We are proposing to use SA on our main mail gateways. Unfortunately, users need (want) to know what rules caused a particular message to classify as spam. I agree that keeping the info in the headers is a technically eloquent solution, but it is a human factor thing...
Ed... -----Original Message----- From: Olivier M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:08 AM To: Ed Ames Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Grading Information as attachment On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 11:00:07AM -0500, Ed Ames wrote: > Has any thought been given to formatting the SpamAssassin "grading > information" as a legit attachment rather than simple adding it to the > beginning of the message body as text. Unfortunately, the text added > to the beginning of the message really messes up some of the HTML > encoded messages (some legit) that are classified as SPAM. no idea, but I think the best way is still to keep everything into the message headers, with for example this local.cf: required_hits 5.0 subject_tag [*spam*] rewrite_subject 1 report_header 1 use_terse_report 1 defang_mime 0 ok_locales en fr de it es sv lk pl regards, Olivier -- _________________________________________________________________ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch _______________________________________________________________ Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program. Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
