now, in each of the domains' .qmail-default files in ~vpopmail/domain, I
have been manually appending:
| /usr/qmail/sa/usr/bin/spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] -e
/usr/local/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailb
Jack Gostl wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
The whitelists within spamassassin are rules and as such it simply adds
-100 to the message score.
The way to get an absolute whitelist that aborts processing is the
configure procmail, o
Hi all,
I run a server which hosts several sites. I've been using
Spamassassin for a while now, and absolutely love it. I know this may
be slightly off topic, but I figured I'd start here.
I've recently noticed a barrage of 'Mailer-daemon' messages in my mail
queues. These messages are in r
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > The whitelists within spamassassin are rules and as such it simply adds
> > -100 to the message score.
> >
> > The way to get an absolute whitelist that aborts processing is the
> > configure procmail, or w
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The whitelists within spamassassin are rules and as such it simply adds
> -100 to the message score.
>
> The way to get an absolute whitelist that aborts processing is the
> configure procmail, or whatever other tool you use, to not even call SA in
>
Could you begin by describing how you installed spamassassin? What kind of
system did you install it on? What MTA are you using?
Merely installing from the tarball or CPAN will not insert SA into your
mail delivery path. You need to edit procmail configs, install a milter,
amavis, mailscanner o
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:12 PM -0700 Kelsey Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:25:49AM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> I have seen this pop up before but with no real answer. If you have 2
> relay
> What I would like to do is to redirect all the spam-tagged mail to
> either a local user or to /dev/null.
I'm using the envelope milter (http://www.chaos.org.uk/~richard/sw/) to
redirect tagged messages to an alternate e-mail address on my Lotus Domino
mail server. (Since Domino mail stores a
The whitelists within spamassassin are rules and as such it simply adds
-100 to the message score.
The way to get an absolute whitelist that aborts processing is the
configure procmail, or whatever other tool you use, to not even call SA in
the first place. You'll get more performance boost tha
> >I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back
> >about 2.55 having a problem with RBL?
>
> No,
>
> It's just that by an extremely annoying co-incidence, one of the RBL
lists
> used by SA (all recent versions) died only a couple of days after 2.55's
> release, causing
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 19:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
> >On Thu, 29 May 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> >
> > > At 10:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > >
> > > >I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back
> > > >about 2.55 having a
At 19:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 10:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> >I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back
> >about 2.55 having a problem with RBL?
>
> No,
>
> It's just that by an extremely annoyi
I stoped to receive e-mails on
my mail server.. It was working perfect before.. I think this problem came when
I tried to install spamassassin... When I send e-mails from my domain to
another domain that is hosted in my server it goes with no problems, but when
some one else tries, I dont r
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 10:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> >I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back
> >about 2.55 having a problem with RBL?
>
> No,
>
> It's just that by an extremely annoying co-incidence, one of the RBL lists
>
--On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:52 AM +0900 alan premselaar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
to make a long story short, what you want to do is setup a cron job that
runs sa-learn --rebuild (run this as your defang user) probably once an
hour or so. This was suggested by someone on the MIMEDefang list
At 10:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back
about 2.55 having a problem with RBL?
No,
It's just that by an extremely annoying co-incidence, one of the RBL lists
used by SA (all recent versions) died only a couple of days aft
*FLAME ON*
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:39 PM -0700 Kelson Vibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Mike Batchelor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I posted this to the MIMEDefang list, but didn't get a response. Let me
try here.
Perhaps because people were already discussing the same issue in anot
If something is added to whitelist_from, does it actually reduce
processing time or does it simply push the score way down? It would be
nice if it didn't eat CPU cycles.
--
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsore
At 15:29 28/05/03 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
From: Simon Byrnand
| Unfortunately no, sendmail, at least up to version 8.11.x doesn't have any
| inbuilt way to throttle the local delivery rate.
| You have:
| QueueLA ... MaxDaemonChildren ... ConnectionRateThrottle ...
|
| None of these address the
At 19:23 27/05/03 -0400, Christopher M. Iarocci wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees
> > that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it never
is.
