Can one of the SA developers please respond to this and give a definit "Yes it can/No it cannot be done" answer.
I currently have a mailbox containing 20000 SPAM mails that were not marked as such and about 1000 HAMS marked as spam. Can I really just pump them into SA with out causing any problems?????? Thanks, Louis On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 15:15, Stewart, John wrote: > > Please correct me if I am wrong. But I thought I saw a > > posting a while > > back (when 2.50 came out) that doing what you are doing would > > shift the > > balance of the Bayes DB toward one side or another. I > > remember someone > > clearly stating that you need an equal amount of SPAM and HAM to do > > this. > > Well, in practice I found it worked quite well. We did the public folder > thing on our Exchange server. > > However, I had to disable Bayes because SA 2.55 won't stop trying to expire, > causing amavisd-new to time out, ad infinitum. Apparently there is no way to > stop SA from opportunistically expiring, nor is there any way to force an > expire with sa-learn! > And SA *sucks* without bayes. =( > > johnS -- - -- --- ¤¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤øø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤øø¤º°`°º¤ ¤°`°Lightbridge, Inc ¤°`°67 South Bedford St. ¤°`°Burlington MA 01802 ¤°`°781.359.4795 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ¤°`°http://www.lightbridge.com ¤¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤øø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤øø¤º°`°º¤ NHY隊X'uz ~' zg+,wk(miڮiv&\ow$u^u딩jf,{ZIXX*Z,j"֥X( ~zwilqzlX)ߣ)jf,{Z
