Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Angus> PACKAGE is hardcoded in config.h. Eg "lyx" or "lyx-1.3.6cvs".
>> Angus> If people specify PACKAGE as something other than "lyx", then
>> Angus> shouldn't their choice be respected?
>>
>> Respect? What's that?
>>
>> The idea was to change that into LyX or LyX-1.3.6cvs.
>>
>> Angus> I don't know how important this is. Basically, I'm just
>> Angus> thinking out aloud...
>>
>> I do not know either. But I guess you have a point.
>>
>> What about the following patches (pick one)? What about windows?
>>
>> JMarc
>
| Windows should follow the Apple path in this I think.
>
| However, it strikes me that you're trying to be too clever. We have this
| version-suffix stuff that constructs lyx-1.3.6. Why do we hard code the
| "lyx" bit? Ie, why don't we have a "--package-name" option to specify the
| "lyx" bit that defaults to "lyx"?
It is not the user that names the package (in PACKAGE) that is us.
This is what we have decided as the package name.
And set in configure.ac
--
Lgb
