> > All I ever get is > > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_NJABL ======> got hit > > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM ======> got hit > > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG ======> got hit > > debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL ======> got hit > > > > or nothing. > > Is that right ??? > > Well, so far its just a memory of a thread I thought I saw combined with > the fact that none of the false negatives have had any RBL hits. Its not > statistically significant yet.
My sample was significant, and I was looking through the spam for RBL tags but I could not find any. And I know I was getting hundreds of rejects per week. > > Frankly, I'm getting spoiled. On 2.60cvs I was gettin 99.5-99.8%% spam > captured. On 2.55, I seem to get about 1% less. I should be embarrassed. A > month ago I would have swooned over 75%. > <Sigh> I know what you mean. Every time I get some spam through I want to analyse it, perhaps play make a new rule of play with the scores. but inevitably no system will be 100% | 0% 0% | 100% It is just impossible. I have come across a few users that actually like some of the spam they get, go figure. Stuart Gall Systems Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Critical Error: REALITY.SYS Corrupted! Reboot universe? (y/n) [y]: ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
