Re: Updating translations for LyX 1.3.6

> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose'> On Friday 07 April 2006 14:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> You can see the resulting stats there:   >> http://www.lyx.org/devel/i18n.php3 Jose'> The url does not end with 3, does it? Jose'> http://www.lyx.org/devel/i18n.php OK,

Re: Updating translations for LyX 1.3.6

On Friday 07 April 2006 14:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > You can see the resulting stats there: >   http://www.lyx.org/devel/i18n.php3 The url does not end with 3, does it? http://www.lyx.org/devel/i18n.php -- José Abílio

Re: Updating translations for LyX 1.3.6 (No! LyX 1.4.1!)

The subject says it all. Wrong cut and paste. Sorry. JMarc

Updating translations for LyX 1.3.6

Dear Translators, We plan to release LyX 1.4.1 next monday or thursday, and it is thus a good idea to update the translations. I just re-merged the po files and imported from 1.3.7 the translations that were better than in 1.4.0. You can see the resulting stats there: http://www.lyx.org/devel/

problem in Istalling Lyx 1.3.6

Dear Sir, I installed the MykeTex first and lastly Lyx 1.3.6. at the end it is giving the message "Lyx was not able to find any layout description". please help me to sort out the problem. with the best regards. Rakesh

Re: No doc installed with Lyx-1.3.6-pre7 (windows)

the docs are in a different repository, and Angus is too lazy to get them :) Ok, the lazy bum finally got them. Funnily enough, the new version is LyX-1.3.6-pre7, so I can just tell Abdel he's wrong ;-) (The version he was using was -pre6.) That's called anticipation... You chang

Re: No doc installed with Lyx-1.3.6-pre7 (windows)

tory, and Angus is too lazy to get them :) Ok, the lazy bum finally got them. Funnily enough, the new version is LyX-1.3.6-pre7, so I can just tell Abdel he's wrong ;-) (The version he was using was -pre6.) Angus

Re: No doc installed with Lyx-1.3.6-pre7 (windows)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Abdel" == Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdel> Dear Angus, I've just tried your new package. It seems that the Abdel> documents in \Resources\lyx\doc\ are missing... This happens because, in 1.3.x the docs are in a different repository, and Angus is too lazy

Re: No doc installed with Lyx-1.3.6-pre7 (windows)

> "Abdel" == Abdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdel> Dear Angus, I've just tried your new package. It seems that the Abdel> documents in \Resources\lyx\doc\ are missing... This happens because, in 1.3.x the docs are in a different repository, and Angus is too lazy to get them :) JMarc

No doc installed with Lyx-1.3.6-pre7 (windows)

Dear Angus, I've just tried your new package. It seems that the documents in \Resources\lyx\doc\ are missing... Abdel.

Lyx 1.3.6 - bug in letter class processing

When using the letter format with Lyx 1.3.6 (downloaded July 2005), if the sendto address is non-empty, lyx inserts the correct \letter{to whoever ...} before the default \letter{}. As a result, the address is suppressed.

Re: Installing LyX 1.3.6 on Win 2000

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sirs, Hello Brian :) > I encountered a particular loop while installing LyX 1.3.6, > which I thought might be useful. > > I installed gsview and acrobat, first in C:/Program > Files/Ghostgum and C:/Program Files/Adobe, and then again later > (try

Installing LyX 1.3.6 on Win 2000

Sirs, I encountered a particular loop while installing LyX 1.3.6, which I thought might be useful. I installed gsview and acrobat, first in C:/Program Files/Ghostgum and C:/Program Files/Adobe, and then again later (trying to solve LyX path problems), directly into C: The loop

Re: greeek panel ceases from math panel in Lyx 1.3.6 for Windows

ers appear normally in a separated window. This was found in Lyx 1.3.6 for Windows. Is this a bug? Yes it is, in the underlying Qt/Win Free library. You might try http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136experimental to see if a more recent version of the library resolves the problem. It doesn'

Re: greeek panel ceases from math panel in Lyx 1.3.6 for Windows

aracters appear normally in a separated window. > > This was found in Lyx 1.3.6 for Windows. Is this a bug? Yes it is, in the underlying Qt/Win Free library. You might try http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136experimental to see if a more recent version of the library resolves the problem. -- Angus

