at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
> > I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
> > doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
>
> We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug
for t
I found in the rules that spamassassin ships a rule for checking against
bl.spamcop.net. In the score file, it gives this a zero weight, encouraging
you to give it some score if you donate.
Since I am a spamcop customer and feel justified in using them, I copied
the line:
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMC
At 4:01pm -0600 1/5/04, David B Funk wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Ed Kasky wrote:
>
Any other way to monitor the file's effectiveness?
Ed
Create a simple test mail message that contains a URL fabricated using
any one of the hosts listed in BigEvil.cf. Feed the test message to
"spamc
Found a few...
3.0 BigEvilList_192URI: Generated BigEvilList_192
Thanks!
Ed
. . . . . . . .
"We made too many wrong mistakes."
-- Yogi Berra, 1960
At 10:46 AM Monday, 1/5/2004, Gary Smith wrote -=>
Wait for a while to get some spams. Then check the log file. Als
assassin" for site rules dir
Any other way to monitor the file's effectiveness?
Ed
. . . . . . . .
There is so much good in the worst of us and so much bad
in the best of us that it ill behooves us to find fault
with the rest of us. -Mom
Start spamd with -D debug options and then tail
sane holiday!
Ed Kasky
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Two wrongs do not make a right - it usually takes three or more.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or
Jack Coates wrote:
just got a spam that SA 2.55 not only didn't catch, but specifically let
through because of whitelisting. I don't have a manual whitelist that
matches this message, but I do have auto-whitelist turned on.
Is there a way to parse the auto whitelist files and see what's in them?
I'
Maxwell Ochieng wrote:
I would like help on how i can delete or quarantine mails tagged as spam
by SA am running qmail+qmail-scanner+spamassassin.
Thanks,
Maxwell
Even though I'm sure this isn't the answer you want, RTFM. The FM you
should read is the INSTALL file in the distribution, it give
Ed wrote:
Maxwell Ochieng wrote:
The INSTALL manual is talking about user based spamassassin
configuration while on my case its a sitewide configuration
It still applies, since that's how I'm using it. Time to STFW I guess
then...
...to clarify, by STFW, try google...you'll
Maxwell Ochieng wrote:
The INSTALL manual is talking about user based spamassassin
configuration while on my case its a sitewide configuration
It still applies, since that's how I'm using it. Time to STFW I guess
then...
--
R
wing
you a rough kind of respect simply by not ignoring you. You should
instead thank him for his grandmotherly kindness."
I was originally going to ignore this, but I thought better of it, hence
this reply.
/me thinks he should make thi
Y
system, IMHO.
Ed
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourcef
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
At 07:23 AM Friday, 10/3/2003, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote -=>
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Ed Kasky wrote:
> Our highest score since Sunday:
> spamd[21411]: identified spam (55.0/7.0)
>
> Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 1242
> Number of spams :
amassassin to automatically report high
scoring spam to razor?
If not, what would be a good way to do this? I suppose I could write a
filter to call spamassassin -r ...
(I'm using it on a relay server and so right now it is a manual process
for me if I want to submit a mail.)
Ed Kas
That particular report was generated using:
http://www.gryzor.com/tools/#spamstats
I also use another script that I found that works in conjunction with MRTG
to generate graphs:
http://users.2z.net/rpuhek/scripts_public/spamd/
HTH...
Ed
At 11:17 AM Friday, 10/3/2003, you wrote -=>
How
Total spam volume : 1134 kbytes
Total clean volume : 5 Mbytes
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Mike Carlson wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what is the highest scoring anyone has seen SA give a
> message? I had one come through at 37.54 the other day.
nce upgrading to 2.6, I have seen message take as little as .5
second up to over a minute. I just haven't had time to debug and see where
it's slowing down at times...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"Opportunities multiply as they are
Got it - thanks.
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 12:54, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:36:31PM -0700, Ed Young wrote:
> > Are the SA 2.6 RPM's for Redhat available anywhere?
>
> Same place as usual. Check out http://spamassass
Are the SA 2.6 RPM's for Redhat available anywhere?
Thanks.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
At 07:57 PM Wednesday, 9/24/2003, Bernd Kuhls wrote -=>
On Mi 24 Sep 2003 06:21:34p Ed Kasky wrote:
> >debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found.
Sep 24 16:03:23 router dccifd[861]: 1.2.7 listening to
/etc/apache/mail/dcc/dccifd
My netsat:
unix 2 [ ACC ]
I just installed 2.60 and while checking my install noticed the following:
>debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found.
I saw in the change logs that support was now built into SA and was
wondering it it was worth the effort to get it running...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles,
I've been getting a bunch of really simplistic messages that are not enough
to generate four points. Something like:
Totally happy ladies open to behave as madly as you ask.
Go for it.
I'm not here
Each one uses different link and remove text.
Has anybody found some good rules to catch these?
I'd like to add Bayes filtering to catch a bit of spam that's passing
through. I have some questions, if I may...
It says I have to send a large corpus of recent mail through it sorted as
spam and non-spam. I have a large corpus of non-spam in my archives, but
it's not recent. Do I have to wor
urs before Received: date
1.6 MISSING_MIMEOLEMessage has X-MSMail-Priority, but no
X-MimeOLE
0.5 MIME_BOUND_NEXTPARTSpam tool pattern in MIME boundary
2.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
--
Ed Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Descri
I too would like to know - the only copy I could find on my machine was in
the source directory dated at the time of my last update...
Ed
At 07:33 PM Thursday, 7/31/2003, Sanjay K. Patel wrote -=>
How can someone generate this report on the their local copy of
spamassassin?
-SKP
-Origi
result, instead of seeing .3 to 1.5 seconds, I am seeing 5 to 15 seconds.
I double checked dns and router settings and they seem to be functioning
normally - no dropped packets, etc.
Any suggestions as to how you to approach this or where to look next are
greatly appreciated...
Ed Kasky
Los
ifferent user or as root? I tried running it as
spamd but then realized I'd have to change permissions on all the home
directories and haven't take that leap as of yet.
If I remember correctly, Theo put a fix for this into 2.60-cvs...
I'll look for it on cpan when it becomes ava
Razor v2.34
>
> If I turn Razor2 off, I get times of .5 to 1.5 seconds. Otherwise it's 3
> to
> 4.5.
>
> Could this be related to cpu speed or dns or my setup?
>
> Inquiring minds want to know ;-)
Hi Ed,
Check back through the archives for messages from me for an explan
11738]: [ 6] Found 1 Discovery Servers via DNS
in the
razor2.cloudmark.com zone
Would it help do you think if I put the discovery server entries in the
hosts file?
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
Don't let your mouth write no
x27;s 3 to
4.5.
Could this be related to cpu speed or dns or my setup?
Inquiring minds want to know ;-)
Happy Father's day to all the fathers out there!!!
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember.
Who learned everything he knows about SA from the members who contribute to
this list..
:-)
At 07:40 AM Friday, 6/13/2003, Dan O'Brien wrote -=>
Special thanks to Ed Kasky for pointing me in the right direction.
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
The washing machine in my he
uch paper.
> I'm not bothering!
--
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
~~~
Friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. D
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Better a bozo than a mish man, some might say. We've all been / will be
> bozos at some time or another (ever done 'rm -r' in a directory where
> you shouldn't?)
Curious minds have to know....
What is a "mis
looked at my razor-agent.log, but it's not very infomative.
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
We are born naked and hungry and it's down hill from there.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, Th
t office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
If you hav
thout warning people what was coming
and what they could expect. What are the chances that all their customers
read that email?
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
Bad day: Spouse is reading a new book : "Celibacy. The Secret Weapon."
At the risk of sounding either naive or stupid - or both...
What exactly is the difference between 'spam' and 'ham'? (aside from the
obvious culinary differences;)
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"If a man harbors any sort of fear, it percolates through all
At 03:58 PM 2/12/2003 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
On Tuesday, Feb 11, 2003, at 19:07 Canada/Mountain, Ed Benckert wrote:
Seems like the work put in to dynamically add 'bad sites' based on spam
to a web filter is a waste of time. The problem is spam, not people
clicking on links in spam.
A
ved 2 legitimate emails without plain text in those 7 years.
--
Ed Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---
=END EXAMPLE==
--
Ed Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
skip the filter.
Is there something I am missing?
Just a shot in the dark, but, did you create any recipes in .procmailrc?
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
There are 3 kinds of people, those who can count & those who can't.
---
ch time.
Well, must reload Mt. Dew now... good luck!
Ed Freeberg
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailin
to limit how many ports I open to traffic.
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"It's not a very big step from contentment to complacency."
- Simone De Beauvoir
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
specific port (like 8080) or do I
need to open 2703 for the reporting?
TIA for any help on this...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"Main's Law"
For every action there is an equal and opposite government program.
I'm pretty sure I've seen it before, but cannot for the life of me find it
now... can spamassassin tag an email as spam if it's over a certain
threshold, but under another, and if its over that threshold, just nuke it
as obvious spam?
Like if it's 0-4.9 it's ok.
5-19.9 it's Spam, but delivered
At 06:15 AM 9/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm thinking "antivirus application"
>
>On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Ed Greenberg wrote:
>
> > I get a bunch of mail that looks like this:
> >
By the time I see it, it's mime has somehow been broken. It just shows up
I get a bunch of mail that looks like this:
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from out008.verizon.net (out008pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.108])
> by hagrid.greenberg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCF146CB
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
>R
on't remember what MTA is involved but Sendmail using smrsh will
complain about a piped alias. I found this out when I added demime to my
majordomo aliases.
I wound up having to take the latter course in order to run the multiple
commands based on an alias.
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . .
A.
>
Stop using the per user vpopmail configs. Get rid of the "-v -u vpopmail"
switches and it will only use site wide files usually located in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Turn on debugging to see more info and
what config files are being used.
Ed.
Did you restart spamd after modifying the config files?
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hess,
> Mtodd, /mth
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:22 PM
> To: satalk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] HTML changed to plai
Read "man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf"
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hess,
> Mtodd, /mth
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: satalk
> Subject: [SAtalk] HTML changed to plain text
>
&g
h/to/foo/Maildir/
Now the mail will get delivered using vdeliver rather than being written
directly to the Maildir/ dir therefore utilizing .qmail-default.
___
Ed.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two, two, TWO treats in on
What mail server software are you planning to use on the Linux server?
sendmail, qmail, etc..? Once you decide then that will determine how to
implement SA in the manner that you want.
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behal
gal\b/i
describe PORN_1 Uses words and phrases which indicate porn (1)
scorePORN_1 3.092
category PORN_1 SEXUALLY_EXPLICIT
This approach would allow you to easily create custom categories and not
neccessarily be limited to a fixed few. Briefly looking thru some of the
rules it would seem alot of
easy to
add some categories for them to pick.
So if anyone else thinks this would be useful what other categories are
there? Here is what Postini offers:
Sexually Explicit
Get Rich Quick
Racially Insensitive
Special Offers
Bulk Mail
My 1.7 cents worth,
Ed.
-
about
RFCs.
---Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Derrick 'dman' Hudson
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 12:47 PM
> To: satalk
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: FAKED_UNDISC_RECIPS rule [was "Rule misfires&q
BTW, I just submitted this one to bugzilla as bug
#519 just in case anyone is planning to look
at this.
--->Ed
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
CertaintyTech - Ed HendersonSent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 9:36
A
s
5.50.4522.1200X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V5.50.4522.1200X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9
required=5.0
tests=TO_MALFORMED,FAKED_UNDISC_RECIPS,HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR,
MAILTO_LINK,AWL
version=2.31X-Spam-Level:
---Ed.
, 5 required; * 1.4 -- Subject: is empty or
missing * -0.7 -- BODY: Contains 'Dear Somebody' * 4.4
-- 'From' juno.com does not match 'Received' headers * -0.0 -- AWL:
Auto-whitelist adjustment- Ed
re than one school of thought on this
issue. I am subscribing to the theory that if it's spam, whether SA caught
it or not, I report it as described below.
