net-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
• RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
• RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v6] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] jonghoonpark
• RFR: JDK-8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPerm… Mahendra Chhipa
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPerm… Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPerm… Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPermissionDenied.java‎ test [v2] Mahendra Chhipa
  • Re: RFR: 8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPermissionDenied.java test [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Integrated: 8382118: Refactor open/test/jdk/sun/net/www/protocol/file/DirPermissionDenied.java test Mahendra Chhipa
• RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8382928: Add documentation to java.net.URI.normalize about empty segments Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Daniel Fuchs
  • Integrated: 8384486: NTLM tests fail on Windows 11 and Windows Server 2025 Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8310138: Socket.isInputShutdown and isOutputShutdown don't specify what is returned when socket is closed Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8249824: s/n/w/p/https/HttpsURLConnection/CloseKeepAliveCached.java uses @ignore w/o bugid [v9] Mikhail Yankelevich
• Re: RFR: 8249824: s/n/w/p/https/HttpsURLConnection/CloseKeepAliveCached.java uses @ignore w/o bugid [v8] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8249824: s/n/w/p/https/HttpsURLConnection/CloseKeepAliveCached.java uses @ignore w/o bugid [v8] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8249824: s/n/w/p/https/HttpsURLConnection/CloseKeepAliveCached.java uses @ignore w/o bugid [v8] Mikhail Yankelevich
• RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v2] Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v2] Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v2] Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v3] Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v3] Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v3] Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v4] Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v4] Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit [v4] duke
  • Integrated: 8381862: Refactor remaining TestNG tests under jdk/net/ExtendedSocketOption to use JUnit Daisuke Yamazaki
• RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG sstremler
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG sstremler
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v2] sstremler
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v2] sstremler
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v3] sstremler
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v3] Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v3] sstremler
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v4] sstremler
  • Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v4] Marcono1234
• RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v2] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v3] Robert Toyonaga
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8331996: JFR: Add boolean check before loading event classes [v3] Robert Toyonaga
• Re: RFR: 8249824: s/n/w/p/https/HttpsURLConnection/CloseKeepAliveCached.java uses @ignore w/o bugid [v7] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8249824: s/n/w/p/https/HttpsURLConnection/CloseKeepAliveCached.java uses @ignore w/o bugid [v7] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8249824: s/n/w/p/https/HttpsURLConnection/CloseKeepAliveCached.java uses @ignore w/o bugid [v7] Mikhail Yankelevich
• RFR: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8308878: com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/OutputFilterTest.java fails with assertion errors in IPv6 only environment Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8383248: Reduce buffer allocations for HTTP headers instead of allocating 16KB per request Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8383248: Reduce buffer allocations for HTTP headers instead of allocating 16KB per request [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8383248: Reduce buffer allocations for HTTP headers instead of allocating 16KB per request [v2] Ashay Rane

• Earlier messages