On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 14:41, David Logan wrote:
> Thanks guys..
> Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread
> the mimedefang file - now seems to work !!
> Cheers.
> > Example:
> > header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
> > describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mention
Thanks guys..
Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread
the mimedefang file - now seems to work !!
Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 January 2004 14:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom
Are you sure you want that rule to be case sensitive, lower-case only?
try
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/i
(note the added i at the end)
At 11:48 AM 1/20/04 +, David Logan wrote:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
scor
Hi Cami,
Maybe not rulesets, but plenty of extra rules...
Read through the rest of Chris' site at
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
and
http://www.exit0.us
HTH,
matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of cami
Sent
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
> Just a minor correction,
>
> try this:
>
> header__BLOCKTOFFICEOUTTo =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> header__BLOCKFOFFICEOUTFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> metaBLOCK_MY_OFFICE(__BLOCKTOFFICEOUT && !__BLOCKFOFFICEOUT)
> describeBLOCK
Just a minor correction,
try this:
header__BLOCKTOFFICEOUTTo =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
header__BLOCKFOFFICEOUTFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
metaBLOCK_MY_OFFICE(__BLOCKTOFFICEOUT && !__BLOCKFOFFICEOUT)
describeBLOCK_MY_OFFICENo E-mail to alias from outside
scoreBLO
At 07:50 AM 10/21/2003, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
SA will by default parse *.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Thus, you can put
them in a separate CF file
Thomas Kinghorn Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 7:50 AM
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> file OR can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
They can be in any .cf file within the /etc/mail/spamassassin folder.
cheers,
Colin
Co
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Kinghorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules >> local.cf
>
>
> Hi List.
>
> Just a quick question.
>
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
> /e
Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Hi List.
Just a quick question.
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
Either will probably work, but it depends a bit on how you call
SpamAssassin. Generally
Yes.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Kinghorn
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules >> local.
Yes, any *.cf file in that directory will be parsed for rules / config
options.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> Just a quick question.
>
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/lo
Thanks Chris!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:59 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - HTML and Line Breaks
&g
You are correct. MK (I think) has a rule like this submitted to the Emporium
and it hits just like you described. I don't know of anyway around this.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
"A little nonsense
At 10:48 AM 10/8/03 -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
So, I have to use a reverse not a forward zone? Here is what I have
currently:
Well, it's a forward zone.. note that the records returned are A records,
not PTR.. However, the queries are built in a reverse-dns style, kind of
like how "in-addr.
via host identified via rbl.rbinc.com
tflags RVCD_LOC_RBL NET
score RVCD_LOC_RBL 6.00
Does this look correct?
Jenn
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:07 AM
To: Jennifer Fountain; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Custom
At 10:37 AM 10/7/03 -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
I am creating my own RBL (http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs) and
need guidance on creating the actual db. Does anyone have a sample rbl
db they can send me or direct me to a url?
RBLs are served as DNS zones and not as ordinary databases..
www.blackholes.us has ISC-BIND format zone files you can download.
FP
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:37, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
> I am creating my own RBL (http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs) and
> need guidance on creating the actual db. Does anyone have a sample rbl
> db they can send me or
Fred wrote:
>> See this page:
>> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
Frank Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sweet. Exactly what I needed. Thanks.
You can also read Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf (look for the string
"check_rbl") and read the examples in the 20_dnsbl_tests.cf file that
ship
Sweet. Exactly what I needed. Thanks.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
> See this page:
> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
>
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
See this page:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Frank Pineau wrote:
> Is there any way to make SA check other RBL's? Ever since the demise
> of Osirusoft, I've been using my own RBL zone file on my DNS server,
> but I'd like to
Hey Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> See why I don't need bayes or net tests ;) I catch 99% of
> spam. I've had a breakthru today that should catch the ones
> that have been sneaking in. (Matt and JMason, the doc I sent
> you guys has a pattern in the Message-ID he
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:24 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> > -Original Messag
Hi Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> Nope, sorry. Didn't catch that. THey are run from seperate cf
> files in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir. They are run for the
> entire company! Every bit of email that enters company is
> subject to all of these rules.
Matt's rul
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> > > -Ori
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM
> >
> > Do you have a feel for the number of rules that would need to be
> > in user_prefs to have a significant impact on perform
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:08 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
>
>
> >
Hi Tom,
You can find it here:
http://www.wot.no-ip.com/show.me/Projects/Blocklist/
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier
> A google of [reg2rule] and [reg2rule.pl] brings up nada.
> Throw me a bone?
