RE: [SAtalk] Re: Rule misfires

[CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson]

> I'm at least partly responsible for that one, since I forwarded (but did
> not invent) the procmail recipe on which it is based.  Can you send along
> the header of a legitimate juno message?
>
>

Here you go:

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 28710 invoked by uid 114); 1 Jul 2002 18:20:56 -0400
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by gen by uid 111 with qmail-scanner-1.12 (sophie: 2.10/3.58. .
 Clear:. Processed in 0.250327 secs); 01 Jul 2002 22:20:56 -0000
Received: from m4.jersey.juno.com (64.136.22.67)
  by mail.certainty.net with SMTP; 1 Jul 2002 18:20:55 -0400
Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for <"l4iOzAxmPs9ItSX3dwuqAWcOtZpvrz+L/3XD4aho3uppuWePD5Yo2A==">
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 by m4.jersey.juno.com (jqueuemail) id G6NS6BH5; Mon, 01 Jul 2002 18:19:10 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:12:01 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Juno 4.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,5,8-10
X-Juno-Att: 0
X-Juno-RefParts: 0
From: Ronald E Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.1 required=5.0
        tests=SUBJ_MISSING,DEAR_SOMEBODY,FORGED_JUNO_RCVD,AWL
        version=2.31
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.31 (devel $Id: SpamAssassin.pm,v 1.94.2.2 2002/06/20 17:20:29 hughescr Exp $)
X-Spam-Report:   5.1 hits, 5 required;
  *  1.4 -- Subject: is empty or missing
  * -0.7 -- BODY: Contains 'Dear Somebody'
  *  4.4 -- 'From' juno.com does not match 'Received' headers
  * -0.0 -- AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment



- Ed