Mike Frysinger wrote: >>It certainly says they're responsible for adding and removing >>developers, but I don't see anything about them being solely responsible >>for revoking access. > > > no, nowhere does it say 'devrel is the only team which may revoke access', > but > it is the only team which says they can and i'd prefer it stay that way > -mike
I would like there to be a clause that infra has the ability to at least temporarily revoke access to have the ability to protect our servers if something came up quickly. I've always made sure any permanent removals go through devrel first. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