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Ed Kasky wrote:
>> I had the same thought when I first starting using SA ;-)
>>
>> I d
C (2)822)
>
> I haven't checked the rule itself, BTW.
Yes. It was in the form 'To: '.
>
> | FORGED_JUNO_RCVD:
>
> This is bugged. I rescored it to 0 when my parents' (juno) mail
> triggered it. I
aders appeared fine but
they were still tagged as forged.
Unfortunately, I do not have any copies of these emails to help with the
discussion but am hoping that others have seen this and have some input.
Thanks,
Ed.
---
This sf.net ema
ssassin/Conf.pm: ``-D'' should be [CB]<-D>
/usr/bin/pod2man: bad option in paragraph 301 of
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm: ``-D'' should be [CB]<-D>
/usr/bin/pod2man: bad option in paragraph 370 of
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm: ``-R'' should be [C
Google is the only way to go...
Ed
At 02:25 PM Thursday, 5/30/2002, you wrote -=>
>Geocrawler is shit. No search features what so ever...
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
"It has been my experience that folks who have no vices have very
few virtues."
-
Sidney -
Could you post that procmail recipe to the list?
Ed
~~
At 04:27 PM Monday, 5/20/2002, Sidney Markowitz wrote -=>
>On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 14:18, Peter Scott wrote:
> > Does anyone have a rule for matching the Klez virus?
>
>Following Craig's suggestion, made
We are proposing to use SA on our main mail gateways. Unfortunately,
users need (want) to know what rules caused a particular message to
classify as spam. I agree that keeping the info in the headers is a
technically eloquent solution, but it is a human factor thing...
Ed...
-Original
called handlespam. I don't have the url handy but if you
go to www.kluge.net/~felicity you should be able to find what you need...
It's been working very well for me.
Ed
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Igor Demi wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Can spam assasin be configured so that if it reje
Title: Message
Gotta
give us more info. What mail system are you using? There are a
myriad of ways to integrate SA. Most use procmail or maildrop for final
delivery and this is where SA gets called.
---
Ed.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
If you're using spamd then add the "-x" switch.
--
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin
> Hemenway
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Stopping
er script that executes qmail-queue MUST NOT be setuid, and
MUST BE readable. Only the real qmail-queue binary needs to be
setuid.
This seems to say that it will block email.
___
Ed.
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking
Take a look at the new vpopmail integration in SA 2.20 first before
resorting to SQL. See the README.spamd-vpopmail in the spamd dir of the
2.20 distribution for details. It gives support for virtual vpopmail users.
I wrote the patch and use it daily and works great.
--
Ed.
>
>
check" in each of the user's dir that do not want SA. I do this
> for maildrop but don't know how to do it for procmail. Perhaps
> others could
> tell you how to accomplish this in procmail.
>
> --
> Ed.
I just found an old .procmailrc that may help you:
# Tes
dir that do not want SA. I do this
for maildrop but don't know how to do it for procmail. Perhaps others could
tell you how to accomplish this in procmail.
--
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken
> Causey
>
curious to see what others are using and how you do it.
Thanks for any suggestions,
Ed.
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED
h them. Are
they used to improve rules or just added the spam corpus?
---
Ed.
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
"man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" is your friend. Look for "report_header"
option.
---
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken
> Causey
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:54 PM
> To: SA Talk
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> > >
> > > > :0 fw
> > > > |spamassassin -d
> > > >
> > > >
ing a database does make sense for larger
sites and especially if you are already running it for other apps.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
# then bail and exit with permanent failure
echo "Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)"
EXITCODE=100
exit
}
This is added at the very beginning of the .mailfilter file.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
> Anyone else here trying to use SpamAssassin to filter
> ALL incoming mail for many users in Vpopmail on Qmail?
