Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes: > Hi David, > >> you still fail to specify _what_ you actually want. > > Sigh. I have specified exactly what I want. Several times. I'll do it > again, in yet another wording, hoping you find this more clear:
I give up. As long as you refuse to answer the question I have repeated at least 3 times by now, there is no implementable specification. You have again _completely_ failed to specify what you actually expect self-alignment-X to do over its range of values in the context of \dynText . > (Note that I have intentionally left out the post-hoc "tweak using the > edition-engraver" portion of my process, since that part seems to be > confusing you.) Rather I suspect that it excites you to a degree where you again and again and again forget what I am asking. It's irrelevant to the issue at hand. >> Without such a specification, there will be no code doing what you >> want because you just leave far too much in the open. > > It seems pretty cut and dried to me. What is unclear about the 2-point > specification I gave, above? It doesn't specify what the different possible values of self-alignment-X are supposed to do, and your request was that self-alignment-X was to be heeded. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