---
This SF.net
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> I'm not sure about performance loss. I have every rule (That isn't a
> duplicate) in the SA rule emporeum running now. Plus all the
> evil domains generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I
> haven't put on the Emporeum yet. I say I h
Thanks Matt! Points well taken. As I only use SA on a gateway with very
limited access, I have not been too worried about the potential spamd
exploit. However, user_prefs is not my first choice. In fact, I would
rather use local.cf with spamd. I just don't like the idea of restarting
spamd eve
, 2003 8:12 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
[ ]
> evil domains
> generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I haven't put on the
[ ]
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM
> To: 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too igno
At 8/25/03 09:05 PM , Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yes, this is normal. I understand v.2.60 can be given a HUP signal, like
At 00:05 26/08/2003 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yep.
Regards,
Simon
Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too ignorant . . . Do you have a
feel for the number of rules that would need to be in user_prefs to have a
significant impact on performance relative to spamd with everything else
being equal? I am just looking for a rough guess. I could imagine that the
At 12:05 AM 8/26/03 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yes, local.cf and all of the /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf files are
Alex J. Avriette wrote:
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have the following rules:
[snip]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=4.0
tests=AMIKA_SPAM,HTML_70_80,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_SBL
version=2.55
Is there a problem with my rules, above? Or is it that sa isn't
reading rules from local.cf?
Is there a problem with my rules, above? Or is it that sa isn't reading rules from local.cf? I can't add this to my user_prefs because I'm using qmail with virtual domains so there aren't specific users I can use here.
There doesn't seem to be any problems with those rules.
Have you run spamassa
At 02:07 PM 8/17/03 -0400, Alex J. Avriette wrote:
Is there a problem with my rules, above? Or is it that sa isn't reading
rules from local.cf? I can't add this to my user_prefs because I'm using
qmail with virtual domains so there aren't specific users I can use here.
There doesn't seem to be a
t: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:20 PM
> > To: SA-Talk
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql -- body BUG?
> >
> >
> > hmmm. actually this is having a problem working for body also.
> >
> > I do however get "Checking priveleged com
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:20 PM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql -- body BUG?
>
>
> hmmm. actually this is having a problem working for body also.
>
>
|
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-----Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
T
ED] | score ADAM_TEST| 100 |
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc:
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> dallas,
>
> in order to make a rule like
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> dallas,
>
> in order to make a rule like
>
, 2003-07-28 at 14:41, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> > > To: Dallas L. Engelken
> > > Cc: SA-Talk
> > > Subject: RE:
nenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> > To: Dallas L. Engelken
> > Cc: SA-Talk
> > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
> >
> >
> > I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
> >
> > My que
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
>
>
I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
My question is if i can use the DB to create "rules" for users. Like
putting something like
header BAD_SUBJECT Subject =~ test
score BAD_SUBJECT 3.0
stuff like that in the DB
thanks
adam
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:21, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:44 AM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I am using SA 2.55 with mysql user prefs.
>
> Does anybody know if its possible to use per-dom
Chris Santerre wrote:
Did my list give you the rule writing sickness Bill? ;)
I'm in for a rule forum for sure! I just keep writing more rules every
week. But to make it separate will not work. The SA developers should
be part of the discussion, as they may have better insight as to what
the
Did my list
give you the rule writing sickness Bill? ;)
I'm in
for a rule forum for sure! I just keep writing more rules every week. But to
make it separate will not work. The SA developers should be part of the
discussion, as they may have better insight as to what the next SA ruleset wil
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nichols, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin-List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rules Forum? Listing?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:41:05PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> A Wiki is one of the easiest ways to set up space for
> collaborative contributions.
Great idea - a Wiki is not only one of the easiest, but one of the best
ways to set this up!
Regards: Jim Ford
--
Spam poison - don't use! --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello William,
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 12:01:59 PM, you wrote:
NW> Is there a forum, list or anything for custom rules that people have
NW> tested, are coming up with?
NW> If not would anyone be interested in one?
I've benefited from the rules peop
At 03:31 PM 6/2/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
Can one do body content filtering with custom SA rules? How about
custom subject filtering?
Yes.. I've got a guide on doing your own simple body and header rules.
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/SA-rules-howto-draft.txt
--
"Doug Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to create a custom rule and have it applied only for
> certain users? We are using a MySQL database for the preferences and
> would like to write a rule that filters out common pornographic terms
> and assigns them a VERY high score to s
Tom Allison wrote:
> Klaus Heinz wrote:
> >A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
> >rules specified in the users' configuration file. 'body' rules should
> >work, though. See also
> >
>
> This doesn't apply to Mail::SpamAssassin?
As the mistake happened in PerMs
Klaus Heinz wrote:
Patrick Bores wrote:
Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
Any ideas as to why this is happening?
