[SAtalk] (no subject)

Hi group, Got SA working, and I want to test it out on only a few users. I have SA set up to run when called from Amavisd, which is called by postfix, which is set up as a relay. Currently it is set up to put a ***SPAM*** tag on every email that is suspicios to every email that passes through it.

[SAtalk] (no subject)

Here is another one for BigEvil that I am getting a lot of: www.allsafetyproducts.biz Andrew Hoying --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced b

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

--On Monday, January 05, 2004 8:55 AM -0500 Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps a good first step would be to not use an open relay for your mail And second to put a subject line on your messages. :) --- This SF.net email is sponsored b

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

> Can Anybody tell me how to configure spamassassin on redhat > 8.0/ sendmail > > With Regards, > Sarvesh Singhal > > Abhikalak Consultants > (Systems and Security Division) > B-326, Sarita Vihar, > New Delhi - 110 044 > Ph: +91 11 2695 2234-35 > web:www.abhikalak.com Perhaps a good first step

[SAtalk] (no subject)

Can Anybody tell me how to configure spamassassin on redhat 8.0/ sendmail With Regards, Sarvesh Singhal Abhikalak Consultants (Systems and Security Division) B-326, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi - 110 044 Ph: +91 11 2695 2234-35 web:www.abhikalak.com Pl

[SAtalk] (no subject)

I am the system administrator for my company. We are in the process of creating an autoresponder and are willing to download the SpamAssassin for the spam filter for the email sent through the autoresponder. My concern here is, I do not have Perl installed on my server and am not willing to do

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David B Funk wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > We've got SA 2.60 running on a Solaris 8 box with SunONE Messaging > > Server. It is doing spam scanning for all our users (~7000). In > > order to keep the system as speedy as possible, I've configured t

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We've got SA 2.60 running on a Solaris 8 box with SunONE Messaging > Server. It is doing spam scanning for all our users (~7000). In > order to keep the system as speedy as possible, I've configured the > bayes journal to sit on /tmp which is a memor

Re: bayes database backup [was: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)]

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:58:47PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So rather than backing up all three files, I just need to back up the > bayes_toks file periodicly. And I could use a file lock for this > purpose, as you confirmed below. Arguably you should backup seen as well, it has the mess

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:11:06PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'd like to back up the journal periodicly to disk. Right now I have > > There's really no point to that. Just sync the journal to the DB. > > > searc

bayes database backup [was: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)]

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:11:06PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'd like to back up the journal periodicly to disk. Right now I have > > There's really no point to that. Just sync the journal to the DB. Ok, then I guess I have a faulty underst

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:11:06PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to back up the journal periodicly to disk. Right now I have There's really no point to that. Just sync the journal to the DB. > searching through the archives and docs, I've not found anything > regarding this issue.

[SAtalk] (no subject)

We've got SA 2.60 running on a Solaris 8 box with SunONE Messaging Server. It is doing spam scanning for all our users (~7000). In order to keep the system as speedy as possible, I've configured the bayes journal to sit on /tmp which is a memory file system. I'd like to back up the journal perio

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

>>I just got this virus message that appears to have come from sourceforge. >>Did anyone else get this or did my antivirus FP on me? >FP.. that exact message passed through my copy of clamscan just fine.. >clamav is updated hourly here. We had it hit as a virus also... James -

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

At 04:41 PM 12/3/2003, Bill wrote: I just got this virus message that appears to have come from sourceforge. Did anyone else get this or did my antivirus FP on me? FP.. that exact message passed through my copy of clamscan just fine.. clamav is updated hourly here. -

[SAtalk] (no subject)

I just got this virus message that appears to have come from sourceforge. Did anyone else get this or did my antivirus FP on me? ---snip- The virus checker has found potentially malicious code in a mail by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery has been stopped. The recipient(s) for

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, mairhtin o'feannag wrote: > I have one client who wants to receive any emails they get, irrespective > of SPAM (they suspect that there are legitimate emails being eliminated as > spam). What they want is that anything that is addressed to them > (yadayada.com) be sent throug

[SAtalk] (no subject)

