Hey Chris,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Santerre > See why I don't need bayes or net tests ;) I catch 99% of > spam. I've had a breakthru today that should catch the ones > that have been sneaking in. (Matt and JMason, the doc I sent > you guys has a pattern in the Message-ID header + > BASE64_ENC_TEXT + MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET that I noticed today. > I plan to meta that with some RAW rules to catch those sneaky > SOBs!) I have to deal with email from china and korea, so > net tests aren't that good for me. I also don't like to rely > on someone elses system. Throw me a bone! I have been waiting for more of what your idea is about. What are your thoughts? --Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
