Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes: > Hi David (et al.), > >>> Can \dynText or similar be fashioned in such a way that leaves open >>> the possibility of [effectively] tweaking the grob later in the >>> process? >> >> I repeat: If you want self-alignment-X to be heeded in there in some >> manner, you need to incorporate it in the callback for the offset. > > I do appreciate the "teach a man to fish" approach… > > I've poked around at the \dynText function, and the \dynamic function > in OpenLilyLib (see snippet, below, for original version), but have > been as yet unable to incorporate self-alignment-X into the > callback(s) for the offset in a way that seems to work.
I don't see what you tried. And I have no idea how you actually call "seems to work", namely just _how_ you want self-alignment-X to get factored in, considering that the whole point of the dynText function is to figure out an alignment yielding a text-dependent reference point. So maybe you should say just what values of self-alignment-X you want to lead to what alignment points when given a text like "somewhat f". So far I have seen nothing in the way of spelling out what you actually _want_. Well, you want a dial to fiddle with, but just what values should lead to what results without losing the whole point of dynText's calculation is nothing you bothered to specify. And of course that is something you need to figure out before even starting to "poke around". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
