> > | FAKED_UNDISC_RECIPS: This rule misfired on a
few emails that were
> > | legitimately sent BCC.
> >
>
> Was this an outhouse bug? ( 'To:
<Undisclosed-Recipient:;>' -- not a
> > valid header per
RFC (2)822)
> >
> > I haven't checked the rule itself,
BTW.
>
> Yes. It was in the form 'To:
<Undisclosed-Recipient:;>'.
>
I have registered this one
on Bugzilla as bug #517. Here is an example of headers from such a message
sent from Outlook Express:
Return-Path:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 11937 invoked by uid 150); 5
Jul 2002 20:28:02 -0400
Delivered-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 11905 invoked by
uid 114); 5 Jul 2002 20:28:02 -0400
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by
gen by uid 111 with qmail-scanner-1.12 (sophie: 2.10/3.58. . Clear:. Processed
in 1.04815 secs); 06 Jul 2002 00:28:02 -0000
Received: from
coch71-12.certainty.net (HELO jsykescertainty) (65.164.71.12)
by
mail.certainty.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2002 20:28:00 -0400
Message-ID:
<003d01c22483$842aac20$0200a8c0@net>
From: "James Sykes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;>
Subject:
"Under God" and the Pledge of Allegiance
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 20:24:14
-0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01C22461.EE231760"
X-Priority:
3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express
5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V5.50.4522.1200
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9
required=5.0
tests=TO_MALFORMED,FAKED_UNDISC_RECIPS,HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR,
MAILTO_LINK,AWL
version=2.31
X-Spam-Level:
---Ed.
