net-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v5] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v8] David Simms
• RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v3] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v5] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Artem
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v6] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v8] David Simms
• RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v6] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] jonghoonpark
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Integrated: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
• RFR: JDK-8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPerm… Mahendra Chhipa
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPerm… Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPerm… Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPermissionDenied.java‎ test [v2] Mahendra Chhipa
  • Re: RFR: 8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPermissionDenied.java test [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Integrated: 8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPermissionDenied.java test Mahendra Chhipa
• RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Daniel Fuchs
  • Integrated: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai

• Earlier messages
• Later messages