A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
rules specified in the us
Patrick Bores wrote:
> Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
> Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
> Any ideas as to why this is happening?
A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
rules specified in the users' configuration fi
I should have mentioned. I've restarted spamd countless times, it
still does not work.
Patrick
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 11:15 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
Did you restart spamd?
service spamassassin restart
--or--
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
--or--
Whatever your flavor of *nix us
Did you restart spamd?
service spamassassin restart
--or--
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
--or--
Whatever your flavor of *nix uses to stop and restart the spamd
service.
-Michael
>>> Patrick Bores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/11/02 10:34AM >>>
Hello,
I have the following in my user_prefs file:
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:13 AM
To: David Brossard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rule STILL being ignored
Wait, are you trying to blacklist a subject or a received? The last time
you posted this rule it was a received header rule.
Your rule for MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD is
Wait, are you trying to blacklist a subject or a received? The last time
you posted this rule it was a received header rule.
Your rule for MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD is changing quite drastically. Do you
have multiple rules with this name?
Each of your own custom rules need to have their own distinct
: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:40 PM
To: David Brossard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rule STILL being ignored
The most debug output you can get from spamassassin is by running:
spamassassin -tD Is there a way to get more debug output from spamassassin (not spamd or
>sp
The most debug output you can get from spamassassin is by running:
spamassassin -tD
Note that sample-nonspam.txt is included in the SpamAssassin tarball.
I'd run the debug output version of SA above and look at where spamasin
is reading your user_prefs file and make sure that rule is in th
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 01:26:13PM -0800, Steve Thomas wrote:
> Do you have a 'describe' line in there? I don't know if SA requires it, but
describe isn't required. You only need the rule defined. The description
and score are autogenerated if none are specified.
BTW: I just double-checked and
|
| header MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD ALL=~/coolfunpages\.com/i
| score MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD 100
|
Do you have a 'describe' line in there? I don't know if SA requires it, but
I use a number of custom rules without any trouble and they all have a
description. Here's one example t
: [SAtalk] Custom Rule bein ignored
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:40:16AM -0800, Brossard, David wrote:
> > header MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD
Received=~/*coolfunpages.com/
I think the problem is that the RE should be .* not * (it's regular
expression, not file globbing ... :) )
$ perl -e
Re-read the suggested rule I gave you, it does NOT contain a *. In fact,
it's a regex syntax error to have the * where you put it.
When adding custom rules I strongly recommed that you run spamassassin
--lint so you can see it complain about syntactic errors like your version
had. Under normal
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:55:26AM -0800, Brossard, David wrote:
> Ah. Well then it begs the question, how do I get it to filter
> smtp69.coolfunpages.com and smtpX.coolfunpages.com?
As I stated, use ".*" instead of "*". I would personally use something
like /smtp.{1,5}\.coolfunpages\.com/i
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:40:16AM -0800, Brossard, David wrote:
> > header MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD Received=~/*coolfunpages.com/
I think the problem is that the RE should be .* not * (it's regular
expression, not file globbing ... :) )
$ perl -e 'print yes if /*foo/'
Quantifier follows
Thanks for the response. I actually tried that originally and
thought it was being ignored for the spaces.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mason [mailto:jm@;jmason.org]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Brossard, David
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk
Brossard, David said:
> I asked earlier about a way to block messages if they are
> received from a certain set of servers. Someone very kindly provided me
> with a custom rule to filter them out via header info. Unfortunately no
> matter what I try the new custom rule is being ignored. I h
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:14:16PM +0200, Denis wrote:
> I am aware of the user_prefs file, but I have not found good syntax
> descriptions (what man page to check ??).
You could also use /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf for a global setting.
You want to look at the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man
On Thursday 20 June 2002 10:41 am, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:31:34AM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote:
> > I've added a couple of custom rules to our local.cf for industry-specific
> > terms. So far I've set up one rule for the subject and one for the body
> > for each 'keyword
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:31:34AM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote:
> I apologize if this has been covered previously - I couldn't find any way to
> search the archives at Geocrawler.
>
> I've added a couple of custom rules to our local.cf for industry-specific
> terms. So far I've set up one rule for
thanks;
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:47:44 -0500
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:35:50PM -0500, Landy Roman wrote:
> | nice article in LM about spamassassin, i hope the spammers don't
> | read it
>
> Doesn't make much difference. The only thing they can do is turn
> the
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:35:50PM -0500, Landy Roman wrote:
| nice article in LM about spamassassin, i hope the spammers don't
| read it
Doesn't make much difference. The only thing they can do is turn
their spam into not-spam, but then they wouldn't be spammers any more
:-).
| i am kind of c
79 matches
Mail list logo