>
> Here's an id
At 09:26 27/05/03 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
man, 26.05.2003 kl. 23.37 skrev Simon Byrnand:
> >Keep your SA version up to date! What you write above certainly isn't
> >the case for SA 2.60-CVS, the rules for which, coupled with Bayes and
> >RBL checks, catch even the shortest of base64 and obfusc
I saw it in a NANAE post earlier today: "Latest in spam disclaimers"
http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=vd9ofpqmhjtc72%40corp.supernews.com&prev=/groups%3Fdq%3D%26num%3D25%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26group%3Dnews.admin.net-abuse.email%26start
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Derek C. wrote:
> *Ahem* As acting president of the "IMRO" (actually means the International
> Mentally Retarded Organization)
I bet your organization has a lot of members from the great US state of
Florida... :)
Justin
--
Alex, your script currently doesn't do qmail so I modified it to just
parsing the spamd logs and redid the part that gets the number of clean
and spam messages - that together with mrtg and a few other perl and sh
bit an pieces that run in cron is what i use to create this report
page. I am
*Ahem* As acting president of the "IMRO" (actually means the International
Mentally Retarded Organization) I have granted all spammers clemency for
one month due to the fact that they are obviously incapable of telling
right from wrong, up from down, or a good marketing technique from one that
Saw this thread about it on usenet.. not particularly relevant, but shows
that this has been around for a little bit.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=8e3e4c1f.0304141212.492870e9%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3D%2522International%2BMessaging%2BRe
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 03:20:26PM -0700, Support wrote:
> doesn't setting "use_bayes 0" mean "don't enable bayes"
yes.
> and yes they do come back.
hmmm. then I would run with -D and see what it's doing. perhaps it's
either not reading that config file for some reason, or there's another
It might be pointed out to the ISP that you need to add someone to your
whitelist, and ask them how to do it. Another way of handling it, since
SpamAssassin only marks mail and doesn't delete it, is to set up filters
in your email client to move messages marked SPAM (I like to do it using
X-SPAM Le
Sorry I meant SA 2.53.
doesn't setting "use_bayes 0" mean "don't enable bayes"
and yes they do come back.
thanx,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Theo Van
Dinter
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Support
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, good news for large site-wide bayes dbs: Theo has implemented a way
to avoid auto-expiry in 2.60. The plan is that expiry can be disabled by
setting bayes_expiry_max_db_size to 0.
Then folks who wish to do an expiry from cron, can control this by using
a config file which uses e.g. "bayes_
Hi,
On Wed, 28 May 2003 13:29:26 -0700 "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob Apthorpe
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:37 AM
> >
> [...]
> > You may want to look into running
> > SpamAssassin with MIMEDefang ( http://www.roaringpengui
Hi,
On Wed, 28 May 2003 16:16:44 -0400
"Shayne Lebrun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nslookup relays.monkeys.com
>
> Server: black.MUSKOKA.COM
> Address: 216.123.107.2
>
> Name:relays.monkeys.com
>
> Relays.monkeys.com doesn't currently have an IP addy assigned to it, looks
> like.
Commo
Here's a new spammer disclaimer that needs a new home.
Justin
This e-mail message is considered to be fully legal.
The IMRO (International Messaging Regulation Organization) latest
regulation says that it is legal to send mass messages one time for
month. E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for total remo
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 04:45:16PM +0200, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
> > Alex,
> >
> > I'd like to help, since no-one answered, you're Dutch ("sniff, sniff
> > Nobody loves me") and anyway I've been through the whole gamut of
> > learning Postscript and SA, from filter to spampd to amavisd-new.
Sorry all.
its late here..
i posted to the wrong list...
My apologies. :o$
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Tom Kinghorn
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:29 PM
Subject: problem with address rewriting
Hi all.
Please can someone point me in the
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 09:02:22AM -0500, Tom Meunier wrote:
> He wants to parse his maillog file to throw away everything but the "processing
> message and the "identified spam" lines. Then he can go back and look
> at for troubleshooting purposes. He has a feeling that he can't count
> o
- Original Message -
From: "Stewart, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Stuart Gall'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Per Björklund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:09 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn on messages from outlook/exchange
>
> > > I was wonderin
Hi all.
Please can someone point me in the right
direction.
I have a number of domains going to 1 exchange
server.
I have set up address rewriting in the form of a
dsearch which works okay.
The problem is that I need to duplicate all users
for the primary domain into files of the other
> > I was wondering if it could be possible to get sa-learn to
> just look at the message text
> > and ignore all header information when I feed it with
> messages from exchange (since exchange screws everything up).
> >
> > That way all users on the exchange-system could just
> forward their
> I think there maybe be problems with the public folder
> solution in Exchange 2000. While it appears to work under
> Exchange 5.5, in Exchange 2000 it seems that all mail stored
> in public folders and accessed through IMAP or POP loses a
> lot of its header information, at least in my expe
Well, "system wide prefs for sa-learn" doesn't really make much sense...
Except with respect to changing the default bayes DB paths..
