Thierry Carrez wrote: > Nathan L. Adams wrote: > >>Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> >>>>right ... once a GLEP has been hammered out and approved, there isnt really >>>>anything left for managers/council to do ... it's then up to whoever to get >>>>it done ;) >> >>They *could* do some 'creative re-org' a.k.a. remove some folks from >>their current roles if they are willfully breaking the rules... > > > This is the role of devrel enforcement arm. The complaint / > investigation / judgement / appeal process is already defined. The > council enters the stage only at the appeals step to limit abuse of > power situations (and of course to define what policy really is). > > I for one am committed to help in enforcement of any policy that has > been decided, but only in the limits of what we were elected for (we > won't replace project leads or devrel).
The actual powers/role of devrel has always been a grey area. Perhaps it is time that the Council formalize their position so people know exactly what they can/can't do. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
