emails are fine.
Could someone please advise what or where I can look to resolve this
Thank you
ifty
_
From: Kunal Soni [mailto:kunalso...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 March 2013 11:45
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Qmail-scann
On 13/06/13 17:05, Kunal Soni wrote:
> Dear Jason,
>
> Thanks for the details. We have been using Spamassassin + ClamAV with
> Qmail Scanner. Please let us know the steps to configure the DLP
> Monitor with ClamAV and Qmail Scanner and How we can monitoer the
> emails with the reserved words with
Dear Jason,
Thanks for the details. We have been using Spamassassin + ClamAV with Qmail
Scanner. Please let us know the steps to configure the DLP Monitor with
ClamAV and Qmail Scanner and How we can monitoer the emails with the
reserved words with this.
Thanks again.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:
On 02/03/13 00:44, Kunal Soni wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> This is with reference to the SA:0(?/?). We have followed the given
> below solution from the list. We have tried to increase the spamc
> --max-size=10485760 (10mb), while executed the command, it doesnt
> return any output but screen is standstil
Hi Kunal
I don't understand what you mean with 'the execution of the command'.
There are two ways of changing the max-size:
1) You can reconfigure qmail-scanner (reinstalling it) adding the option
--max-size 10485760
2) Edit the file qmail-scanner-queue.pl (usually in
/var/qmail/bin/q
Hi List,
This is with reference to the SA:0(?/?). We have followed the given below
solution from the list. We have tried to increase the spamc
--max-size=10485760 (10mb), while executed the command, it doesnt return
any output but screen is standstill.
Before executing the command, we have also s
|| &error_condition("mhr: cannot open file - '$file'");
$sha->addfile(*OFILE);
my $digest = $sha->hexdigest;
debug("mhr: digest of $file is $digest",5);
$result=&MHRviaDNS($digest);
close(OFILE);
last if ($result);
}
line 3540 is : $s
;mhr: cannot open file -
'$file'");
$sha->addfile(*OFILE);
my $digest = $sha->hexdigest;
debug("mhr: digest of $file is $digest",5);
$result=&MHRviaDNS($digest);
close(OFILE);
last if ($result);
}
line 3540 is : $sha->addfile(*OFILE);
Hi Adrian
Line 3540 must be ad antivirus routine. So your antivirus couldn't
read the file.
What antivirus are you using at line 3540?
Try to increase the memory assigned to qmail-smtpd, just a guess.
ST
At 18:18 +0200 6-11-2012, Adrian Bulgariu wrote:
hi
i recently discovered those error
>>
>> Il 16/02/2012 10:56, Salvatore Toribio ha scritto:
>> > Hi Alessio
>> >
>> > I am quite busy at this time... I will try to have a look at the issue
>> > on the weekend.
>> >
>> > Just one thing:
>> >
>> > --scanners "clamdscan,verbose_spamassassin" This is a bad idea...
>>
>> Yes I know but
Il 16/02/2012 10:56, Salvatore Toribio ha scritto:
> Hi Alessio
>
> I am quite busy at this time... I will try to have a look at the issue
> on the weekend.
>
> Just one thing:
>
> --scanners "clamdscan,verbose_spamassassin" This is a bad idea...
Yes I know but is the only one method for having sp
Well it is feature or bug of QS. It happen very often, that you proceed
email by QS, client drop connection due to timeout, but QS inject email
into queue instead of dropping email, because client has closed
connection. It often happen with email, that need longer time to proceed
(+30 seconds).
Hi Alessio
I am quite busy at this time... I will try to have a look at the
issue on the weekend.
Just one thing:
--scanners "clamdscan,verbose_spamassassin" This is a bad idea...