Re: greeek panel ceases from math panel in Lyx 1.3.6 for Windows

ally in a separated window. This was found in Lyx 1.3.6 for Windows. Is this a bug? With best wishes, Gyorgy Pota What version of Windows are you using? I was unable to reproduce this with LyX 1.3.6-1 on Win XP. Paul

greeek panel ceases from math panel in Lyx 1.3.6 for Windows

ow. This was found in Lyx 1.3.6 for Windows. Is this a bug? With best wishes, Gyorgy Pota

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Angus Leeming wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: Sorry, I should have read your first post more carefully. Turns out this is a bug in the 1.3.6 port. Looks like someone forgot to tweak the scanning commands to allow spaces in the path. I'll post this to bugzilla. Meanwhile, as far as I can tell, t

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Sorry, I should have read your first post more carefully. Turns out > this is a bug in the 1.3.6 port. Looks like someone forgot to tweak the > scanning commands to allow spaces in the path. I'll post this to > bugzilla. Meanwhile, as far as I can tell, there shouldn't be

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

- Original Message - From: "Sreekumar Bhaskaran-Nair {msbad084}" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 7:48 PM Subject: Re: Lyx 1.3.6 Wow, at last some light at the end of the tunnel. I had lyx installed in c:\program

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Wow, atlast some light at the end of the tunnel. I had lyx installed in c:\program files\ and msys was in c:\ (that was the default for me too similar to Stephen) Like Stephen mentioned, that seemed to be the problem. I reinstalled lyx in c: and now I am able to access Tex Information and the bst f

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Re: Lyx 1.3.6 Paul A. Rubin Tue, 09 Aug 2005 08:27:14 -0700 Sreekumar Bhaskaran-Nair {msbad084} wrote: Hi, Sh.exe is in the path for me. I am not sure whether this is the problem, but when I first installed lyx 1.3.6, I had 1.3.5 already installed. But subsequently, I uninstalled everything and

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Sreekumar Bhaskaran-Nair {msbad084} wrote: Hi, Sh.exe is in the path for me. I am not sure whether this is the problem, but when I first installed lyx 1.3.6, I had 1.3.5 already installed. But subsequently, I uninstalled everything and started from scratch. There's no conflict between

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Sreekumar Bhaskaran-Nair {msbad084} wrote: > Sorry for the multiple emails. I have been breaking my head over > this. I checked the directory ..\resources\lyx\help and there were > two files there: > Bibtex.hlp and texinfo.hlp Now, when I click on them, I get a > message that it is not a windows h

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Sorry for the multiple emails. I have been breaking my head over this. I checked the directory ..\resources\lyx\help and there were two files there: Bibtex.hlp and texinfo.hlp Now, when I click on them, I get a message that it is not a windows help file or that the file might be corrupted Thanks,

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Forgot to include that I was able to assign the .sh files to sh.exe after I cleaned the registry off all mys and lyx references and then reinstalled msys and lyx Sree

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Hi, Sh.exe is in the path for me. I am not sure whether this is the problem, but when I first installed lyx 1.3.6, I had 1.3.5 already installed. But subsequently, I uninstalled everything and started from scratch. Since it didn't work even then, the last time around, I went to registr

Re: Lyx 1.3.6

Sreekumar Bhaskaran-Nair {msbad084} wrote: Hi, I noticed two things while installing Lyx 1.3.6 on Win XP 1. I went through the steps as described in wiki website. The problem is I am not able to assign the .sh files to open with sh.exe which in the minsys folder. Because of this, I am also not

Lyx 1.3.6

Hi, I noticed two things while installing Lyx 1.3.6 on Win XP 1. I went through the steps as described in wiki website. The problem is I am not able to assign the .sh files to open with sh.exe which in the minsys folder. Because of this, I am also not able to get any information when I click on

Re: Lyx 1.3.6 for windows

nces" that has been created by the user, but the Windows Installer that you use to install LyX 1.3.6 won't create it. If the user goes on to create it, it'll be found at C:\Documents and Settings\USER\Application Data\LyX\preferences or whatever the equivalent location on a mac

Lyx 1.3.6 for windows

Hello I discovered Lyx 2 years ago and using it a lot since than. I am working with math teachers and told some of them about Lyx but it turns out that for non computer expert it is quite complicated to install . Since in Israel we need the Hebrew version that needs some more files. I prepared a

Re: LyX 1.3.6 Installation Error

Eric May wrote: Hi- I get the following error upon completion of running the windows installer for lyx. Lyx wasn't able to find its layout descriptions! Check that the file "textclass.lst" is installed correctly. Sorry has to exit. The file does not exist on my system, is there a place to