Terry Milnes said: > Frederick M Avolio wrote: >> At 06:13 AM 11/25/2003 +0100, Mark wrote: >> >>> Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program based on >>> Perl. Perl >>> is the underlying engine, which, in and by itself, has nothing to >>> do with >>> SA. It is good to keep that in

[SAtalk] (no subject)

Hello, I have one client who wants to receive any emails they get, irrespective of SPAM (they suspect that there are legitimate emails being eliminated as spam). What they want is that anything that is addressed to them (yadayada.com) be sent through the spam checker and marked as spam, but s

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

the autolearn header is only set to "yes" when a message is found outside of the boundaries, which is (below) 0.1 for ham/non-spam and (above) 12.0 for spam. It uses scoresets with bayes disabled when comparing an email's score against the thresholds (unless of course you've modified the bayes_*

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Good evening, Mairhtin, On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Mairhtin O'Feannag wrote: > Below are the first few lines of my local.cf file for the entire site. > I do not have a local.cf for any of my users. > > However, when I get mail, it says : autolearn=no version=2.60 > > Why does it think that autolea

[SAtalk] (no subject)

Hello, Below are the first few lines of my local.cf file for the entire site. I do not have a local.cf for any of my users. However, when I get mail, it says : autolearn=no version=2.60 Why does it think that autolearn is off, when I clearly set it on? Thanks Mairhtin # SpamAssassin confi

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

At 03:25 PM 11/19/2003, Robert Oslin wrote: My first post to this list. Hope I'm doing this right... I received a message with invisible fonts, yet the generic HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE rule wasn't hit. Was it because the body tag didn't specify a background font, therefore the text font color had nothi

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

just as 'white'. > > -id You will need to note that the rawbody line needs to be one line without any line breaks. So the test portion would look like: //i --Larry > -Original Message- > From: Robert Oslin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 19,

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

OTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] (no subject) > > > The IP in the header: > > Received: from jp (w068.z064000153.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net > [64.0.153.68]) by > bloomail.mybloo.com > (Vircom SMTPRS 5.3.232) with SMTP id > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

never leave! :D --Chris > -Original Message- > From: Michael H. Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject) > > > No, You leave... > > Is this spam o

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

3 12:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject) No, You leave... Is this spam of some new form? Reo wrote: > leave -- Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy It's us against them. Ride like you stole it! http://linuxlink.com -

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

No, You leave... Is this spam of some new form? Reo wrote: leave -- Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy It's us against them. Ride like you stole it! http://linuxlink.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Progr

[SAtalk] (no subject)

leave

[SAtalk] "no subject" not being prepended?

First off...Spamassassin rules.  One little issue though...   Has anyone run into an problem where spamassassin is catching the spam and trying to prepend the *SPAM* but it fails when there is no subject line?  We are using SA2.60/sendmail 8.12.10/spamass-milter on redhat 9 as a g

[SAtalk] (no subject)

Hi all, **Exuse me for this newbie quetsion , but I did not find anywhere the answer to my question** 1-Could anyone explain me why, in Razor installation , when running razor-admin create it is useful to change user name from root. What does it imply if user is still root? 2-Which percentage

[SAtalk] (no subject)

Don't forget to vote with your wallet. * Move your domains from Network Solutions to any other registrar. * Don't renew your SSL certs and find another CA (if possible). Don't use Thawte - Verisign owns them. * Sell your VRSN stock and get out of any funds that invest

[SAtalk] (no subject)

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Nougen Canada Inc. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_QM90VpaqliA7JXtz7mI5dw)" X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thun

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:04:00PM +0300, Jchen22 wrote: > does anyone know spam sender "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? There's little point in looking at the From: header to figure out who's sending the spam. Most of the addresses are almost as random as the addresses in the To: (well, or envelope recipien

[SAtalk] (no subject)

 

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

--On Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:11 PM -0700 Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:04 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: does anyone know spam sender "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Yeah, my buddy Jim! What's he doing sending out spam?? Care to expand some more on this

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

--On Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:04 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > does anyone know spam sender "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Yeah, my buddy Jim! What's he doing sending out spam?? Care to expand some more on this? Anonymizer is a well known software app that allows you to browse without other si

[SAtalk] (no subject)

does anyone know spam sender "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com. Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From careers in IT to Engineering to Tech Sales, Dice has tech jobs from the best

Re: [SAtalk] No subject?

On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 03:30, Jim Knuth wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jim Knuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "SA List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 4

Re: [SAtalk] No subject?

- Original Message - From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jim Knuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "SA List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 4:06 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] No subject? > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME

Re: [SAtalk] No subject?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jim, Friday, August 1, 2003, 3:52:09 PM, you wrote: JK> Hi, JK> how can I make a rule against: JK> "No subject" What do you mean by "No subject"? Do you mean exactly that text in the subject header? Do you mean an email that has no subject h

[SAtalk] No subject?

Hi, how can I make a rule against: "No subject" thanx for help Jim --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject) - Installation

At 12:05 PM 7/31/03 +0530, jagan wrote: sir, i ahve downloaded ur spamassasin . i need to insatll to my server which runs on linux. I like to have the method of 1.INSTALLATION AND 2.INTEGRATING THIS WITH MY MTA QMAIL USING spamd . That is via C AND NOT PERL. so how could i go about installing.

[SAtalk] (no subject)

sir, i ahve downloaded ur spamassasin . i need to insatll to my server which runs on linux. I like to have the method of 1.INSTALLATION AND 2.INTEGRATING THIS WITH MY MTA QMAIL USING spamd . That is via C AND NOT PERL. so how could i go about installing. ur INSTALL does not provide detais on

[SAtalk] (no subject)

--- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.c

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

At 01:47 PM 7/17/2003 -0600, Eric wrote: when I try to install digest-sha1 I am getting errors. What is the best way to install digest::sha1 from cpan it hangs on ftp If CPAN's ftp is hanging, you probably need passive mode to get through a firewall.. one site with a bit of reference on how to d

[SAtalk] (no subject)

when I try to install digest-sha1 I am getting errors. What is the best way to install digest::sha1 from cpan it hangs on ftp from source it wont pass the tests 1/16 failed Eric --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMwar

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Per the sendmail doc it's [EMAIL PROTECTED], although for kicks I tried what you suggested and got the error: 51 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 1257: Xspamassassin: unknown socket type localhost: Protocol not supported --- Patrick Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "S=unix:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

"S=unix:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" doesn't really make much sense for a socket name. You probably want "S=localhost:12000" Gerald Raynor wrote: I seem to have everything configured properly but I think I'm missing a small step somewhere in starting/running spamassassin. The process seems to be running b

[SAtalk] (no subject)

I seem to have everything configured properly but I think I'm missing a small step somewhere in starting/running spamassassin. The process seems to be running but sendmail either doesn't like it or doesn't see it. However, when I run the sample.pl against sendmail.cf it test fine. Below are the st

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no subject))

It would help if the spam report that's generated clearly identified the host that added it. If that header included something like: Scanned for spam by host mail.small-web-host.com (172.17.2.3) I also *LOVE* that idea, but for another reason. I like to know which machines in the farm scanned

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no subject))

At Wed Jun 4 21:10:01 2003, Justin Mason wrote: > - They go to the URL in the mail -- http://SpamAssassin.org/tag/ -- > this page tells them to ask their ISP. So they do, and the ISP > says "we don't run that" -- because the *web host*, not the ISP, > is running it, and they don't

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no subject))

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:51:43AM -0700, Alan Leghart wrote: > YMMV. Hopefully your changes will relieve some of the "I'm the president" > posts. As we seem to have established the OP as a spammer/troll, should we report them to Razor et al as well as our Bayes DB's? Regards: Jim Ford -

Re: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no subject))

Alan Leghart said: > --On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 1:10 PM -0700 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Listen folks -- you are all too conspiracy-minded here. > > > > > The last few people who've mailed here, have fit this profile. I know, > > because I've followed up on it. > > > >

RE: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no subject))

the way to mexico! :) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:10 PM > To: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)' > Subject: Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no > subject)) > > &g

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On 6/4/03 2:07 PM, "Matt Beland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (B (B[...] (B> (B> Does anyone else think this is an odd series of coincidences? Or have I (B> watched too many conspiracy movies lately? (B (Bi've always been suspicious of these emails... which is why i don't reply (B(flame or o

Enough with the conspiracy theories! (was Re: [SAtalk] (no subject))

Peter P. Benac said: > Ya'll need to realize that this crap is coming from the very people Spam > Assassin was designed to block - THE SPAMMER. > Think people Spam Assassin doesn't just appear on a PC. It needs to be > installed. Perl needs to be installed, a Mail Transfer Agent needs to be > In

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Troll is too good a word for these people, we need some new jargon to refer to a trolling spammer, suggestions? "lawyer?" ;) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

- Original Message - From: "Matt Beland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:07 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject) > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote: > > Didn't this (and all the s

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

o: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:17 PM Subject: [SAtalk] (no subject) I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe to you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you. I found you on my computer, deleted you, and 3 days later you are back again. I

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Interestingly enough, as a test I sent an e-mail to "Marge Golomb" with a read receipt request. I got the receipt, and it appears whoever "marge" is is using OE6. TC --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

tp://www.nmsusers.org To have principles... First have courage.. With principles comes integrity!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Cameron Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:42 To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject:

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 09:52, Chris Santerre wrote: > I plan on never replying to these kinds of posts again. It is a scam to > waste our time. Hell, I may start writing a rule to put them in the spamtrap > ;) > Ah, Grasshopper. You have acheved true enlightenment. -- AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

- Original Message - On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote: >Or have I watched too many conspiracy movies lately? No, I think you're right on track - I was just talking to Elvis about this kind of thing the other day on the Mother Ship. -- Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

- Original Message - From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:49 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] (no subject) > UNtil you figure out how to send it to the correct a

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

pamtrap ;) -Original Message- From: Marge Golomb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] (no subject) I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe to you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you.

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

4, 2003 3:19 AM > To: Jack Gostl; Matt Beland > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject) > > > how many times should i say unsubscribe me from this list > > - Original Message - > From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:18 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject) > how many times should i say unsubscribe me from this list > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the pla

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

how many times should i say unsubscribe me from this list - Original Message - From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matt Beland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:47 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subjec

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

iots... :P PS: Standard, not-trolling/not-flaming disclamer here. -r - Original Message - From: "Matt Beland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:07 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] (no subject) > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Matt Beland wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote: > > Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several > > times already in the recent past?? > > > > Anyone ever see Groundhog Day? I'm startin to get wigged out... > > Yeah, but t

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Tuesday 03 June 2003 08:40 pm, Ryan Bingham wrote: > Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several > times already in the recent past?? > > Anyone ever see Groundhog Day? I'm startin to get wigged out... Yeah, but these guys aren't as funny as Bill Murray. One other t

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

PM Subject: [SAtalk] (no subject) I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe to you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you. I found you on my computer, deleted you, and 3 days later you are back again. I want you off my computer - if I want my email checked, I

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Hi, Let's break this up into smaller pieces... On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:17:21 -0500 "Marge Golomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe > to you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you. To be fair, we know nothing about you or

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Tuesday 03 June 2003 18:17, Marge Golomb wrote: > I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe to > you. I emailed them and they know nothing about you. I found you on my > computer, deleted you, and 3 days later you are back again. I want you off > my computer - if

[SAtalk] (no subject)

I do not want spamassassin - I called my ISP and they do not subscribe to you.  I emailed them and they know nothing about you.  I found you on my computer, deleted you, and 3 days later you are back again.  I want you off my computer - if I want my email checked, I will check it myself!  Le

[SAtalk] (no subject)

 

[SAtalk] (no subject)

  The art of being wise is the art of knowing what to overlook   Windows: Where do you want to go today?MacOS: Where do you want to be tomorrow?Linux: Are you coming or what?        

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

> >> As far as I know this is an open list that allows non-subscribers to > >> post > >> to it. BIG MISTAKE for a list of this nature IMHO. If the list were made > >> "subscriber posting only" then a number of things would happen: > > > > If you think this is a hassle, have some sympathy for the l

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

> >> As far as I know this is an open list that allows non-subscribers to >> post >> to it. BIG MISTAKE for a list of this nature IMHO. If the list were made >> "subscriber posting only" then a number of things would happen: > > If you think this is a hassle, have some sympathy for the list manager

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

> As far as I know this is an open list that allows non-subscribers to post > to it. BIG MISTAKE for a list of this nature IMHO. If the list were made > "subscriber posting only" then a number of things would happen: If you think this is a hassle, have some sympathy for the list manager who has t

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Or, if people exclude this list when replying to anyone who for whatever reason send a complaint about spamassassin disrupting service or whatever... I don't see any reason for anyone to include the list in a reply?... / Per -Original Message- From: Simon Byrnand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

-3200 Main http://www.camerontech.com - Original Message - From: "Simon Byrnand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Keoki Kalune" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 31

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

> Hi Keoki - > > You should probably talk to your system administrator or your ISP, > whomever > handles your e-mail service. The mailing list you sent your message to is > for people who use and develop SpamAssassin. There is little chance that > anyone on this list has anything to do with your

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 30 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: Has anyone gotten a reply from these kinds of posts after you answer them. I think the score is like 1-6. 1 reply after we all answered, and we've had about 6 of these kinds of posts. Didn't anyone call the person? I am s t

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > Has anyone gotten a reply from these kinds of posts after you answer them. I > think the score is like 1-6. 1 reply after we all answered, and we've had > about 6 of these kinds of posts. > > Didn't anyone call the person? I am s tempted :) Make

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

ht people to solve the problem without some more information about what's not working. > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Keoki Kalune > > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:00 AM > > To: [EMA

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

At 08:59 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote: Content analysis details: (5.80 points, 5 required) MSGID_CHARS_SPAM (0.2 points) Message-Id has characters indicating spam HTML_FONT_FACE_ODD (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font face is not a commonly used face HTML_80_90 (0.5 points) BODY: Message is 80

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

K. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:11 PM > To: 'Keoki Kalune'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] (no subject) > > > Ok you need to contact your ISP you twit! They are the ones that use > spamassassin to filter your email... S

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Well he does want someone to contact him ASAP, should we all just send e-mail to him? On side note, sure gets agitated poor lil' fellow. -Original Message- From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 30 May 2003, K

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Keoki Kalune wrote: > TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS > DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP *sigh* > Executive Vice President Typical management. The tie is just a little too tight. J

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Keoki Kalune wrote: > TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS > DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP > > Keoki Kalune > Executive Vice President Nice. Executive VP and (s)he can't even form a coherent sentence. I won't

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Keoki Kalune wrote: *TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP* www.rkgllc.com Uh oh... sonic.net sounds familiar. ;) [10:[EMAIL PROTECTED] host -t mx rkgllc.com rkgllc.com. mail is ha

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

: [SAtalk] (no subject) TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP Keoki Kalune Executive Vice President The RK Group 408-942-8107 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rkgllc.com

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

service. Regards, Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT Cameron Technical Services, Inc. (512) 454-3200 Main http://www.camerontech.com - Original Message - From: "Keoki Kalune" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:59 AM Subject

[SAtalk] (no subject)

TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS.  I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP   Keoki Kalune Executive Vice President The RK Group 408-942-8107 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rkgllc.com    

[SAtalk] (no subject)

Steven Fletcher Tel 0870 129 3488 Systems Support TechnicianFax 0870 129 7488 dabs.com plc mobile 07812 584132 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>

Re: Fw: [SAtalk] (no subject)

ons, 2003-03-12 kl. 11:00 skrev Tony L. Svanstrom: > Seriously, it's really time to: > > 1) Remove the URL to www.spamassassin.org. Absolutely. My own opinion is that if, as seems to be the case with this Japanese gentleman, his ISP or own organization has implemented SA, then that organizatio

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Вторник, 11 Март 2003 12:40, Mieko Miyazaki wrote: > Do not Send!! I hate What don't you want to recieve ? :-) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf __

[SAtalk] (no subject)

(B (B (BDo not Send!! I (Bhate

  1   2   >