Try with fast_spamassassin and set sa-debug and sa-report to 1, this
will give you almost the same information a
Il 16/02/2012 08:47, Jason Haar ha scritto:
> Oh - that's not qmail-scanner - that's qmail-scanner-st
>
> I'll leave it to Salvatore to leap in
>
> Jason
Ok, I'll wait Salvatore :-)
--
Alessio Cecchi is:
@ ILS -> http://www.linux.it/~alessice/
on LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice
A
Oh - that's not qmail-scanner - that's qmail-scanner-st
I'll leave it to Salvatore to leap in
Jason
On 16/02/12 20:29, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Il 16/02/2012 06:48, Jason Haar ha scritto:
>> Hi Alessio
>>
>> What you describe doesn't explain the duplicate emails. Qmail-Scanner
>> doesn't like wha
Il 16/02/2012 06:48, Jason Haar ha scritto:
> Hi Alessio
>
> What you describe doesn't explain the duplicate emails. Qmail-Scanner
> doesn't like what spamd is returning and after trying three times will
> do a "temp fail" to the SMTP sender and will not deliver the message.
> Later on the sender t
Hi Alessio
What you describe doesn't explain the duplicate emails. Qmail-Scanner
doesn't like what spamd is returning and after trying three times will
do a "temp fail" to the SMTP sender and will not deliver the message.
Later on the sender tries again and probably fails again - end result
should
On 02/14/2010 04:35 PM, Archives wrote:
>
> According to the guy who developed reformime (who i talked to today),
> reformime inherits $LANG from it's parent process, it might be as simple
> as putting in a special case where $LANG is set before calling
> reformime... but I didn't have confidenc
On 2/13/2010 7:16 PM, Jason Haar wrote:
> On 02/14/2010 03:55 PM, Archives wrote:
>
>> Which is why reformime breaks. Setting it to:
>>
>> $ENV{'LC_ALL'}= $ENV{'LANG'} = $ENV{'LANGUAGE'} = 'en_US.UTF-8';
>> POSIX::setlocale(&POSIX::LC_ALL,'en_US.UTF-8');
>>
>> Results in a perfectly working, u
On 02/14/2010 03:55 PM, Archives wrote:
> Which is why reformime breaks. Setting it to:
>
> $ENV{'LC_ALL'}= $ENV{'LANG'} = $ENV{'LANGUAGE'} = 'en_US.UTF-8';
> POSIX::setlocale(&POSIX::LC_ALL,'en_US.UTF-8');
>
> Results in a perfectly working, unbroken system. (On my machine $LANG=
> 'en_US.UTF-8
At 13:58 + 12-01-2010, ifty shabir wrote:
Hi
Curently I have installed a mail server
utilising Clamav and Spamassasin using
qmailrocks
The server is working fine but I seem to have cropped against a problem
Every time I send out an email a SPAM Tag is
attached to just about ever
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I don't know why you want to do this, one very good thing of rbl is
> that it saves bandwidth because it rejects the message before the
> helo/ehlo command. But anyway, the answer is that you need to patch
> qmail-scanner-st, it shouldn't be difficult, have a
At 6:47 +0200 26-04-2009, Phibee Network Operation Center wrote:
>Hi
>
>i am search a small information:
>
> I use actually a front end qmail server without qmail-scanner
>but with rbldnsd direct reject. This server sent after the mail at
>a SpamAssassin/Qmail/Qmail6Scanner server for spam dete
Arno Slatius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been quite some time since the 2.06-rc2. Any thoughts on when it'll be
> released officially??
>
I've been very busy and SF changed their site design enough to force me
to have to figure out how to use it again. At my age that means I'm
flapping around for a
Hello,
It's been quite some time since the 2.06-rc2. Any thoughts on when it'll be
released officially??
Cheers
Arno
-Original Message-
From: Jason Haar [mailto:jason.h...@trimble.co.nz]
Sent: maandag 16 februari 2009 22:54
To: qmail-scanner-annou...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Qmai
e to share some of his statistics
on the (echo 'First M. Last'; cat SYSDEF) outputs on what scanners are
popular??
Cheers,
Arno Slatius
-Original Message-
From: Jason Haar [mailto:jason.h...@trimble.co.nz]
Sent: maandag 16 februari 2009 23:20
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.so
Well few facts.
