Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:51:55 -0500 Lance Albertson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | There are more constructive ways of finding out the status of a
> | problem/solution.
> 
> Actually, with that in mind I think the council could be of help here...
> The bugs slowdown *is* a serious problem, and Jakub's failing miserably
> at getting it addressed properly. Perhaps the council could suggest a
> more reasonable way of handling things -- for example, how about
> requesting that certain projects (ones that are important but not
> providing what developers or users would like) deliver status reports
> to each meeting? That would satisfy the requests for information, and
> it would spare infra from the constant puerile whining they're
> receiving...
> 

I don't see a problem with doing something like that if its within
reason. I know this has made infra look terrible with how long its been
drawn out. Its been a failure on many different levels in the chain. I
admit that I'm not happy about it either and feel rather embarrassed
about it.

I was planning on eventually sending an email asking the devs what they
want so we (infra) have a better idea. Sometimes its hard to get a feel
for what developers need without them directly contacting us. Anyways,
thats for another time (hopefully soon).

-- 
Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
GPG Public Key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to