LyX 1.3.6 Installation Error

Hi- I get the following error upon completion of running the windows installer for lyx. Lyx wasn't able to find its layout descriptions! Check that the file "textclass.lst" is installed correctly. Sorry has to exit. The file does not exist on my system, is there a place to get it? Or any ot

Re: Compiling Lyx 1.3.6/5 on Ubuntu: Collision with tetex-extra

Am Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2005 15:48 schrieb Alexander Dietz: > I am using Ubuntu Linux 5.04. I am trying to compile and install Lyx > 1.3.5 and 1.3.6 with > ./configure --with-frontend=qt --with-qt-dir=/usr/share/qt3 > --prefix=/usr > make > sudo checkinstall > > I get following problem: Lyx is tr

Compiling Lyx 1.3.6/5 on Ubuntu: Collision with tetex-extra

x/lyx-1.3.6/build-tree-qt/src/support' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/alex/lyx-1.3.6/build-tree-qt/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/alex/lyx-1.3.6/build-tree-qt/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leav

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.6 is released, with native Windows support

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Jean-Marc - I've got the Mac version ready, and I've placed Bennett> it here: Bennett> . Bennett> Can you put it on the proper server for me? Thanks, I did it. Bennett>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.6 is released, with native Windows support

Jean-Marc - I've got the Mac version ready, and I've placed it here: . Can you put it on the proper server for me? One minor correction to the ANNOUNCE/NEWS files concerning Mac: * It is possible to use Ctrl-PageDown and Control-P

Re: libtool problems with lyx 1.3.6

Am Montag, 18. Juli 2005 12:15 schrieb Martti Kuparinen: > Hi! > > I'm trying to update the lyx packages on NetBSD's pkgsrc. Currently > the compilation fails like this. Any ideas? Did you run configure with --enable-shared? If so, run it without that option, it does not work. If not, try --disa

libtool problems with lyx 1.3.6

*** [libsupport.la] Error 1 ROOT n74:/tmp/lyx-xforms/work/lyx-1.3.6/src/support> ROOT n74:/tmp/lyx-xforms/work/lyx-1.3.6/src/support> cat package.lo timestamp ROOT n74:/tmp/lyx-xforms/work/lyx-1.3.6/src/support> ROOT n74:~> libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.18 (1.1220.2.245 2005/05/16 08:55:27)

Re: SuSE 9.2 rpm of LyX 1.3.6 uploaded

> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> I have uploaded a SuSE 9.2 rpm (qt frontend) to Georg> ftp.devel.lyx.org. Please move to the correct location. Thanks, I put it on the ftp site. JMarc

Re: LyX 1.3.6 rpms for Fedora Core 3

>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc, I've uploaded Fedora Core 3 rpms to Angus> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming Angus> lyx-1.3.6-1_qt_fc3.i386.rpm lyx-1.3.6-1_xforms_fc3.i386.rpm Thanks, they are on the ftp site now. JMarc

Re: Lyx 1.3.6 Installation fails on Windows XP

Peter Rockett wrote: > When I run the Lyx setup I get a popup saying: ?Failed attempting to > execute configure script? which appears just after ?Extract reLyx? and > ?Output folder: C:\Program Files\Lyx?. (I am installing as > administrator.) You must have a working unix shell installed and LyX

Lyx 1.3.6 Installation fails on Windows XP

When I run the Lyx setup I get a popup saying: “Failed attempting to execute configure script” which appears just after “Extract reLyx” and “Output folder: C:\Program Files\Lyx”. (I am installing as administrator.) When I try to run Lyx from either the installation procedure or afterwards, I g

LyX 1.3.6 rpms for Fedora Core 3

Jean-Marc, I've uploaded Fedora Core 3 rpms to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/incoming lyx-1.3.6-1_qt_fc3.i386.rpm lyx-1.3.6-1_xforms_fc3.i386.rpm -- Angus

SuSE 9.2 rpm of LyX 1.3.6 uploaded

I have uploaded a SuSE 9.2 rpm (qt frontend) to ftp.devel.lyx.org. Please move to the correct location. Georg

[ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.3.6 is released, with native Windows support

Public release of LyX version 1.3.6 === We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.3.6. Unix and MacOSX users should consider this to be a bugfix release. To Windows users, however, LyX 1.3.6 is the first version of LyX to support the platform officially

