chful eyes.
Basically, it boils down to organization of ebuilds and how they are
being watched. A group that watches all isn't a good idea to me, my idea
above makes more sense.
Anyways, I've been trying to keep quiet on this issue and decided I
could interject here :)
Cheers-
--
#x27;t make a system that's easily DoS'able. If anyone wants to
help out with that, please contact KingTaco as he's the contact for that
project right now.
Patience is indeed a virtue.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Publi
an update to the bug every
week until it gets completed. My guess (sparing any huge hurdles), is
that we can have the new bugs up by the end of this month. That's
including setting up the software, and testing it to make sure that the
issues that's been occurring have been addressed.
Che
r help? I think you
know how I'm feeling now then. I fail to see how the constant nagging
helps the situation. The logic escapes me. There are more constructive
ways of finding out the status of a problem/solution.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Opera
recruiters *cough*swift*cough* could work faster ;-) )
Anyways, I'm not going to rant on about this anymore. We're working on
the problem, and you just have to be patient.
Cheers-
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public K
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:51:55 -0500 Lance Albertson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | There are more constructive ways of finding out the status of a
> | problem/solution.
>
> Actually, with that in mind I think the council could be of help here...
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/08/06, Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You have no concept of where the bottle neck is. The webserver hosting
>> the cgi part isn't being loaded hardly at all. The database server is a
>> pretty beefy box,
pen on the
> slave and writes on the master. However you would need to change most of
> the queries to point to the slave server which is usually not trivial.
> It sounds like this is the path the Infra team is pursuing.
1++
You got it right :-)
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
tioned the table locking issues at some point
somewhere. I haven't looked at the bug, so you can prove me wrong. I
thought we had explained those issues somewhere (maybe -core?).
But yeah, I totally agree.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manag
titled to it. That's just how I view it when I read it. Its a bit
vague on what Gentoo really is. Is it talking only about the meta
distribution? Or that plus the underlying supporting systems that help
run Gentoo?
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operati
ctly say at this point ?
>
> Install only xlib ?
> Install xlib and some further ones ? Which ones ?
> Install all libs ?
Opening an ebuild and reading it must be hard.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>
>
>>> And what does this flag exactly say at this point ?
>>>
>>> Install only xlib ?
>>> Install xlib and some further ones ? Which ones ?
>>> Inst
if we can't deal with
each other in a semi-professional manner. It seems like mini-flame
explosions on irc/email have happened more frequently in the last few
months. This is just going to make the group implode if nothing is done
about it.
Anyways, that's my thoughts.
--
Lance Al
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
>> Frankly, the attitude of a lot devs lately towards infra
>> have made many of us not want to communicate what we're doing. If we're
>
> I can understand that, partly. But that won't help anyone. Assuming
&g
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
>> I generally try to do that, but after the 10th time the person doesn't
>> respect you and demands things from you, its kind of hard to keep that
>> mentality.
>
> Well, one out of >300. Simply do it for someone
kind of fork happens
where the folks who think we need a leader go their way and the folks
who prefer the leader-by-committee approach go their way. We all hate
forks, none of us have time for forks, but looking at the dividing line,
I don't see how we'll be able to compromise with out adding
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:42:48 -0500 Lance Albertson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I'm afraid those days are in the past unless some kind of fork happens
> | where the folks who think we need a leader go their way and the folks
> | who pref
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:11:52 -0500 Lance Albertson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I partially agree that a strong council will help the situation, but
> | the problem with any leadership-by-committee model is the lack of
> | quick decisions. Many
ing it.
Anyways, I'm not going to take any more flame bait since I'm sick and
tired of this shit.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A
Homer Parker wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 13:14 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
>> For the record, I was waiting for those folks to come to us to resolve
>> it. Last I knew we had a partial resolution with the parties involved,
>> but shortly after that they just stopped pur
at it doesn't happen again. So aside from the
perceived outcome, we did fix a few issues that we had with that.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544
policies you come up with, they mean absolutely nothing if you can't
actively deal with the consequences.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A
of us opting for filing a compliant rather than work with
the person individually first.
> You can always revert the mask also; most developers have cvs commit
> access (I know you do).
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public K
or send em an email with your thoughts on how hosting might work so we
can start planning that?
Thanks-
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282
this project's future)
Except that where do you host those first few releases? I'm pretty sure
we can stick them in experimental, but for the long run infra should be
in communication with this group so that we can make an effective plan
on hosting.
Thanks-
--
Lance Albertson <[EMA
x27;re ready' is done.
Its kind of a 'peer' review type of thing and it also builds
trust/communication between all of us.
This whole issue boils down to accountability and communication. We want
to make sure that We (gentoo) as a whole can be accountable for a
project that is cre
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>> From my point of view, it would have been nice to have at least been
>> asked what infra could do to host these tarballs down the road. That
>> way, we have a sound plan of doing a good release when they're ready. I
&
oo is much less personal now than it was
> "back in the day", but it does, at least, make things look less
> malicious.
I often wondered if people's filters would muck away such retirement
bugs sometimes. Perhaps devrel might send personal emails along side bug
emails
y and is expected to only take an hour.
Sorry about the issues this may cause!
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4
put changes" crap. I can't believe what I
read on here...
People, this whole thread is silly and a disgrace to our user base to
even read. I'm half tempted to submit iggy's vote-devs-off-the-island
GLEP :P (Thanks SpankY for reminding me about that).
Cheers-
--
Lance Albert
t forwarding. Cox (rhyme it as you will), my cable provider,
> doesn't allow 25 to leave their network. To send mail, I *have* to relay
> through their mail servers.
Then use port 587 like I do and it works perfectly fine. I have Cox and
don't have any problems sending gentoo mail th
can get around that, but as you've seen Kurt/Andrea have already made up
their mind. I let them deal with the mail system so they have a say on
that for now.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.ne
e a hard time wanting to help them. I can't
control what Kurt does/says so that's out of my control. I didn't
exactly like his response either but he wanted to take care of mail so
that's what he's doing. Respect around here lately has been at an all
time low and I'm g
ou all when we make the switch.
In the meantime, if you notice list mail being slow, you'll know why.
Sorry about the inconvenience!
Thanks-
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Lance Albertson wrote:
> We've been having some hardware issues with the machine that runs
> lists.g.o in the last week or so. Unfortunately, lcars (the person who
> manages it) is going out of town this weekend and won't be able to
> troubleshoot it while he's gone. T
PST
or 2200 UTC today. Unless something comes up, plan for about an hour
downtime for that today.
Thanks-
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB
Lance Albertson wrote:
> We're going to be finally moving the last two machines at the OSL to the
> new datacenter later this afternoon. The scheduled time will be 2pm PST
> or 2200 UTC today. Unless something comes up, plan for about an hour
> downtime for that today.
Bot
this, but we'll just have to deal with it. Lets
hope this is all we need to do for tonight.
Cheers-
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 128
Lance Albertson wrote:
> I'm really sorry about this, but we'll just have to deal with it. Lets
> hope this is all we need to do for tonight.
So when the shit hits the fan, it *really* hits the fan...
As of now, we still have both machines down. Lark is apparently having
some
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 09:36:51AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
>> So when the shit hits the fan, it *really* hits the fan...
>
> Ok folks, both machines are back!
>
> You can resume your commits.
>
> Many thanks to:
> nnewton [of
;ve been working the
past few days on it and am getting close.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
ramereth/irc
ly on Pylon to help with this. So
please just be patient and we'll get this rolling soon. Bugging me or
other people about will not get you anywhere :P
We'll let you all know when its been implemented and ready for
consumption.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastruct
lematic, ping me, I don't
> mind hosting another few bits on gentooexperimental.org
Its just copyright issues that I'm sure we could work around. Besides,
you can't even handle a little /.'ing ;)
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations
s a bad thing
(tm).
Once again, I'm sorry it hasn't been working for the past few months, but
hopefully that will start to change soon. I will send out an email when its
back!
Cheers,
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operational Manager
---
7;t in package.mask.
I just fear if we continue to push these changes on the current 2.0.x
line will continue to piss off a lot of people.
Cheers,
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
Public GPG key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.
ted by the time they move to the next stable release. Asking people
to suddenly change midway through is a major pain. If they knew that these kinds
of changes were going to happen in >2.0.x, then it would be easier for them to
manage.
Cheers,
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ge
Christian Parpart wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 2:14 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>>Christian Parpart wrote:
>>
>>>And yeah, I disagree to a move-back, too!! I'm most likely not to support
>>>this in any kind, instead, I'd be willing in pushi
gt; have done up until now. A user can either run logrotate or not. This
> isn't about turning on a feature, it's about saving 4k. I don't think
> it's worth it; I feel like USE flags are getting completely out of
> control.
Not everyone uses logrotate (its optional i
(Stephen
>>| Bennett).
>>
>>N! What have you done? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE? THE EARTH IS DMED, I
>>SAY! DMED!