Fpscan is not deamonized and its detection time is 20x-100x slower that
Clamav or Fpscand. It also double load of your server.
Fpscand is running in single thread and quite often get stuck. I belive,
that it can't handle huge traffic. (more that 10 emails per second)
Clama
Arno Slatius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, two enthusiastic thumbs up for including support for F-Prot 6.
> I installed the new scanner on a backup MX for now. I do have some issues
> which are fixable:
>
> The installer keeps 'detecting' the binary vars incorrect. I end up with
> this:
> my $
Hi,
First of all, two enthusiastic thumbs up for including support for F-Prot 6.
I installed the new scanner on a backup MX for now. I do have some issues
which are fixable:
The installer keeps 'detecting' the binary vars incorrect. I end up with
this:
my $fpscand_binary='/usr/local/sbin/fpsc
On Friday 19 September 2008, Jason Haar wrote:
> Futhwo wrote:
> > The new version of f-prot antivirus changed executables names and
> > scanning return codes, so by now using f-prot 6 with qmail-scanner is
> > not possible.
[...]
> I certainly don't have "free access" to every AV out there, so if
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:qmail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jason Haar
> Verzonden: vrijdag 19 september 2008 0:45
> Aan: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> Onderwerp: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] qmail-scanner and f-prot 6
>
> Futhwo wrote:
> > Hi
> > Th
Futhwo wrote:
> Hi
> The new version of f-prot antivirus changed executables names and
> scanning return codes, so by now using f-prot 6 with qmail-scanner is
> not possible.
>
> I'd like to know if this problem is gonna be addressed by developers.
>
Hi there
I certainly don't have "free ac
At 13:35 +0200 25-05-2008, Daniel Garcia Bruno wrote:
>After the minimal ./configure --sa-reject yes --sa-delete 5 --sa-
>quarantine 3 :
>
>The result commented ./configure in the script is:
>
># ./configure --qs-user qscand --admin root --domain dl380 --admin-
>description "System Anti-Virus A
Salvatore,
Thank's for your quick answer.
I assure you I've created the configure arguments reading the
definition one by one, around 10 times, but maybe I've been
lobotomized in my sleep.
I modified the script by hand because it did not work after creating
the script so many times ... so ap
At 0:41 +0200 25-05-2008, Daniel Garcia Bruno wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>I've been using QS for a while now. I'm trying
>to configure qmal-scannet-st to reject mail.
>
>I've tried many combinations but still QS always
>lets pass the SA tagged messages to maildirs
>As can see in the configure command
Any progress on this?
Best Regards,
John Gates
Dimante Computer Services LLC
http://www.dimante.net
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Op
Glenn Remstedt wrote:
> hi list,
> i have an QMS-2.02st installed together with clamav+SA. the log down here is
> showing
> something happening as far as i know, every morning at this very same time.
> could you do
> point me to on where i should look into for to have this sorted out - or is
>
What's odd is looking at qmail-scanner-queue.pl the command that I see is
basically:
clamdscan --version when I do this from the shell it returns:
ClamAV 0.92.1
So to me it seems really weird that it would not work as it always did.. But
then again I am not as versed with Perl, but I think t
It's a bug. ClamAV has changed the format they use for reporting versioning.
In fact clamscan/clamdscan no longer report the "pattern file" number at
all. I'm going to have to build a new version that uses freshclam to
figure out the version number instead. Pretty minor - should have it out
nex
Bookworm wrote:
> anageable number, at least to start.
>
> Then, you need to find out why your system isn't deleting the files
> _out_. My guess is that because the files are being created as RW only
> to qscand, the next process in line can't touch them.
>
Mattew, did you read the bit in
unning into those. For me, I'm not sure what
questions to ask. I'd almost have to get into your machine and root
around.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bookworm
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:3
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bookworm
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:30 PM
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Qmail-Scanner Working Directory
Overfloweth
Matthew Goodman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Cur
Matthew Goodman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently my /var/spool/qmailscan/working folder is not being cleared out.