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #3]

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> LyX builds, installs, and runs just fine (from the included Bennett> LyX/Mac skeleton). A few comments: That's very good. Bennett> (Note the difference in capitalization of "lyx" in Bennett> LyX.app/Contents/Resources/lyx.) Thi

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #3]

On Jul 15, 2005, at 1:30 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I put a prerelease distribution of lyx 1.3.6 at ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/snapshot/lyx-1.3.6cvs.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/snapshot/patch-1.3.6cvs.gz I think all the open problems are fixed. I added the patch to change

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Don't I remember you saying that autoconf was quite fragile Angus> when it comes to messing around with the Resources\$PACKAGE\ Angus> directory name? The problem was that we cannot avoid having PACKAGE at the end of the datadir na

Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #3]

I put a prerelease distribution of lyx 1.3.6 at ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/snapshot/lyx-1.3.6cvs.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/snapshot/patch-1.3.6cvs.gz I think all the open problems are fixed. I added the patch to change the user directory to LyX on windows and OSX (I will

Re: LyX 1.3.6 and gcc 4.0

>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I never said, but LyX 1.3.6 (both XForms and Qt versions) Angus> compiles perfectly with gcc 4.0.1, make maintainer-clean, make. Great!

Re: LyX 1.3.6 and gcc 4.0

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Would it be OK to make this change to > Angus> boost/boost/config/compiler/gcc.hpp? (This is what the > Angus> 1.4 tree already has). > If it is enough to make it compile, yes. I never said, but LyX 1.3.6 (both XForms and Qt versions) co

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

Michael Schmitt wrote: > Angus, I see that you have added two new translatable messages today. > Could you (or Jean-Marc) please commit my patch to de.po for LyX 1.3.6? I've done so, although patch rejected three of the five blocks in your patch. Since these were just line number chan

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I see you committed them. This is good. Angus> Are you commenting on the content or just the fact that I Angus> committed them? Both. Angus> I've created http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136, ready fo

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

ages today. Could you (or Jean-Marc) please commit my patch to de.po for LyX 1.3.6? Thanks! Michael Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/po/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.156.2.104 diff -u -p -r1.156.2.104

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I see you committed them. This is good. Are you commenting on the content or just the fact that I committed them? I've created http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136, ready for the release. Suggestions/improvements are very welcome! As the Qt/Win Free guys squash thei

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

On Jul 14, 2005, at 10:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> There are a few Qt/Win Free bugs outstanding, but the guys Angus> there are working actively to squash them. I don't see any more Angus> "must-fix" bugs in the LyX 1.3.x source

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> README.Win32 (attached) is essentially the first few paragraphs Angus> from http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136pre. A bit of Angus> introductory blurb. Angus> INSTALL.Win32: I attach Michael Schmitt's detailed instructions Angus> on

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

ut we won't support them officially. There were two reasons for this: we didn't have the necessary knowledge or resources and, until recently, only closed-source versions of the Qt GUI library existed. The increasing maturity of the Qt/Win Free project means that this latter point is no longer

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> There are a few Qt/Win Free bugs outstanding, but the guys Angus> there are working actively to squash them. I don't see any more Angus> "must-fix" bugs in the LyX 1.3.x sources. OK, so we should try to release today or tomorrow. I

Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

I wrote on 8 July: > I've just updated the list of bugs in LyX 1.3.6 that I know about. See > http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX136pre#known_bugs > Am I missing anything? > My feeling is that we should at least try and address the first two of > these. I do believe we're a

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Jean-Marc> PS: here is the patch I'll apply soon. > Applied to HEAD and branch. ../configure QTDIR='/usr/lib/qt-3.3' is working perfectly. So, do you need --with-qt-dir et al.? -- Angus

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Marc> PS: here is the patch I'll apply soon. Applied to HEAD and branch. JMarc

Re: LyX 1.3.6 and gcc 4.0

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Would it be OK to make this change to Angus> boost/boost/config/compiler/gcc.hpp? (This is what the 1.4 tree Angus> already has). If it is enough to make it compile, yes. JMarc

Re: Fwd: Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I'm not the only one having problems with the installation of > LyXWin136pre, see below. Unfortunately I'm a bit under stress this week > and wont have time to check what the problem is. My installer version > deletes the folder application data/lyx while uninstalling. But that >

Re: LyX 1.3.6 ANNOUNCE file

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Ah! That explains it. I had set CXXFLAGS for something else Bennett> and that mucked it up. Without setting CXXFLAGS before Bennett> configuring, things are fixed. Good. Bennett> That, of course, means those lines should be rem

Fwd: Re: Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

Hello Angus, I'm not the only one having problems with the installation of LyXWin136pre, see below. Unfortunately I'm a bit under stress this week and wont have time to check what the problem is. My installer version deletes the folder application data/lyx while uninstalling. But that doesn't

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > There are two patches: > > - the first one only uses LyX for the name of the user directory on > OSX (and the same should be done in windows IMO). This is of course > cosmetic > > - the second tries to modify directly PACKAGE to this end. I wrote > when sending

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> PS: here is the patch I'll apply soon. Angus> So I should use it as ../configure QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt-3.3 ? No, you would just have to define QTDIR in the environment, as you already do (albeit with a d

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > PS: here is the patch I'll apply soon. So I should use it as ../configure QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt-3.3 ? -- Angus

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Angus> Jean-Marc would like the thing to be called "LyX" on Mac OS X Angus> and on Windows and "lyx" on POSIX machines. Actually, that's Angus> only part of the story. He'd like it to be called PACKAGE-1.3.6 Angus> if the user requests --version-suffix.

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > It is not the user that names the package (in PACKAGE) that is us. > This is what we have decided as the package name. > And set in configure.ac Jean-Marc would like the thing to be called "LyX" on Mac OS X and on Windows and "lyx" on POSIX machines. Actually, that's

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> If I understand correctly, the deprecated way to invoke Angus> configure is CC=mycc configure The modern recommendation is to Angus> invoke it as configure CC=mycc Both versions have the same effect if a variable is precious, I thi

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

d... >> >> I do not know either. But I guess you have a point. >> >> What about the following patches (pick one)? What about windows? >> >> JMarc > | Windows should follow the Apple path in this I think. > | However, it strikes me that you're trying to be too c

LyX 1.3.6 and gcc 4.0

gcc 4.0 was released on 7 July. Debian unstable is already shipping it as it's default compiler! Compiling LyX 1.3.6 with this compiler produces: In file included from ../../../boost/boost/config.hpp:35, from ../../../boost/boost/signals/signal_template.h

Re: LyX 1.3.6 ANNOUNCE file

On Jul 11, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Angus Leeming wrote: Bennett Helm wrote: What does your apple-hack give? 2.95.2 Here's the entire block from the configure script. Note that it is executed only if GXX is set to "yes". Moreover, if you have predefined CXXFLAGS, then this is used in preference

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> No, I mean that we have a --with-qt-dir arguement that is > Angus> understood by configure and that I use it. Note that QT_DIR is > Angus> not the same as QTDIR which the Qt build system treats as > Angus> "special". > > Is there a reason why you use QT_DIR ins

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I think that the more magic you perform, the more you increase Angus> the likelihood of breaking something. Making these changes just Angus> before a release is a bad idea

Re: LyX 1.3.6 ANNOUNCE file

Bennett Helm wrote: >> What does your apple-hack give? > 2.95.2 Here's the entire block from the configure script. Note that it is executed only if GXX is set to "yes". Moreover, if you have predefined CXXFLAGS, then this is used in preference to the -f-stuff below. Angus if test x$GXX = xyes;

Re: LyX 1.3.6 ANNOUNCE file

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What does your apple-hack give? Bennett> 2.95.2 And what CXXFLAGS variable does it produce? JMarc

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: CONFIGURE="../configure > Angus> --disable-debug >>> Useless on release version > > Angus> I'm not building a release versionn just yet. AFAICT. > > What I care about is to have a minimal configure command line for > people compilin

Re: LyX 1.3.6 ANNOUNCE file

On Jul 11, 2005, at 8:50 AM, Angus Leeming wrote: Bennett Helm wrote: What is your gcc version? The configure script uses -ftemplate-depth-30 for gcc 2.x, but not for later versions. Really? I'm using: Apple Computer, Inc. version gcc-938, based on gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release) The

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

On Jul 11, 2005, at 8:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> PACKAGE is hardcoded in config.h. Eg "lyx" or "lyx-1.3.6cvs". Angus> If people specify PACKAGE as something other than "lyx", then Angus> shouldn't their choice be respected? R

