Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes: > Hi Harm, > > Thank you so much for doing all this! Very informative and helpful. > >> I made some fundamental research about spanners with line-interface >> and those with additional line-spanner-interface. >> Code, pdf, log attached. Their behaviour is inconsistent, to say the least. > > =( > >> Regarding default OttavaBracket: >> It doesn't have line-spanner-interface […] >> It is discussable whether OttavaBracket should behave more like other >> spanners with line-spanner-interface. I guess the main reason why >> OttavaBracket is done as it is, was to have edge-height and >> bracket-flare user-settable. >> Though, this may be possible even if the stencil-procedure would >> listen to the properties from line-spanner-interface. >> >> This would mean to rewrite the stencil, ofcourse. C++ work, which I >> can't do myself. > > David K: Here, I believe, is a perfect example of a well-defined task > that I would be happy to sponsor.
"particular" is not the same as "well-defined". I can't even figure out what this is supposed to be about. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