Those preferences are set in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf just like
spamassassin itself.
see man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf for different things you can put in
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:25:49AM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > I have seen this pop up before but with no real answer. If you have 2
> > relay servers with equal MX costs sitting on the perimiter running SA,
> > how do you hav
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Schrauder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Darren Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "SpamA (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:14 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SPAM
> >From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2
- Original Message -
From: "Dianne Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:21 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] SPAM
> You are identifying SPAM mail that is legitimate information from an
> important source to me. Please remove it.
>
> Dianne S. Moore Ph.D.
> > All I ever get is
> > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_NJABL ==> got hit
> > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM ==> got hit
> > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG ==> got hit
> > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_UNCONFI
> Aha... my cron job was not quite right; it was only doing a
> --force-expire on the hour when there had been spam/ham
> learned. I've set it to do it every hour regardless.
> Hopefully then amavisd-new won't cause SA to run an
> opportunistic scan.
>
> We shall see!
>
> I hope this works,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jose M. Herrera
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:22 PM
>
> Why is necesary put DROPPRIVS=yes in /etc/procmailrc ???
>
> What is DROPPRIVS for?
From "man procmailrc":
DROPPRIVS If set to `yes' procmail will drop all privileges it
might
On 28 May 2003, Louis Bohm wrote:
> Can one of the SA developers please respond to this and give a definit
> "Yes it can/No it cannot be done" answer.
>
> I currently have a mailbox containing 2 SPAM mails that were not
> marked as such and about 1000 HAMS marked as spam. Can I really just
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:26:25AM -0700, Support wrote:
> How can I completely stop SA 2.43 from using bayes?
You can't, 2.43 doesn't have bayes. Or did you mean 2.53?
> use_bayes 0
that's it right there.
> however, in user profiles there are bayes files in my ~/.spamassassin/
Has anyone successfully implemented spamassassin with Sopho MailMonitor
and Sendmail?
--
Dana Holland[EMAIL PROTECTED] 903-875-7355
Navarro CollegeCorsicana, TX
http://www.navarrocollege.edu/staff_pages/dana/dana.html
**
I think there maybe be problems with the public folder solution in Exchange 2000.
While it appears to work under Exchange 5.5, in Exchange 2000 it seems that all mail
stored in public folders and accessed through IMAP or POP loses a lot of its header
information, at least in my experience. I
From
http://web.bilkent.edu.tr/mirrors/Sendmail/www.wolfenet.com/%257Ejhardin/procmail-security.html:
Note that the DROPPRIVS at the beginning means the log file must be writable
by the recipient.
Thomas
- Original Message -
From: "Jose M.Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
nslookup relays.monkeys.com
Server: black.MUSKOKA.COM
Address: 216.123.107.2
Name:relays.monkeys.com
Relays.monkeys.com doesn't currently have an IP addy assigned to it, looks
like.
www.monkeys.com, on the other hand
Muskoka.com
115 Manitoba Street
Bracebridge, Ontario
P1L 2B6
(705)6
Hi Bob,
Excellent info. thanks.
Got a qeustion on MIME defang. I'm thinking of installing it, along with a
caching name daemon, in a month/so. But, I'm not sure how to best set things
up in our configuration:
Internet (ISP) ---> Firewall (Linux/sendmail *internal* relay) >
(continued f
- Original Message -
From: "Per Björklund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:09 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] sa-learn on messages from outlook/exchange
> I was wondering if it could be possible to get sa-learn to just look at the message
> text
> and i
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Guenthner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:35 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Strange spamc problem with SA 2.54 and qmail
> Hello list
>
> I call spamc via a script called /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue with the
> following
Hi,
stupid questions: how set system wide prefs for sa-learn?
I cannot find any help in doc.
Thanks
iNet WebMail System
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http
For those people wanting to implement side wide SA but allow elective removal in an
ISP situation you can make a very very simple change to your /etc/procmailrc
:0
* ! ? test -f $HOME/.sabypass
{
:0fw
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc -f
}
then to bypass a user from SA just
touch /home/bubba/.saby
Hi,
It has? That's news to my dns...
@40003ed514501c91686c rblsmtpd: 200.171.247.234 pid 21909: 553
BLOCKED: See
http://www.monkeys.com/upl/listed-ip-0.cgi?ip=200.171.247.234
Regards,
Rick
Joseph Noonan wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2003 at 12:36pm Bob Apthorpe wrote:
*.relays.monkeys.com
hav
Can one of the SA developers please respond to this and give a definit
"Yes it can/No it cannot be done" answer.
I currently have a mailbox containing 2 SPAM mails that were not
marked as such and about 1000 HAMS marked as spam. Can I really just
pump them into SA with out causing any probl
Stop smoking Crack :-), I was being figurative. I don't literally mean that everyone
should send an apology email to every moron in this world. Obviously that would take
to long. A simple change once and for all to the SA report that places the blame on
the ISP and does not refer them to SA w
> John scrawled:
> > One thing I was doing every hour was an sa-learn --rebuild,
> > but I wasn't
> > doing a --force-expire. I'm going to put that in place to run
> > every hour as
> > well and perhaps an hourly expire will help things out. We
> shall see.
