On Thu, 29 May 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote: > At 10:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote: > > >I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back > >about 2.55 having a problem with RBL? > > No, > > It's just that by an extremely annoying co-incidence, one of the RBL lists > used by SA (all recent versions) died only a couple of days after 2.55's > release, causing timeouts for people... > > I certainly havn't noticed any RBL issues with 2.55, other than the above, > and as far as I know nothing was touched in that area of code....
I'm surpressing the urge to make a cute remark about "nothing was touched in that area of code". (G) Too many years in this business makes me superstitious. So... that still leaves the mystery that 2.55 seems slightly less discriminator thay 2.60. Let's let this drop until I have a few thousand spams caught and then I'll pick it up if its warrantted. Thanks. -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
