> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Santerre
> I'm not sure about performance loss. I have every rule (That isn't a > duplicate) in the SA rule emporeum running now. Plus all the > evil domains generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I > haven't put on the Emporeum yet. I say I have to be running 300+, > closer to 400 rules for the entire company. But we conly get around > 3500-4500 emails a week. NO network tests, no bayes. Why not use network tests or Bayes? By network tests do you mean SMTP or SA (blackhole) tests or both? Out of curiousity (if you care to share this), what is the average msg count per mailbox and your average percentage of spam to total? I am seeing about 200-250 messages/mailbox/week and around 35%-40% spam to total. > I'll try to get a rule count and average time to check later today. That would be much appreciated! With that many rules I would love to see your numbers. > On a side note, I'm still using 2.4x and about 70% of my > points come from custom rules. Using the rules gathered from the > emporeum + the ones generated from reg2rule.pl have boosted my > average spam score from 9 to about 25!!! Custom rules rock! That helps me understand better why there has been such a flurry of messages about custom rules. Looks like I need to get off my duff in this area. Why are you still using 2.4x? Thanks, Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
