On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM > > > > Do you have a feel for the number of rules that would need to be > > in user_prefs to have a significant impact on performance ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I'm not sure about performance loss. I have every rule (That isn't a > duplicate) in the SA rule emporeum running now.
You're running all the rules from the SA rule emporeum out of your own ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file? Really? > On a side note, I'm still using 2.4x and about 70% of my points come > from custom rules. Using the rules gathered from the emporeum + the ones > generated from reg2rule.pl have boosted my average spam score from 9 to > about 25!!! Custom rules rock! Not that I have anything against custom rules -- I use a number of them myself -- but the point of the custom rules should be to cause the score to cross the threshold in the desired direction (over for spam, under for ham). What's the point in running up the score of messages that are already being correctly tagged? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