>
> What exactly is in this folder, and why are there thousands and thousands
> of files in there? Is there any easy way to flush that out and recover the
> space?
>
> Every night my back
Roger Mutangadura wrote:
> Hello All.
>
> I am having a bit of a problem. I have installed qmail-scanner-2.02. I
> am having a problem in getting it to work with spamassassin and clamav.
>
> It sees the spamassassin fine but then it cannot see the clamav, because
> i installed it in
>
> /usr/local
Raul Glogovetan wrote:
>
> Hello Everybody
>
>
>
> I have a big problem I installed netqmail 1.05 it works like a charm…
> until I instaled and configured qmail-scanner + clamav + spamassassin
>
>
>
> The problem is at follows :
>
>
>
> ClamAV works, SpamAssassin works, but when I enable qmai
I have to disagere.
I have dual core amd64 with 3Gb of ram. I setup deadline for email, so
SA must report result in 100 seconds otherwise QS will just skip SA.
My limit at the moment is around 45 connections for smtp and 33
connections to the SA. Its best setup to have all emails scanned within
Hello,
i know that load over 1 is too much, but questions is why.
In normal messages are scanning from 2 - 5 seconds (qmail-scanner,
clamav, sa) when problem occurs it take about 30 - 120 seconds to scan
one message :(
SA, clamav are from distro (debian testing) other (vpopmail, netqmail,
qmail-
Lampa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm using toaster 0.8.3. Sometimes (one per week) i have problem that
> my server hangs for minute or two. I've limit 50 connections for smtpd
> (local 20 and remote 10), all 50 connections are used. Server load is
> about 50 - 100 and mostly is not responding.
50-100? Th
Lampa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> spamassassin and clamav are parts of scanning, eg should be:
> qmail-smtpd->qmail-scanner|qmail-queue(for some hosts)->deliver
>
> But there is no message from kernel not enough memory. But i'm
> checking each 10 minutes system resource (free) 9:10 is before 9:20 is
> afte
Changing your concurrency is going to depend on how you have installed qmail.
The basics are to edit your svscan run script and modify the -c parameter of
tcpserver to be the new concurrency level. If the install follows the
life-with-qmail installation then you should have several files in yo
Hello,
spamassassin and clamav are parts of scanning, eg should be:
qmail-smtpd->qmail-scanner|qmail-queue(for some hosts)->deliver
But there is no message from kernel not enough memory. But i'm
checking each 10 minutes system resource (free) 9:10 is before 9:20 is
after (proble was about 9:14 -
Hello,
using SATA discs with software raid 1 (mirror) with reiserfs system.
Spamassassin + scanned emails is on separate disc (system) and user
mailboxes are on separate disc. I think that reiserfs should be good
for that, but i want to migrate fo xfs.
Maybe there is option to change concurency b
>>
>> Lampa wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > i'm using toaster 0.8.3. Sometimes (one per week) i have problem that
>> > my server hangs for minute or two. I've limit 50 connections for smtpd
>> > (local 20 and remote 10), all 50 connections are used. Server load is
>> > about 50 - 100 and mostly is no
Lampa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'm using toaster 0.8.3. Sometimes (one per week) i have problem that
> my server hangs for minute or two. I've limit 50 connections for smtpd
> (local 20 and remote 10), all 50 connections are used. Server load is
> about 50 - 100 and mostly is not responding. I setup con
Salvatore,
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:17:13 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:09:18 +1000
> > Christian Lerrahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm rying to get validrcptto to work. I'm using the patch from
> > > http://www.lukasfeiler.com/rocketscience/qm
> Hi,
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:09:18 +1000
> Christian Lerrahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm rying to get validrcptto to work. I'm using the patch from
> > http://www.lukasfeiler.com/rocketscience/qmail/ but all the other
> > patches that are in this patch, I have already been using
Hi,
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:09:18 +1000
Christian Lerrahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm rying to get validrcptto to work. I'm using the patch from
> http://www.lukasfeiler.com/rocketscience/qmail/ but all the other
> patches that are in this patch, I have already been using before. Now
> a
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> Hi Arno
>
> You are right, that check is wrong, and it is also wrong in the
> original version I hope Jason should read this email.
