Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023 à 23:38 +0200, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> > As of 2.25.6, the difference between the two forms of \tweak no longer
>> > appears necessary: globally replacing thousands of "- \tweak ..." with
>> > just "\tweak ..." now seems to work perfectly.
Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023 à 23:38 +0200, David Kastrup a écrit :
> > As of 2.25.6, the difference between the two forms of \tweak no longer
> > appears necessary: globally replacing thousands of "- \tweak ..." with
> > just "\tweak ..." now seems to work perfectly.
>
> Don't.
If the syntax wa
Trevor Bača writes:
> Are hyphens no longer required to prefix postevent tweaks?
They are still required.
> For years I've been writing a hyphen ...
>
> - \tweak color #red
> \startTextSpan
>
> ... to tweak text spanners but no hyphen ...
>
> \
Hi,
Are hyphens no longer required to prefix postevent tweaks?
For years I've been writing a hyphen ...
- \tweak color #red
\startTextSpan
... to tweak text spanners but no hyphen ...
4
... to tweak note heads.
As of 2.25.6, the difference between the two forms of \tweak no l
Hello Sam,
for 1) you can do something like
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\remove Dot_column_engraver
}
\context {
\Voice
\consists Dot_column_engraver
}
}
<<
{ 2. } \\
{ \once \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #2.5 2. }
>>
This is not as dynamic as we’d want it to b
Hi Sam,
*Tweak 2*
current result:
tweak-2-ties.jpg
soprano line: | bf2 af4 |
alto line: | f( ef) c |
tenor line: ||
bass line: | g2 d4 |
problem: I want to add a slur between the two 1st tenor notes and
another one between the two second tenor notes.
Please always give a compilable
Hi -
I can't figure out how to tweak two bits of my score so it looks the way I
want.
*Tweak 1*
current result
[image: tweak-1-dots.jpg]
current code
soprano line: bf4 | 2.| 2.
alto line: 4 | \once \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #2.0 2. | \once \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #1.7 2.
Hi Evan,
For what it’s worth.
Since I am not yet an experienced user of “regular’ tweaks, I would have used a
different solution to this problem, i.e. moving the Markup texts to a second
voice with hidden notes.
I give you my solution here but I have to warn you that I never use \relative
c
Perfect, thanks!
Evan
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 3:08 PM Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Evan,
> How about: -\tweak X-offset #3 ^\markup{\italic "long"}
> Cherrs,
> Pierre
>
> Le dim. 23 juin 2019 à 21:59, Evan Driscoll a écrit :
>
>> So first, thanks again
Hi Evan,
How about: -\tweak X-offset #3 ^\markup{\italic "long"}
Cherrs,
Pierre
Le dim. 23 juin 2019 à 21:59, Evan Driscoll a écrit :
> So first, thanks again for the people who replied to my last questions.
>
> Now I've got a problem with a measure that is too busy where I want to
> space some
So first, thanks again for the people who replied to my last questions.
Now I've got a problem with a measure that is too busy where I want to
space some things out. I'm pretty new to this level of fine tuning, and
still trying to figure things out. Here's the relevant section:
\language "engli
David Kastrup writes:
> Andrew Bernard writes:
>
>> I have many chords where a note is a harmonic. I use the following for the
>> note inside the chord:
>>
>> \tweak NoteHead.stencil #ly:text-interface::print
>> \tweak NoteHead.font-size #1
>> \tweak NoteHead.text #(markup #:musicglyph "n
Thanks so much David and off list repliers.
I'm deeply grateful for the generous help on this amazing list.
Here's what works nicely:
\version "2.19.82"
harmonicNote =
\tweak NoteHead.stencil #ly:text-interface::print
\tweak NoteHead.font-size #1
\tweak NoteHead.text #(markup #:musicglyph "no
Andrew Bernard writes:
> I have many chords where a note is a harmonic. I use the following for the
> note inside the chord:
>
> \tweak NoteHead.stencil #ly:text-interface::print
> \tweak NoteHead.font-size #1
> \tweak NoteHead.text #(markup #:musicglyph "noteheads.s0mi")
>
> How can I mak
I have many chords where a note is a harmonic. I use the following for the
note inside the chord:
\tweak NoteHead.stencil #ly:text-interface::print
\tweak NoteHead.font-size #1
\tweak NoteHead.text #(markup #:musicglyph "noteheads.s0mi")
How can I make this into what I am tempted to call a
gt; g2
>> -\tweak Y-offset #0.25
>> \glissando a
>> }
>> two = \relative c'' {
>> \context Voice = "one" {
>> c2
>> % this tweak is never applied
>> % -\tweak Y-offset #-0.25
>> \glissando d
>>
e = "one" {
> c2
> % this tweak is never applied
> % -\tweak Y-offset #-0.25
> \glissando d
> }
> }
> \new Staff <<
> \new Voice = "one" \one
> \two
> >>
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> A while ago, there was a func
taff <<
\new Voice = "one" \one
\two
>>
Thanks,
Peter
A while ago, there was a function created that allowed tweaks like
you're asking - I think this is what you are looking for :) It should
get you started.
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/How-to-tweak-overr
On 12/6/2018 7:49 PM, Peter Crighton wrote:
Hello all,
I have the following (reduced) scenario where one voice has a chord
with a glissando in it and I want to tweak both glissandos
differently. Is it possible? The second (currently commented out)
tweak is never applied even if I comment out
On 12/6/2018 7:49 PM, Peter Crighton wrote:
Hello all,
I have the following (reduced) scenario where one voice has a chord
with a glissando in it and I want to tweak both glissandos
differently. Is it possible? The second (currently commented out)
tweak is never applied even if I comment out
Hello all,
I have the following (reduced) scenario where one voice has a chord with a
glissando in it and I want to tweak both glissandos differently. Is it
possible? The second (currently commented out) tweak is never applied even
if I comment out the first tweak.
\version "2.19.82"
one = \relat
Helge Kruse writes:
> Am 06.10.2018 um 12:32 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
>> makeSpace = #(define-event-function (size) (number?)
>> #{
>> -\tweak #'stencil #(ly:make-stencil '() '(0 . 0.1) `(0
>> . ,size) ) _""
>> #}
>> )
>
> Hi Lukas,
Am 06.10.2018 um 12:32 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
> makeSpace = #(define-event-function (size) (number?)
> #{
> -\tweak #'stencil #(ly:make-stencil '() '(0 . 0.1) `(0
> . ,size) ) _""
> #}
> )
Hi Lukas,
this works for me. I wasn't awa
Hi Helge,
I want to save typing and it's tedious to write the complete tweak each
time. But the Y size must be adapted each time. Therefore a function is
necessary to change the current required value that is 6 in the example.
I've experimented with define-markup-command and define-music-functi
Hi,
I want to use kneed beams for my score. These look ugly if the system
system distance is too small. Therefor I extend the spacing as in the
following example. Removing the percent character gives a reasonable
spacing.
\version "2.18.2"
\language "deutsch"
staffUpper = { \change Staff="upper"
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 01.03.2018 17:51, Michael Stickles wrote:
>> It was driving me crazy at first because it still wouldn't work,
>> until I dug through the documentation a bit more and found that 2.18
>> and 2.19 have a slightly different syntax for the
>> function arguments:
>
> Truly t
On 01.03.2018 17:51, Michael Stickles wrote:
It was driving me crazy at first because it still wouldn't work, until
I dug through the documentation a bit more and found that 2.18 and
2.19 have a slightly different syntax for the function arguments:
Truly the fact that it’s difficult for power
y. Thanks again!
From: "Jan-Peter Voigt"
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2018 10:43 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Including tweaks in a variable
Hello Michael,
it works if you add \etc to the variable (in lily-dev 2.19.x IIRC):
smNote =
Hello Michael,
it works if you add \etc to the variable (in lily-dev 2.19.x IIRC):
smNote = \tweak font-size #-2 \etc
That way smNote becomes a music-function that takes the note as argument
and the tweak is applied.
If you are using 2.18 you have to create the function like this:
smNote = #(de
This should be simple, but I just can't seem to get it to work. I'm
working on re-doing a lot of our church music, and use variables
extensively to help make the .ly files more readable. There are a lot of
places where one vocal part splits and we want the "secondary" notes to be
smaller, resu
ob,
> and RIGHT should right-align the grob.
To quote from the original mail starting this thread:
Hi all,
In the snippet below, I want to tweak a dynamic grob created using
Shevek's dynText function
(cf. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-07/msg00043.html
Hi David,
> As long as you refuse to answer the question I have repeated
> at least 3 times by now, there is no implementable specification.