>
> Well, it apparently has not.
>
Why is necesary put DROPPRIVS=yes in /etc/procmailrc ???
What is DROPPRIVS for?
Thanks
--
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
Jose Miguel Herrera M. - User #246070 counter.li.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Est.Ing.Civil Informatica - UTFSM
Servicios Centrales - Depto.I
At 11:21 AM 05/28/2003, Dianne Moore wrote:
You are identifying SPAM mail that is legitimate information from an
important source to me. Please remove it.
Dianne S. Moore Ph.D., R.N.,C.N.M.,M.N.,M.P.H.
Director of Nursing
Fresno City College
1101 East University Ave
Department of Nursing
Fresno C
>From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:45 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SPAM
>The one thing I don't understand about emails like these, is that if the
>person is intelligent enough to find the mailinglist address to email -
>how is it
> Please correct me if I am wrong. But I thought I saw a
> posting a while
> back (when 2.50 came out) that doing what you are doing would
> shift the
> balance of the Bayes DB toward one side or another. I
> remember someone
> clearly stating that you need an equal amount of SPAM and HAM to
> I just kept adding zeroes one at a time 'til it worked... and
> I had to
> go that high on the system I'm using it on. Maybe I've got
> some other
> weird bug going on.
>
MEEP! You've just multiplied memory usage by a factor of ten for each zero.
A softlimit of 400 - 600 is us
I had this happen once.. it was spamd messin up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evan
Platt
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Jim Ford; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Multiple postings!
At 09:43 AM 05/28/2003, you wrote:
>
Good afternoon, Chris,
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I don't know what's funnier. The fact that we keep getting these posts, or
> the sig quote you responded with to Diane! :)
Ouch! I have a random sig generator at
http://www.stearns.org/randomsig/ . I usually try to fi
On Wed, 28 May 2003 at 12:36pm Bob Apthorpe wrote:
>
> Also, consider rejecting mail from sites listed on certain
> DNSBLs (opm.blitzed.org, proxies.relays.monkeys.com,
*.relays.monkeys.com
have been down for some time now.
--
Joseph F. Noonan
Rigaku/MSC Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dianne,
You need to speak to your email provider –
your ISP or hosting provider – they are the ones who are filtering your
email using the SpamAssassin software. No one on this mailing list has any
direct authority, influence or control over your email and how it is handled.
Kind
Ralf,
Did you see my recent thread titled "Some observations on doing more with
less"?
I ran some tests trying different cut off points. I think it's possible
that 1 will work for you, but you need to send the first and the last
parts of the message off to spamc, rather than just the first part
The one thing I don’t understand
about emails like these, is that if the person is intelligent enough to find
the mailinglist address to email – how is it that they don’t
realise that SA isn’t an all-encompassing filter for the Worlds email?
Daz
-Original Message-
From
I don't know what's funnier. The fact that we keep getting these posts, or
the sig quote you responded with to Diane! :)
> -Original Message-
> From: William Stearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:29 PM
> To: Dianne Moore; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: ML-spamassassi
Hi,
How can I completely stop SA 2.43 from using bayes?
my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf has this.
-
# Enable the Bayes system
use_bayes 0
# Enable Bayes auto-learning
auto_learn 0
# Enable or disable network checks
skip_rbl_checks
Good afternoon, Diane,
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Dianne Moore wrote:
> You are identifying SPAM mail that is legitimate information from an
> important source to me. Please remove it.
We can't. Your ISP (I assume that's scccd.com) installed the
spamassassin program on their mail server. Yo
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Stuart Gall wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "SpamAssassin listserve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:40 PM
> Subject: [SAtalk] 2.53 vs 2.55
>
>
> >
> > I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there s
You are identifying
SPAM mail that is legitimate information from an important source to me. Please
remove it.
Dianne S. Moore Ph.D.,
R.N.,C.N.M.,M.N.,M.P.H.
Director of Nursing
Fresno City College
1101 East University Ave
Department of Nursing
Fresno CA 93741
559 244 2685 office
559 244 26
At 09:43 AM 05/28/2003, you wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting multiple postings on this list - some of them as much as 13
duplicates!
Regards: Jim Ford
P.S. Is thsi sort of thing regarded as 'spam'?
Only one I see is from Sergei Genchev, sent twice, 09:13 and 09:15. My
guess is it was a accidental resend.
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