>
> Is Qmail-Scanner the way to go? http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
> ifspamh? http://www.gbnet.net/~jrg/qmail/ifspamh
>
> Any tips/URLs/FAQs appreciated.
> I'm pret
livering
> mail
>
> So... any suggestions?
>
> Thanks much,
>
> Miles Fidelman
Something like:
:0 fw
|spamassassin -d
:0:
$MAIL
First line filters message thru spamassassin and then second line delivers
it.
---
Ed.
___
Spam
Create custom rule like:
header OLDADDRESS Delivered-To =~ /brians-old-address\@enchanter\.net/i
describe OLDADDRESS This is an old address
score OLDADDRESS 100.0
Now any message with Delivered-To: header will get a score of 100 and
therefore get tagged as Spam.
---
Ed.
>
> I have so
whole bunch and I believe at least one opensource one.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
7 is the most common at my site.
---
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric
> S. Johansson
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: Klaus Heinz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] false positive
etween outgoing and incoming
mail - all mail is run thru SA. Next version, soon to be released (when
Jason gets back from vaca), will do this.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
popmail maildir. This gets around
the problem of vpopmail users being virtual and having no /etc/passwd entry
and therefore no homedir to store user_prefs.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> Let's say I've got an e-mail that is a false-positive and has an
> attachment and/or is in HTML format. Because SpamAssassin inserts
> the detailed results into the body of the message, it won't be
> displayed by (lets say) Eudora as an HTML message. Everyone here uses
> POP clients, so the mes
cmail.)
-Original Message- From: CertaintyTech
- Ed Henderson Sent: Wed 4/17/2002 4:50 PM To: Nick
Fisher; Christopher Davis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Porn mail deleting for
school
> By policy we used to strip ALL attachments. That could
> By policy we used to strip ALL attachments. That could work out
> the problems
> above but only if it was done before spamd gets the mail.
>
> Nick
This where something like MIMEdefang could help you.
---
Ed.
___
Spamassass
No you can't. Q-S will only run spamc and doesn't block or quarantine any
Spam messages. It has to be done further down the delivery pipe using
maildrop or procmail.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Christopher Davis
> Sent: Wedne
>
>
> You guys are great. I love initiating good conversation. You've brought
> some very points to the table, includiung legal issues. Anyway -- my
> problem still remains. Any ideas how to set up maildrop rules to do this?
> Thanks for the tip Ed.
> BTW -- Tha
o you use for delivery? procmail or maildrop?
--
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
At 11:39 AM Monday, 4/15/2002, Craig R Hughes wrote -=>
>EK> Outstanding! Another Giants fan....
>
>EK> Ed Kasky
>EK> Los Angeles, CA
> ^^^
>
>Ouch! That must suck.
Only when I'm stuck in traffic or yearning for Clement St. dim sum on
x format.
>
If you run spamd with "-F 1" option doesn't it do this for you? This may
fix you problem.
--
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
At 10:01 AM Monday, 4/15/2002, Craig R Hughes wrote -=>
>blame the weather. I was out in the park listening to the Giants on the
>radio
Outstanding! Another Giants fan
Ed
~~
Ed Kasky
Los Angeles, CA
. . . . . . . .
Some people would not recognize subtlety if it hit them on
> Spamassassin is correctly identifying emails as spam but seems to
> corrupting
> the mailbox when writing the email back to it.
>
> I am using the daemon and spamc via procmail.
>
Post your procmail recipe. Problem probably lies there.
___
Spamas
Why not do all 3 private ip ranges?
10.0.0.0- 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix)
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 (172.16/12 prefix)
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix)
Ed
At 11:04 PM Thursday, 4/11/2002, Craig R Hughes wrote -=>
>dman wrote:
>
>d>
> > It is. It's just only in there as source, not a binary.
> >
> any takers as to why it's only there as source?
> --
> Duncan Findlay
>
I believe its because of the qmail licensing. You can distribute source
freely bu
Title: User_prefs location
Per
user preferences go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs. Site wide preferences
are typically stored in /etc/mail/spamassass/local.cf
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy
GramataSent: Thursday, April
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
