On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:34:12 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That's a good point. I'd rather not extend the test, especially since it's >> only running on Linux (it's failing on Mac, and I suppose it may fail on >> other platforms too). Would B8394580 be an acceptable name for this test, or >> are we no longer using this kind of names? > > come to think of it, should I even be adding a test for this behavior? I > mean, the test showcases the changes that have been done, but if Linux > maintainers decided to reject 127.x.x.255 addresses one day and this test > started failing, that wouldn't qualify as a JDK bug. > > Should I remove the tests and use the noreg-cleanup label instead? That's seems to be sensible thing to do as this is otherwise just testing Linux specific behavior. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33378#discussion_r4285283606
