github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] panic: nth_value window function negates i64::MIN [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Be able to cast struct to have non-nullable inner field [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(aqe): add `plan_id` to dynamic join [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor(aqe): add `plan_id` to dynamic join [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix nth_value window function negates i64::MIN [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix nth_value window function negates i64::MIN [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Port `TryCastExpr` to use `try_to_proto` / `try_from_proto` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor: Port TryCastExpr proto serialization hooks [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Reorder predicates in conjuncts via simple heuristic [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] minor(aqe): backport few datafusion physical rules identified as not idempotent [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(aqe): empty join handling [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): empty join handling [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] DataFusion evaluates -0.0 >= 0.0 as false [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DataFusion evaluates -0.0 >= 0.0 as false [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-plan): add GroupColumn support for FixedSizeList / List / LargeList / Struct in multi-column GROUP BY [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add DataFrame fill_nan [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: codegen dispatcher returns NULL for invalid try_make_timestamp inputs (#4554) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: codegen dispatcher returns NULL for invalid try_make_timestamp inputs (#4554) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] support size() for MapType inputs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Natively support regr_sxx, regr_syy, regr_sxy, regr_slope, regr_intercept, regr_r2 aggregates [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] TUI Improvements [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] TUI Improvements [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] TUI Improvements [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] TUI Improvements [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] TUI Improvements [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] TUI Improvements [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] TUI Improvements [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] TUI Improvements [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: replace default-allow cast unwrap with closed-by-default allowlist (timestamp + integer widening) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: replace default-allow cast unwrap with closed-by-default allowlist (timestamp + integer widening) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: replace default-allow cast unwrap with closed-by-default allowlist (timestamp + integer widening) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: unify ordering display with optimization path [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: unify ordering display with optimization path [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Skip zero-fill of hash buffer by writing null sentinels [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip zero-fill of hash buffer by writing null sentinels [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] sqllogictest fails with default feature set [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: Make sqllogictest pass with default features [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Make sqllogictest pass with default features [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: optimize date subtraction to avoid intermediate array allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize date subtraction to avoid intermediate array allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize date subtraction to avoid intermediate array allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] bug: Describe fails when schema has FixedBinarySize columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bug: Describe fails when schema has FixedBinarySize columns [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add `fill_null` on dataframe/expr level [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix log(0.0::float8) should error, not return -inf [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix log(0.0::float8) should error, not return -inf [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix log(0.0::float8) should error, not return -inf [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix log(0.0::float8) should error, not return -inf [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix log(0.0::float8) should error, not return -inf [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix log(0.0::float8) should error, not return -inf [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix log(0.0::float8) should error, not return -inf [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix log(0.0::float8) should error, not return -inf [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(shuffle): tolerate non-UTF-8 bytes in get_string (lossy decode) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(shuffle): tolerate non-UTF-8 bytes in get_string (lossy decode) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: decline CreateArray with struct-nullability-divergent children [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: decline CreateArray with struct-nullability-divergent children [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: decline CreateArray with struct-nullability-divergent children [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Improve consistency of per-column stats on `FilterExec` output [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve consistency of per-column stats on `FilterExec` output [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve consistency of per-column stats on `FilterExec` output [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve consistency of per-column stats on `FilterExec` output [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve consistency of per-column stats on `FilterExec` output [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve consistency of per-column stats on `FilterExec` output [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Correct computation of multi-key join selectivity [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Correct computation of selectivity for multi-key joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `estimate_inner_join_cardinality` is incorrect for multi-key joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `estimate_inner_join_cardinality` is incorrect for multi-key joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `estimate_inner_join_cardinality` is incorrect for multi-key joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Lower SLT HEADROOM_FACTOR 8.0 -> 5.0 to surface nested_loop_join_spill leak [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lower SLT HEADROOM_FACTOR 8.0 -> 5.0 to surface nested_loop_join_spill leak [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lower SLT HEADROOM_FACTOR 8.0 -> 5.0 to surface nested_loop_join_spill leak [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub

• Later messages