>
> You have again _completely_ failed to specify what you actually expect
> self-alignment-X to do over its range of values in the context of \dynText .
I
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> you still fail to specify _what_ you actually want.
>
> Sigh. I have specified exactly what I want. Several times. I'll do it
> again, in yet another wording, hoping you find this more clear:
I give up. As long as you refuse to answer the question I hav
Hi David,
> you still fail to specify _what_ you actually want.
Sigh. I have specified exactly what I want. Several times. I'll do it again, in
yet another wording, hoping you find this more clear:
1. I want a function which combines text and dynamics (as both \dynamic and
\dynText do).
2. I
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
> I have no idea how you actually call "seems to work",
>
> namely just _how_ you want self-alignment-X to get factored in,
>
> considering that the whole point of the dynText function is
> to figure out an alignment yielding a text-dependent reference p
Hello David (et al.),
> Using the edition-engraver, I'd like to set self-alignment-X = #RIGHT (which
> would allow the note spacing to normalize) and then use either X-offset or
> extra-offset to nudge the dynamic back to the right (to approximate the
> "proper" alignment). If I can do that, th
Hi David,
> I have no idea how you actually call "seems to work",
> namely just _how_ you want self-alignment-X to get factored in,
> considering that the whole point of the dynText function is
> to figure out an alignment yielding a text-dependent reference point.
Sorry I haven't been clear.
He
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David (et al.),
>
>>> Can \dynText or similar be fashioned in such a way that leaves open
>>> the possibility of [effectively] tweaking the grob later in the
>>> process?
>>
>> I repeat: If you want self-alignment-X to be heeded in there in some
>> manner, you need
Hi David (et al.),
>> Can \dynText or similar be fashioned in such a way that leaves open
>> the possibility of [effectively] tweaking the grob later in the
>> process?
>
> I repeat: If you want self-alignment-X to be heeded in there in some
> manner, you need to incorporate it in the callback fo
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> The tweak applies fine but self-alignment-X is consulted in the normal
>> callback for X-offset which has been replaced by a callback using the
>> formula (- 1 (/ width 2)) . If you want self-alignment-X to be heeded
>> in there in some manner, you need
Hi David,
> The tweak applies fine but self-alignment-X is consulted in the normal
> callback for X-offset which has been replaced by a callback using the
> formula (- 1 (/ width 2)) . If you want self-alignment-X to be heeded
> in there in some manner, you need to incorporate it in the callback
Kieren MacMillan writes:
>
> In the snippet below, I want to tweak a dynamic grob created using Shevek's
> dynText function (cf.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-07/msg00043.html). But
> unfortunately, tweaks don't seem to affect it.
>
>
Hi all,
In the snippet below, I want to tweak a dynamic grob created using Shevek's
dynText function (cf.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-07/msg00043.html). But
unfortunately, tweaks don't seem to affect it.
How can I change the function such that I can still ap
2016-01-02 23:37 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
>
> Please look at the attached png and test the attached code.
> Tell me what isn't sufficient.
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
>
Hi Harm,
I just found your solution to the problem I had been having for a long time
– it helped tremendously, thank you!
Only proble
Am 11.05.2017 um 01:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
>
> Change clefs can be recognised by the glyph name as well. You can try
> putting some sort of (display glyph-name) in the body of the
> let-expression (on the same level like the actual functionality) to find
> out more.
Ah of course. Thanks, Si
Am 10.05.2017 um 19:26 schrieb Noeck:
Am 10.05.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
of course you could write a callback:
Thanks Simon,
that's much better than my approach to replace the \clef command with a
\once \override or \tweak and \clef combination.
I'll figure out what the #\F means
Am 10.05.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> of course you could write a callback:
Thanks Simon,
that's much better than my approach to replace the \clef command with a
\once \override or \tweak and \clef combination.
I'll figure out what the #\F means but could someone tell me how I can
fin
. Sorry about that. I was going off of memory, but forgot that this
is how the pairs are actually utilized. Thanks, Simon, for a usable
solution.
Best,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ClefModifier-tweaks-conditional-on-clef-tp203018p203039.html
Am 09.05.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Joram,
does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
But can I affect the y position?
Ah! I look forward to seeing the answer.
It would be great (actually, kind of
Hi Joram,
> does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
> number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
> But can I affect the y position?
Ah! I look forward to seeing the answer.