>
>
> mwuahahahahahah.
Just remember, I still own you ;-)
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infr
,
so we don't currently have a need for it from that side of things.
I'll report back when I find out whats going on!
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerpri
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 12:04 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
> > I was actually just thinking about WOLK today and how I never got around
> > to putting the newest builds in the tree. For now keep them in there.
> > I'll email upstream to see if whats
support it. Gentoo needs a profile for
> | a LSB-compliant system.
>
> Don't be silly.
Actually, he does have a point. I know a lot of folks gripe that linux doesn't
have any standard FS layout of where files are etc. If something like this could
be implemented, it would make tho
ge and revert the RESTRICT ... i just do it when i
> happen to notice it updating old ebuilds
We could make a couple of bugs for each category and get those folks to fixing
them. But then that would require a lot of work and I know we're all just a
bunch of lazy bums anyways ;)
Corey Shields wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:06 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>>We could make a couple of bugs for each category and get those folks to
>>fixing them. But then that would require a lot of work and I know we're all
>>just a bunch of lazy bums any
out we leave it a bit more open for interpretation?
Yeah, thanks for not putting those on our mirrors :) See my previous
email about a possible way to determine what goes on the mirrors. Maybe
we have a limit at which those devs should ask our mirror admins if the
file can be added or not (say, anyt
elves, etc). Also thank
blackace for getting it back up!
[1] http://archives.gentoo.org/ml/gentoo-trustees/
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:54 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lance Albertson wrote:
> > Just thought I'd mention that the archives [1] are back up for the
> > trustee mailing list. Its still being worked on, but most
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 18:38 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:54 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Lance Albertson wrote:
> > > Just thought I'd mention that the archives [1]
an Fransisco the end of this
> > month?
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
Public GPG key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
ramereth/irc.freenode.net
to have used the wrong tree (a bit outdated CVS instead
> livetree, sorry). Here is a new list which still consists of 161 items
> and should be uptodate:
Probably best to make a bug to track this instead of tracking it on a
ML :)
Cheers,
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infr
icial MySQL AB binaries.
Great work! I used his 4.1.11 ebuild recently and everything seems to work
pretty well. I'll see if I can try the 4.1.12 ebuild soon. Upgrades within the
4.1.x series shouldn't be painful right?
Cheers,
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gent
gt; rather than simply doing it.
>
> Infra -- this is about three megs of static content. I very much doubt
> that this will cause any noticeable disc or bandwidth load.
I have no problem with this being on your dev space. Great job!
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gento
yically delete the binary package and recreate it for the
category to be fixed. Sadly, I haven't had time to search for a bug on
it.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key f
le. They've shown a good userbase
that likes how it works and the tools with it. I for see something
simliar happening to an enterprise sub-project (or whatever you'd call
it). Heck, maybe this idea would be better fit as a fork, who knows.
Would be neat to have a group of people working
roviding tools, etc for folks in the enterprise.
Let the people who want to use Gentoo as a 'hobbist' distro use it like
that, and let the people that want to use it in the enterprise use it as
that.
Btw, I'm hoping to get this said sub-project going once I get settled in
with my m
gt; to get new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
> >
> > last chance !
>
> and it's done
NOooo1!!!!!!!
;-)
Thanks for working on that upgrade!
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: &
ably be to post a thread on this mailing
list to get more exposure. Of course, you could include your nickname
for IRC, but this or the forums would be a great place to get 'noticed'
per say if it really would be something to add to Gentoo.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
somewhere. (Just may
not be easily searchable)
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
ramereth/irc.freenode.net
sig
I
> don't recall any negative points being raised.
A new-ebuilds alias was created on toucan few months back. I guess word
never got out (or seemant never setup the account on bugzilla). Perhaps
it would be better just to reassign bugs to that account instead of
making another resolution.
w-ebuilds probably wouldn't fit this as well. If seemant is up for it,
we could just use something like need-maintainers or something simliar
to that name? If we did that, would we still need the resolution?
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
e spoken up
to suggest we keep the polls open longer than a week considering the
amount of material we needed to go through, but I didn't get a chance
between things. That's my fault for not addressing that concern.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructur
s like the two should fit together fine. Let me find
seemant and see what he thinks since he's kind of in charge of
bug-wrangler stuff.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fi
ver to run it on?
>
> I've asked that myself every now and then. aliz seems lost..
> Guess we/I should recode it.
I have no problem hosting this on our servers officially somewhere, just
need to find the code or rewrite it as you said.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
G
f Freenode will be affected too, so
complaining on IRC won't do much for ya ;).
There will be another outage for a similar amount of time at 0900UTC on
July 3. I will send out an announcement in a few days as a reminder for
that.
Ok, hopefully I didn't forget any services, enjoy!
e the need for having an alias for email contact. If they want to do
more than moderate, thats their will and can take the ebuild quiz for
that or can discuss that with recruiters.
Cheers,
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 17:34 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 00:20 +0200, Christian Hartmann wrote:
>
> > To host patches, docs etc. Just like every other devs/staff guy does
> > atm. (Sure. toucan isn't meant to be a download server and we&#x
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 03:32 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
> * Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/06/28 18:14 -0500]:
> > I'm just getting ansty about all these new people we're bringing
>
> "New people"? You're joking, aren't you? Some of th
>> Wolfgang Illmeyer wrote:[Thu Jun 30 2005, 12:40:21PM EDT]
>>
>>
>>> Calculating dependencies -
>>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-uitl/kdevelop".
I thought we fixed this problem.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
when the security contact is
>> unreachable).
>>2. This information will be held on the Dev Wiki.
>
>
> wtf is the Dev Wiki ? what's wrong with metadata.xml ?
Yeah, having it in metadata.xml would make more sense.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo In
re and it will be seen rather
than spamming the list.
Cheers,
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey all,
All our servers located at IU (which includes a few rsync servers and
toucan) will have a network outage of approximately one hour tomorrow
(Aug 4) between 0600-0700 CDT (1100-1200 UTC). Hopefully all goes well
and we don't notice them gone that long.
Cheers,
--
Lance Albe
with Gentoo on
archiving its goals.
It would be nice to come up with a solution without forking, but I just
don't see how it'd be possible and keep things as they should in an
enterprise realm. Things are starting to settle down for me again and I
would like to jumpstart this project again.
min, not a coder so I'll got back to my cave. ;)
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
ramereth/irc.free
27;t host this for you? We have a mysql
database at the OSL we can use and a box to host it on if you need it.
Just let me/us know.
> I will be posting the messages to this malinglis once a day as before.
>
> If you have any comments or suggestions please mail me.
--
Lance Alber
erver'
based profile we have. Granted, if you don't want the extra goodies you
get with a hardened system, that is an issue, but this is one option we
have. I look at their profile as a great model for the server end of things.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
they should ;-). I have seen more and more 'newish' devs speaking their
minds like this without even knowing/asking the person. I guess respect
and tactfulness isn't being taught anymore...
And yes, Grant definitely knows the difference :-)
Cheers,
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTE
7;t want to
end up supporting every framework out there just because its cool. If
you're using something other than what we're currently using, I would
like to see justification for using it beyond "its a call framework".
Anyways, we have the space open for it, just haven't
e limits of what we were elected for (we
> won't replace project leads or devrel).
The actual powers/role of devrel has always been a grey area. Perhaps it
is time that the Council formalize their position so people know exactly
what they can/can't do.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PRO
Jon Portnoy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:33:59AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>>The actual powers/role of devrel has always been a grey area.
>
>
> No it hasn't, unless by 'gray area' you mean 'a few people who don't
> like devrel
olving developer issues.
If QA has done all it can to help improve someone or deal with their
problems, then devrel can take over it. Give the power to the right
people so they can do the right kind of work and decisions.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operation
've always made sure any permanent removals
go through devrel first.
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
---
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Tentative Agenda for Thursday's meeting :
> If I forgot anything (that was put on the agenda by 1900 UTC yesterday)
> please let me know.
Where are we meeting again? :) Same place as before?
--
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrast
tation until GLEP 23 is implemented, or
something that will complement it? Whats going to happen to this data
after GLEP23 gets implemented? I'd hate to see something added simply
because its a quick one-off solution to make something work. I'd rather
see people focus on the actual GLEP
or who ever) does the posting at both places.
> I'm going to say as much on our ML reform "list" and add you to the CC.
Is lcars on this "list" ? If not, I really think he should be since he's
the current maintainer of the mailing lists and knows the
limitations/cap
gt; bother to check them. If we were to change that, I'm sure users would
> eventually pick up on the fact.
I would agree with Chris here too. As long as we start using this
channel more and we get the word out, folks will start to be more
attentive to it. We can't satisfy every
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:40 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>>>Well, I think that if users knew that information would be on these
>>>places, they might actually check them. Currently, little to no
>>>information ever makes it to either o
101 - 196 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