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: CONFIGURE="../configure Angus> --disable-debug >> Useless on release version Angus> I'm not building a release versionn just yet. AFAICT. What I care about is to have a minimal configure command line fo

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> CONFIGURE="../configure --disable-debug > Useless on release version I'm not building a release versionn just yet. AFAICT. > Angus> --prefix='${LYX_INSTALL_DIR}' > Should be useless for normal users. Actually, this is useless for me too. I should use the def

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> We used to do that, but I prefer the current version (I do not >> remember exactly why we changed, though). LyX is LyX and nobody is >> supposed to change that :) Angus> Only in this case you're propo

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We used to do that, but I prefer the current version (I do not > remember exactly why we changed, though). LyX is LyX and nobody is > supposed to change that :) Only in this case you're proposing that LyX is "lyx" on POSIX and LyX is "LyX" on Windows and Mac OS X. >

Re: [PATH 13x] was Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> The allowable length of "mangled_file_name" below is dependent > Angus> on the (unmangled) path to the directory that is to contain > Angus> this file: > > Jean-Marc> Can you pass this directory to the function too? > > ... which is what you did in the followi

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Angus> have this version-suffix stuff that constructs lyx-1.3.6. Why Angus> do we hard code the "lyx" bit? Ie, why don't we have a Angus> "--package-name" option to specify the "lyx" bit that defaults Angus> to "lyx"? What do you want to use

Re: [PATH 13x] was Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> The allowable length of "mangled_file_name" below is dependent > Angus> on the (unmangled) path to the directory that is to contain > Angus> this file: > Can you pass this directory to the function too? That's what I was proposing to do. I'll do it. > Or you

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

ng patches (pick one)? What about windows? > > JMarc Windows should follow the Apple path in this I think. However, it strikes me that you're trying to be too clever. We have this version-suffix stuff that constructs lyx-1.3.6. Why do we hard code the "lyx" bit? Ie, why don't we have a "--package-name" option to specify the "lyx" bit that defaults to "lyx"? -- Angus

Re: [PATH 13x] was Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> The allowable length of "mangled_file_name" below is dependent Angus> on the (unmangled) path to the directory that is to contain Angus> this file: Jean-Marc> Can you pass this directory to the function too? ... which i

Re: [PATH 13x] was Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Jean-Marc, are you happy for me to Angus> commit this patch? >> I would probably have moved max_length and its comment inside >> mangled_filename, but the patch is fine. Angus> H. But what would the

Re: LyX 1.3.6 ANNOUNCE file

Bennett Helm wrote: >> What is your gcc version? The configure script uses >> -ftemplate-depth-30 for gcc 2.x, but not for later versions. > > Really? I'm using: > > Apple Computer, Inc. version gcc-938, based on gcc version 2.95.2 > 19991024 (release) The configure script can't perform magic, y

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> PACKAGE is hardcoded in config.h. Eg "lyx" or "lyx-1.3.6cvs". Angus> If people specify PACKAGE as something other than "lyx", then Angus> shouldn't their choice be respected? Respect? What's that? The idea was to change that into

Re: [PATH 13x] was Remaining LyX 1.3.6 bugs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Jean-Marc, are you happy for me to commit this patch? > > I would probably have moved max_length and its comment inside > mangled_filename, but the patch is fine. H. But what would the interface to mangled_filename be? (I ask because we need something simi

Re: LyX 1.3.6 ANNOUNCE file

On Jul 11, 2005, at 8:18 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Without it, I get the following error (see below). (On Bennett> further experimentation, setting CXXFLAGS to include Bennett> -ftemplate-depth-18 does the trick.) What is yo

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> What about changing "lyx" to "LyX" in PACKAGE? This will work with >>> version suffix stuff. > > Bennett> That would be great. > > OK, here are two patches: > > lyxosx.diff changes lyx to LyX in PACKAGE only for the determination > of the use directory. It is the

Re: LyX 1.3.6 ANNOUNCE file

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Without it, I get the following error (see below). (On Bennett> further experimentation, setting CXXFLAGS to include Bennett> -ftemplate-depth-18 does the trick.) What is your gcc version? The configure script uses -ftemplate-de

Re: Towards LyX 1.3.6 [status update #2]

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What about changing "lyx" to "LyX" in PACKAGE? This will work with >> version suffix stuff. Bennett> That would be great. OK, here are two patches: lyxosx.diff changes lyx to LyX in PACKAGE only for the determination of the use dir

  1   2   3   4   >