It would be great (actually, kind of essential) if it did.
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
Hi,
does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
But can I affect the y position?
Best,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mail
Abraham,
> The ClefModifier grob has a property called "clef-alignments" that handles
> this, providing individual positioning for G, F, and C clefs (you'll likely
> need to play around with the numbers a bit):
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/clefmodifier
Oh, FFS… I cle
’d rather put it in a context modification, inside
> the stylesheet (where my clefs, fonts, etc. are set). Is there a nice
> global way to apply X-offset/Y-offset/extra-offset(/??) tweaks
> conditionally based on which clef is being used?
>
The ClefModifier grob has a property called &qu
position right now).
I know I could define a macro (e.g. “bassb”) which outputs a clef with the
modifier tweaked… but I’d rather put it in a context modification, inside the
stylesheet (where my clefs, fonts, etc. are set). Is there a nice global way to
apply X-offset/Y-offset/extra-offset(/??) tweaks
Thanks guys, that works.
---
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> Am 07.04.2017 um 00:15 schrieb David Kastrup:
>
>> masterTweak = \tweak something \tweak something-else \etc
>>
>
> To give some context: You actually need a music function for that p
Am 07.04.2017 um 00:15 schrieb David Kastrup:
masterTweak = \tweak something \tweak something-else \etc
To give some context: You actually need a music function for that
purpose. \etc is only an abbreviation to have the parser (?) construct
that music function for you.
Best, Simon
Knute Snortum writes:
> I seem to remember that there is now a way to put several tweaks into a
> variable. So instead of writing this:
>
> c4 -\tweak something -\tweak something-else c8
>
> I could write something like this:
>
> masterTweak = { \magic -
I seem to remember that there is now a way to put several tweaks into a
variable. So instead of writing this:
c4 -\tweak something -\tweak something-else c8
I could write something like this:
masterTweak = { \magic -\tweak something -\tweak something-else }
...
c4 -\masterTweak
David Kastrup writes:
> Don't do that. The acknowledger is the place for _setting_
> properties, and of course a first acknowledger has no chance to see
> properties set by a second acknowledger. Instead, use the
> acknowledger to _record_ the grobs. Then you use the
> process-acknowledged hoo
rks in
> https://github.com/openlilylib/scholarly/blob/master/annotate/engraver.ily#L66).
>
> The second one is the result of an implicit \tweak where it is fond in
> the 'tweaks property of the music expression.
>
> So, my question is: if I'm iterating over the grobs in an
of an implicit \tweak where it is fond in
the 'tweaks property of the music expression.
So, my question is: if I'm iterating over the grobs in an engraver's
acknowledger (as per the link above), how can I first determine if the
grob('s music) has a 'tweaks property and seco
2016-05-08 2:28 GMT+02:00 Sam Bivens :
> Hi all,
>
> Attached, I show my solutions for two figured bass tweaks: first, a
> parenthesized (not bracketed) figure; and second, a lone integer on the
> "lower line."
>
> The work-arounds are good enough for now, I&#
f \line
\new FiguredBass \figs
>>
}
Cheers,
Pierre
2016-05-08 2:28 GMT+02:00 Sam Bivens :
> Hi all,
>
> Attached, I show my solutions for two figured bass tweaks: first, a
> parenthesized (*not* bracketed) figure; and second, a lone integer on the
> "lower line.&
Hi all,
Attached, I show my solutions for two figured bass tweaks: first, a
parenthesized (/not/ bracketed) figure; and second, a lone integer on
the "lower line."
The work-arounds are good enough for now, I'm just curious if anyone has
any better ideas, or if I missed an o
ot actually powerful but just a shortcut for existing
functionality. In those cases where it fits the bill (and tweaks are
likely candidates), it's easier on the eyes than spelling out the music
function definition would be.
--
David Kastrup
___
l
Thomas Morley writes:
> Thus:
>
> \version "2.19.40"
>
> shared-tweaks =
> \tweak font-size #12 \etc
Which is the primordial justification for the \etc feature.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hi Thomas,
> \etc
AH!! I remember seeing that some time ago (in one of David K’s posts on another
topic), and thinking how great/powerful that probably was/is, but not really
understanding how to use it. Now I understand.