>
>
Got it - thanks!
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 96
At 14:20 +0200 30-05-2007, Arno Slatius wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I found a small problem in the ST patched version (20070204) of the
>Qmail-scanner (it might also occur in the original version, havent looked
>it to it).
>
>I've had a few spam messages that already contained the X-Spam-Status line
>in the or
At 14:20 +0200 30-05-2007, Arno Slatius wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I found a small problem in the ST patched version (20070204) of the
>Qmail-scanner (it might also occur in the original version, havent looked
>it to it).
>
>I've had a few spam messages that already contained the X-Spam-Status line
>in the or
dimaki wrote:
>
> The problem is, that there are error codes (>8) that are actually only
> warnings. IMHO these warnings should not result in rejecting the whole
> mail.
>
> I would recommend to throw a warning instead of exiting in that case.
> I attach a patch for that.
I agree - your patch looks
At 12:39 -0500 6-02-2007, Steve Kamerman wrote:
>version:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] teratech]# cat
>/var/spool/qscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt
>clamdscan: 0.88.7/2527. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st.
>
>I have tried to enable the archive option for qmail-scanner in
>/etc/qmail-scanner.ini l
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:20:45 +0100
Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no problem on doing that for you, I don't really remember
> why I removed the '!' maybe because there are some checks about
> sa_subject and if it starts with a '!' some of the could be
> broken...
Do you
At 13:21 -0600 1-01-2007, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> if (/\;|\!/) {
>
>to this:
>
> if (/\;/) {
>
>Is there a valid reason for not allowing the "!" character in the
>file? It seems to work fine with this modification.
Hi
There is no problem on doing that for you, I don't really remember
why I
At 13:18 -0400 9-10-2006, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>I am getting lot of these in /var/log/qmai/smtpd/current file
>
>2006-10-09 12:58:13.655750500 X-QWESTIP-NET-QMAIL-SCANNER-1.25-st-qms:
>Process 16550 closed, parent process died
>
>Has anyone seen this? What would be a recommended way to troubleshoot
>
Facundo Barrera wrote:
> Global symbol "$nprocess" requires explicit package name at
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail- scanner-queue.pl line 657.
> BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl line 1238.
Qmail-Scanner has no mention of the string "$nprocess". Yo
That snip of log show a clean email. Output of clamav was OK. No virus
no bounce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fahmi (JN)
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 7:13 PM
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Qmail-scanner-gene
Hi Paul
you should install "daemontools" to solve it.
bye
David
Quoting Paul Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi All,
I am installing qmail-scanner on an existing server.
The machine is a Fedora Core 4 machine and has been running with
qmail for about 2 months.
./configure v1.25 works fi
Work perfectly, thanks
I was execute clamd as user (not root) and this user not have permissions to
/var/spool/qscan
I now a happy men :-)
Quoting Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Pardo Juan Fernando wrote:
Sorry, i wasnt execute clamd. The real log file is this.
Ok lets try it for real thi
Pardo Juan Fernando wrote:
Sorry, i wasnt execute clamd. The real log file is this.
Ok lets try it for real this time...
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:21:33 ART:3292: run /usr/local/bin/clamdscan --no-summary
/var/spool/qscan/tmp/servidor11441604935403292 2>&1
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:21:33 ART:3292: -
Pardo Juan Fernando wrote:
It's de full log file content. Sorry for the size of the "paste".
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:35 ART:3189: run /usr/local/bin/clamdscan
--no-summary /var/spool/qscan/tmp/servidor11441597755403189 2>&1
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:35 ART:3189: --output of clamdscan was:
con
Sorry, i wasnt execute clamd. The real log file is this.
