github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] fix: [branch-1.0] size JVM shuffle pointer array growth from the array, not the data pages (#5907) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: execute scalar Arrow Python UDFs in native Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Plan-time static partition pruning for Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Plan-time static partition pruning for Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Plan-time static partition pruning for Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Plan-time static partition pruning for Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Plan-time static partition pruning for Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: [branch-1.0] per-location credentials for the S3 credential SPI (#6031) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: [branch-1.0] per-location credentials for the S3 credential SPI (#6031) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: delegate the remaining codec methods in ComposedPhysicalExtensionCodec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: delegate the remaining codec methods in ComposedPhysicalExtensionCodec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: delegate the remaining codec methods in ComposedPhysicalExtensionCodec [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary aggregate spill rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix panic in `PercentileContGroupsAccumulator::convert_to_state()` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix panic in `PercentileContGroupsAccumulator::convert_to_state()` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix panic in `PercentileContGroupsAccumulator::convert_to_state()` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Reduce allocations in approx_percentile QuantileSummaries merge and flush paths [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Lambda function support from DataFusion, illustrated with array_filter [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Lambda function support from DataFusion, illustrated with array_filter [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Lambda function support from DataFusion, illustrated with array_filter [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Lambda function support from DataFusion, illustrated with array_filter [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Lambda function support from DataFusion, illustrated with array_filter [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid invalid date_bin ordering after overflow [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: deduplicate StringView/BinaryView buffer refs in CollectLeft Has... [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deduplicate StringView/BinaryView buffer refs in CollectLeft Has... [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deduplicate StringView/BinaryView buffer refs in CollectLeft Has... [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deduplicate StringView/BinaryView buffer refs in CollectLeft Has... [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deduplicate StringView/BinaryView buffer refs in CollectLeft Has... [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deduplicate StringView/BinaryView buffer refs in CollectLeft Has... [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: deduplicate StringView/BinaryView buffer refs in CollectLeft Has... [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: Optimize `array_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `array_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `array_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `array_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: close upstream coverage gaps for DataFusion 55.1.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [I] S3 credential SPI: per-location credentials within a bucket [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: track decimal overflow without rescanning results [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: track decimal overflow without rescanning results [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support multi-column NOT IN subqueries with null-aware joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Reduce retained buffer allocation when list_extract selects short nested arrays [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce retained buffer allocation when list_extract selects short nested arrays [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Expr.over() on an aggregate silently drops order_by, null_treatment, filter, and distinct [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: optimize list_extract without defaults using Arrow take [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize list_extract without defaults using Arrow take [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize list_extract without defaults using Arrow take [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adaptive coalescer repartition [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix panic from `avg(x ORDER BY y)` (and more) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support reusable prepared hash-join builds [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support reusable prepared hash-join builds [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support reusable prepared hash-join builds [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: wire native existence join support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: wire native existence join support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: wire native existence join support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: wire native existence join support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: wire native existence join support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: wire native existence join support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] DuckDB: Support CREATE TABLE SORTED BY [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: plan UNION of untyped aliased placeholders [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: plan UNION of untyped aliased placeholders [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: plan UNION of untyped aliased placeholders [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: interleave retained rows at emit instead of a take per group entry [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: interleave retained rows at emit instead of a take per group entry [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Gate fuzz oracle targets behind features [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gate fuzz oracle targets behind features [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] DuckDB: Support nested block comments [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DuckDB: Support nested block comments [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: stop gating columnar shuffle on native-serde checks it never uses [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop gating columnar shuffle on native-serde checks it never uses [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop gating columnar shuffle on native-serde checks it never uses [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop gating columnar shuffle on native-serde checks it never uses [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop gating columnar shuffle on native-serde checks it never uses [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop gating columnar shuffle on native-serde checks it never uses [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid quadratic planning for SELECTs with many aggregates [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: match Spark's duplicate field and field id semantics in parquet field lookup [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: match Spark's duplicate field and field id semantics in parquet field lookup [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: match Spark's duplicate field and field id semantics in parquet field lookup [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: match Spark's duplicate field and field id semantics in parquet field lookup [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: reject a file without field ids at any depth whether or not id matching is on [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject a file without field ids at any depth whether or not id matching is on [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject a file without field ids at any depth whether or not id matching is on [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] fair_unified: a JVM consumer freeing its last bytes can fail a parked native acquire with NoSuchElementException [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] fair_unified: a JVM consumer freeing its last bytes can fail a parked native acquire with NoSuchElementException [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Nightly CI failed on 2026-09-25 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Iceberg serde: residual reflection failures can silently drop residual filtering [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(iceberg): don't push transform residuals as their source column, fail on residual errors [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test: accept CometHashAggregateExec in the Spark 4.0 CollationSuite hash agg check [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [final state] optional filters stack (do not merge) [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages