At Wed Jun  4 21:10:01 2003, Justin Mason wrote:

>   - They go to the URL in the mail -- http://SpamAssassin.org/tag/ --
>     this page tells them to ask their ISP.  So they do, and the ISP
>     says "we don't run that" -- because the *web host*, not the ISP,
>     is running it, and they don't know anything about the web host
>     because their website was set up by some local guy, who took
>     care of that detail (they just get a yearly bill from internic
>     or whatever).

It would help if the spam report that's generated clearly identified
the host that added it.  If that header included something like:

 Scanned for spam by host mail.small-web-host.com (172.17.2.3)

then it might give the user more of a clue as to who they need to talk
to. 

Obviously this isn't a cure-all, not least because it relies on the
system running SA to have a meaningful name and be configured
correctly.  But I think it would help.

(In addition, it would be nice if the added *headers* also included
one indicating what host had done the scanning.)

Martin
-- 
Martin Radford              |   "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff  -o)
Registered Linux user #9257 |  on ftp and let the rest of the world  /\\
- see http://counter.li.org |       mirror it ;)"  - Linus Torvalds _\_V


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to