On 28 May 2003, Louis Bohm wrote: > Can one of the SA developers please respond to this and give a definit > "Yes it can/No it cannot be done" answer. > > I currently have a mailbox containing 20000 SPAM mails that were not > marked as such and about 1000 HAMS marked as spam. Can I really just > pump them into SA with out causing any problems??????
I'm not a developer, but that is exactly what I did. I'm not sure what your hardware is like, but I'd put my money on 8-10 hours. > > Thanks, > Louis > > On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 15:15, Stewart, John wrote: > > > Please correct me if I am wrong. But I thought I saw a > > > posting a while > > > back (when 2.50 came out) that doing what you are doing would > > > shift the > > > balance of the Bayes DB toward one side or another. I > > > remember someone > > > clearly stating that you need an equal amount of SPAM and HAM to do > > > this. > > > > Well, in practice I found it worked quite well. We did the public folder > > thing on our Exchange server. > > > > However, I had to disable Bayes because SA 2.55 won't stop trying to expire, > > causing amavisd-new to time out, ad infinitum. Apparently there is no way to > > stop SA from opportunistically expiring, nor is there any way to force an > > expire with sa-learn! > > And SA *sucks* without bayes. =( > > > > johnS > -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
