On Wed, 28 May 2003, Jack Gostl wrote:this was posted earlier today
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
The whitelists within spamassassin are rules and as such it simply adds -100 to the message score.Great idea! I'll dig it out of the procmail docs.
The way to get an absolute whitelist that aborts processing is the configure procmail, or whatever other tool you use, to not even call SA in the first place. You'll get more performance boost that way than anything that could be done in SA anyway.
I don't suppose someone out there could tell me how to tell procmail to simply accept the message and stop processing?
At 07:27 PM 5/28/2003 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
If something is added to whitelist_from, does it actually reduce
processing time or does it simply push the score way down? It would be
nice if it didn't eat CPU cycles.
:0
* ! ? test -f $HOME/.sabypass
{
:0fw
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc -fthen if you want to enable the bypass for a user
touch /home/bubba/.sabypass
where /home/bubba is the users home directory
}
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