Thank you for the quick and helpful reply
And thank you to David K and w
27;1\tweaked-spanner 1\stopTextSpan
> }
>
> \score { \music }
> SNIPPET ENDS
>
> Now I want to have a number of different tweaked spanners which share a bunch
> of tweaks. But the intuitive (?) extension doesn’t work:
>
> SNIPPET BEGINS
> \version "2.19"
&
anners which share a bunch
of tweaks. But the intuitive (?) extension doesn’t work:
SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19"
shared-tweaks =
\tweak fontsize #12
tweaked-spanner =
\shared-tweaks
\tweak color #red
\startTextSpan
music = {
c''1\tweaked-spanner 1\stopTextSpan
2016-01-03 0:16 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> If you do it 'before-line-breaking it works, yes, but can't be changed
>> 'after-line-breaking anymore ...
>>
>> No idea what's happening and why.
>
> Caching? I don't see you using unpure-pure containers. Anything else
> is
Hi Harm,
> Let me ensure you, my table has some nice bite marks more …
=(
> All this predefining markups down/above/parenthesized is way too
> tedious and error-prone and would need to be done for
> double-ottavation as well ...
> And \raise will break whenever you want to use another \fontsize
Thomas Morley writes:
> If you do it 'before-line-breaking it works, yes, but can't be changed
> 'after-line-breaking anymore ...
>
> No idea what's happening and why.
Caching? I don't see you using unpure-pure containers. Anything else
is only evaluated once.
--
David Kastrup
_
.
2016-01-02 17:16 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Harm,
>
>> Just wrote a bug-report:
>> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Overriding-OttavaBracket-text-fails-td185451.html
>
> Thanks!
>
> Can you help me with the #'stencil-align-dir-y replacement hack?
>
> In the snippet (below), I’ve got
Hi Harm,
> Just wrote a bug-report:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Overriding-OttavaBracket-text-fails-td185451.html
Thanks!
Can you help me with the #'stencil-align-dir-y replacement hack?
In the snippet (below), I’ve got the basic 8va the way I want it, but can’t
seem to find the ri
2016-01-02 1:02 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Harm,
>
>> \alterBroken is a tool meant to facilitate addressing and tweaking
>> parts and properties of spanners. You may call it syntactic sugar ;)
>> It needs investigation why it fails with OttavaBracket.text
>
> And, my [admittedly non-exhausti
Hi Harm,
> In general, even a feature-request which is well-defined
> and short worded may involve a lot more then expected. ;)
For over twenty years, I was a programmer (of Java, a half-dozen other
languages, and several database scripting environments) with clients/users — so
I know that only
Hi Harm,
> \alterBroken is a tool meant to facilitate addressing and tweaking
> parts and properties of spanners. You may call it syntactic sugar ;)
> It needs investigation why it fails with OttavaBracket.text
And, my [admittedly non-exhaustive] testing has just shown,
OttavaBracket.shorten-pai
Hi David
> it's quite trivial to complete the "well-defined” task
> without doing anything remotely useful.
Well, at least I’ve answered the charge that I didn’t give a well-defined task.
Cheers,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.
2016-01-01 22:13 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi David,
>
>> To me it would appear that in this case by far the lion's share of the
>> work is digging through reference books (incidentally, I don't have any
>> of those),
Don't have any as well
>> devising a good plan for the desired behavior, c
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2016-01-01 22:30 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>> Kieren MacMillan writes:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>
>> It is trivial to let OttavaBracket contain line-spanner-interface which
>> is just a label for a set of properties. What those properties do
>> depends on actual code, however.
2016-01-01 22:30 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Kieren MacMillan writes:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> To me it would appear that in this case by far the lion's share of the
>>> work is digging through reference books (incidentally, I don't have any
>>> of those), devising a good plan for the desired behavio
may call it syntactic sugar ;)
It needs investigation why it fails with OttavaBracket.text
Nevertheless, the basic route of my coding is covered by
Extending 2.8 Difficult tweaks
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending-big-page#difficult-tweaks
and it works.
Cheers,
Harm
___
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> To me it would appear that in this case by far the lion's share of the
>> work is digging through reference books (incidentally, I don't have any
>> of those), devising a good plan for the desired behavior, checking with
>> the current behavior, figuring
Hi Harm,
> broken text isn't that hard
Thanks!