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:21:33 ART:3292: +++ starting debugging for process 3292 by
uid=0
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:21:33 ART:3292: setting UID to EUID so subprocesses can
access files generated by this script
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:21:33 ART:3292: progr
It's de full log file content. Sorry for the size of the "paste".
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:35 ART:3189: +++ starting debugging for process 3189 by
uid=0
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:35 ART:3189: setting UID to EUID so subprocesses can
access files generated by this script
Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:35 ART:3
Pardo Juan Fernando wrote:
> I install qmail-scanner with "./configure --admin juanfer --domain
> juanfer.com.ar --install"
>
>
OK
> I exec "/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g" an unprivileged account
> and obtain:
> "perlscanner: generate new DB file from
> /var/spool/qscan/quarantine-ev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Haar skrev:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> All files are there, I checked, double checked and tripple checked...
>> The drive is fine, it's as new as a 9 GB SCSI drive can be.. ;)
>>
>> I tried running qmail-scanner as proposed after the installa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All files are there, I checked, double checked and tripple checked...
> The drive is fine, it's as new as a 9 GB SCSI drive can be.. ;)
>
> I tried running qmail-scanner as proposed after the installation ie:
> setuidgid qmaild /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g
>
>
> Markus Eskola wrote:
>> Can't load
>> '/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/sun4-solaris/auto/DB_File/DB_File.so' for
>> module DB_File: ld.so.1: qmail-scanner-queue.pl: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1:
>> ...
>>
>> All the so files are where they should and according to ldd it looks
>> like they should be ok.
> If a
Mattia Martinello wrote:
Has anyone ever get Qmail-Scanner running with Clam Antivirus and Dspam?
I have, but I run dspam from .qmail, not from qmail-scanner. And I don't
use the dspam cgi, each user has a spam folder where spam is delivered.
Cheers,
Ketil Froyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ket
Markus Eskola wrote:
> Can't load
> '/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.6/sun4-solaris/auto/DB_File/DB_File.so' for
> module DB_File: ld.so.1: qmail-scanner-queue.pl: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1:
> ...
>
> All the so files are where they should and according to ldd it looks
> like they should be ok.
If all the file
--- Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Regarding new features in v 2.0 - will there be an
> > option to block certain filetypes, regardless of
> the
> > extension? I'm thinking something like the "file"
> > command, but I suck at Perl and can't do it by
> > myself. Any chance of seeing this
Robert wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm very pleased to see that something is going on
> here - not that there is something wrong with the
> current QS version, though.
>
>
Good to hear!
> Regarding new features in v 2.0 - will there be an
> option to block certain filetypes, regardless of the
> extension
Hi
I'm very pleased to see that something is going on
here - not that there is something wrong with the
current QS version, though.
Regarding new features in v 2.0 - will there be an
option to block certain filetypes, regardless of the
extension? I'm thinking something like the "file"
command, b
Besides all new features and/or corrections about
q-s, I wonder about performance improvements in this version, so far.
BTW, I had searched in the q-s list (A LOT) about
keeping q-s persistent (in any possible way) but up to now I have no idea
if this is possible, how to do it and if it is worth.
"SA: required_hits ? / sa_quarantine +2.1 / sa_delete +4.2"
Why doesn't QS sense the SA required_hits?
This is strange.
Try this comand:
setuidgid qscand spamc -R -U /var/spool/spamd/spamd < /etc/hosts
Hejj, here is the problem.
:~# setuidgid qscand spamc -R -U /var/spool/spamd/spamd <
At 12:19 +0100 25-01-2006, Szabo Nandor wrote:
After debugging:
1.
# spamc -U /var/spool/spamd/spamd < /etc/hosts
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on server
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,MISSING_DATE,
MISSING_SUBJECT autole
After debugging:
1.
# spamc -U /var/spool/spamd/spamd < /etc/hosts
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on server
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,MISSING_DATE,
MISSING_SUBJECT autolearn=unavailable version=3.0.3
Seems good.
I suggest checking the following:
1) Check that spamd is running and working correctly from you qmail scanner
user (maybe it's a permission thing)
spamc -U /var/spool/spamd/spamd < /etc/hosts
(or some mail file, like sample-nonspam.txt which comes with SA)
2) Turn ON the debug for QS, Edit th
Hi everyone,
A few legit mails we received were blocked with the "message/partial.*
Message/partial MIME attachments blocked by policy" line in
quarantine-attachments.txt
I think I might also point out that the mails in question were all in
Japanese (which is a double-byte character set)
By
Jason Haar wrote:
Gary Lawton wrote:
The configure command I used to install qmail-scanner is as follows:
./configure --admin postmaster --domain mydomain.com --scanners
clamscan,verbose_spamassassin --notify all --add-dscr-hdrs yes
--ignore-eol-check --skip-setuid-test --local-domains "myd
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 11:16 +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> - even though you are strongly recommended NOT to do that? And you may
> very well find yourself put onto RBLs due to your mail server SPAMMING
> people with "a virus was blocked..." mail messages - when they weren't
> actually involved in
Gary Lawton wrote:
> The configure command I used to install qmail-scanner is as follows:
>
> ./configure --admin postmaster --domain mydomain.com --scanners
> clamscan,verbose_spamassassin --notify all --add-dscr-hdrs yes
> --ignore-eol-check --skip-setuid-test --local-domains "mydomain.com,
> myd
At 10:14 PM 11/29/2005, Noc Phibee wrote:
Hi
anyone know if they have a linux Version to Symantec for use it
with my qmail-scanner ?
or a other products based on the virus definition of symantec.
Because actually i use Clamav and Kaspersky but i have a lot of
virus that not detected
(dete
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:16:50 +0700 Arie Reynaldi Z <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any qmail-scanner statistic other then qss.sf.net which is
> not develop anymore ?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/qsstats/
Regards,
Nerijus
---
This SF
Matthew Kern wrote:
On Oct 14, 2005, at 10:58 AM, Jason Haar wrote:
Matthew Kern wrote:
MyTob-LI just slipped thru my clamav and f-prot scanners both
yesterday. (clamscan is at v 0.80).
Err, "0.80 is truly ancient"?
Seriously, Antivirus is a game of chase. In order to have any chanc
On Oct 14, 2005, at 10:58 AM, Jason Haar wrote:
Matthew Kern wrote:
MyTob-LI just slipped thru my clamav and f-prot scanners both
yesterday. (clamscan is at v 0.80).
Err, "0.80 is truly ancient"?
Seriously, Antivirus is a game of chase. In order to have any
chance of catching 99%
Matthew Kern wrote:
MyTob-LI just slipped thru my clamav and f-prot scanners both
yesterday. (clamscan is at v 0.80).
Err, "0.80 is truly ancient"?
Seriously, Antivirus is a game of chase. In order to have any chance of
catching 99% of new viruses, YOU MUST RUN THE CURRENT AV VERSIONS.
On Oct 14, 2005, at 10:14 AM, Samuel Murez wrote:
Hello--
I just noticed my qmail-scanner install with clamav (0.65) is
letting through Win32:Mytob-MC
MyTob-LI just slipped thru my clamav and f-prot scanners both
yesterday. (clamscan is at v 0.80).
Anybody know why this could be and
Samuel Murez wrote:
Hello--
I just noticed my qmail-scanner install with clamav (0.65) is letting
through Win32:Mytob-MC
Anybody know why this could be and what I could do to fix it ?
Yeah, how about update to the newest clamav? .65 is like 8 releases
behind current.
-Jim
--
clamav 0.65 is truly ancient. You most definitely need to update to a
newer version of clamav.
If you run clamscan from the command line you will probably see an error
informing you:
"""
Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately
Current functionality level = N, required
> Scott Lammers said:
> > I have already put the QMAILQUEUE line into the smtpd run file, at the
> > very top, and the mail sent through the sqwebmail interface does not get
> > scanned when sending to local, same domain, recipients. I may not have
> > been clear in my previous message. Any advis
1 - 100 of 596 matches
Mail list logo
