ons, 2003-03-12 kl. 11:00 skrev Tony L. Svanstrom: > Seriously, it's really time to: > > 1) Remove the URL to www.spamassassin.org.
Absolutely. My own opinion is that if, as seems to be the case with this Japanese gentleman, his ISP or own organization has implemented SA, then that organization has taken over responsibility and is acting as a legal proxy for spamassassin.org. All references should be to that organization. > 2) Add information regarding what server added the report. Reference to the implementing org. should be sufficient. > 3) Make it a lot clearer that the admins has to inform their > users before starting to use SA. Absolutely. Many commercial instances set a basic knowledge standard for use of their products. SA is *not* easy to use correctly and demands basic knowledge of the product itself and auxiliaries such as Perl. Costs time, trouble and commitment. Maybe a list of stuff that sysadmins should gen up on would be useful. Most other (Open Source as well as commercial) software I use has spec documents and FAQs and people who ask questions are generally referred to these before any questions are answered with good grace. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw 247,035 lemmings can't be wrong ... Ask the man from Framfjord e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.billy.demon.nl ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