Through a combination of \translate, \with-dimensions, #’before- and
#’after-line-breaking, and your help, I'm getting close to recreating without
line-spanner-interface the OttavaBracket defaults that I had before [by
overriding #’stencil]; see
Hi David N,
> Strange that
> \alterBroken text #'(() "") Staff.OttavaBracket
> doesn't have an effect here (substitute this line for the call of \foo above).
Exactly. This discovery (which I made some days ago) further added to my
frustration about not being able to predict what is or is not lik
Hi Harm,
> I posted my findings, else I wrote "discussable ..."
>
> So, let's start discussion.
>
> In the end the general question "How should OttavaBracket behave?"
> should be answered detailed.
> Part of it:
> Which properties should be user-settable?
> How should a (maybe broken) OttavaBrac
Hi David,
> To me it would appear that in this case by far the lion's share of the
> work is digging through reference books (incidentally, I don't have any
> of those), devising a good plan for the desired behavior, checking with
> the current behavior, figuring out where the differences are,
> c
Hi David,
> "particular" is not the same as "well-defined”.
> I can't even figure out what this is supposed to be about.
Feature Request: OttavaBracket should support line-spanner-interface.
Does that satisfy your definition of "well-defined”?
Thanks,
Kieren.
K
Thomas Morley writes:
> True.
> I posted my findings, else I wrote "discussable ..."
>
> So, let's start discussion.
>
> In the end the general question "How should OttavaBracket behave?"
> should be answered detailed.
> Part of it:
> Which properties should be user-settable?
> How should a (mayb
2016-01-01 19:23 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Kieren MacMillan writes:
>
>> Hi Harm,
>>
>> Thank you so much for doing all this! Very informative and helpful.
>>
>>> I made some fundamental research about spanners with line-interface
>>> and those with additional line-spanner-interface.
>>> Code, p
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi Harm,
>
> Thank you so much for doing all this! Very informative and helpful.
>
>> I made some fundamental research about spanners with line-interface
>> and those with additional line-spanner-interface.
>> Code, pdf, log attached. Their behaviour is inconsistent, to
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2016-01-01 17:38 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan >:
> >
> > And my limited testing with \alterBroken seems to suggest that not all
> bits are user-settable (e.g., I still can’t seem to set the broken text
> without overriding the stencil).
>
> W
2016-01-01 17:38 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan :
>> P.S.: Up to now I found it impossible to override certain properties
>> of the first part of a broken OttavaBracket, like the length of the line.
>> Hairpin has the 'broken-bound-padding at least, but none of the
>> others, if I'm not mistaken.
>
>
Hi Harm,
Thank you so much for doing all this! Very informative and helpful.
> I made some fundamental research about spanners with line-interface
> and those with additional line-spanner-interface.
> Code, pdf, log attached. Their behaviour is inconsistent, to say the least.
=(
> Regarding def
2015-12-31 3:23 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Harm,
>
> Now that my custom ottavation function isn’t overriding the stencil, how do I
> adjust all of the parameters I had set in the “bound-details” version (e.g.,
> X, Y, padding, right-broken.X, etc.)?
>
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
>
> p.s. My origin
Hi Harm,
Now that my custom ottavation function isn’t overriding the stencil, how do I
adjust all of the parameters I had set in the “bound-details” version (e.g., X,
Y, padding, right-broken.X, etc.)?
Thanks,
Kieren.
p.s. My original function was simply extended from the example in the [curre
Hi Harm,
> I don't think OttavaBracket.bound-details does anything, I'd delete it.
It doesn’t any more, because the stencil is no longer being overridden:
SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19.32"
\paper { ragged-right = ##f }
#(define eightva
#{
\markup
%% messing around with \with-dim
of text and line [where
> Lilypond’s default does not];
> 2. It places the beginning and end of the OttavaBracket [and text]
> exactly where I want it (personal preference); and,
> 3. It allows me to apply \overrides and \tweaks post-hoc (e.g., using the
> edition-engraver
2015-12-30 15:53 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> But the following works
>>
>> #(define eightva
>> #{
>> \markup
>> %% messing around with \with-dimensions, because OttavaBracket has no
>> %% possibility to set details.stencil-align-dir-y
>> %% :((
>>
Thomas Morley writes:
> But the following works
>
> #(define eightva
> #{
> \markup
> %% messing around with \with-dimensions, because OttavaBracket has no
> %% possibility to set details.stencil-align-dir-y
> %% :((
> \with-dimensions #'(0 . 4) #'(0 . 2.8)
> \
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
