Grant Goodyear wrote: > Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 04:29:45PM CDT] > >>>I'm not quite sure what you're adding. GLEP 15 was approved quite some >>>time ago. "All" that remains is to finish up the implementation. >> >>or rather move it from gentooexperimental.org to "official" gentoo >>infrastructure (?) > > > Ah, I see. To the best of my knowledge that just needs to be worked out > w/ the GLEP 15 people and infra. I dropped into -infra and they said > that there's space for it, but that bug # 98282 lists a couple of > contentious points. (Also, the gentooexperimental scripts "about" page > seems to suggest that their framework differs from the "official" > version.)
A correction, the bug# is 98272. This is correct. Last I knew port001 was working on a python based version of this. If this has changed, we need to know about. Also, before people go developing a new site that may potentially become an official site, I would like to require them to submit an implementation plan to the infra team via a bug or some other method. I don't want to end up supporting every framework out there just because its cool. If you're using something other than what we're currently using, I would like to see justification for using it beyond "its a call framework". Anyways, we have the space open for it, just haven't heard from port001 in a while about it. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature