On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:25:49AM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: > > I have seen this pop up before but with no real answer. If you have 2 > > relay servers with equal MX costs sitting on the perimiter running SA, > > how do you have it so they both share and update an "in-sync" db so that > > both relay servers have up to date Bayes DBs? > > > > I remember reading that nfs wont work b/c of the flock() call, so there > > must be another means no? > > To my knowledge (I haven't looked at the code) the Bayes DBs use the same > locking code as the AWL which is specificaly NFS safe. So, either rewrite > it for SQL (and let us all know) or use NFS like we do.
Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery host instead of the MX hosts? (I'm assume that both of your MX servers must forward the mail to a central server.) -- Kelsey Cummings - [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonic.net System Administrator 2260 Apollo Way 707.522.1000 (Voice) Santa Rosa, CA 95407 707.547.2199 (Fax) http://www.sonic.net/ Fingerprint = 7F 59 43 1B 44 8A 0D 57 91 08 73 73 7A 48 90 C5 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
