Grant Goodyear wrote: > With all due respect, I disagree. My recollection was that the SPF > discussion was held well over a year ago, on a list that isn't archived, > so the rationale for using SPF isn't available for many of the devs who > have started raising questions about it. Kurt's reply to those devs was > not particularly helpful. (My suspicion is that Kurt figures that he's > been through all of these arguments before, and doesn't want to rehash > them yet again, but that misses the fact that many of our current devs > not only weren't part of that earlier discussion, but they have no > access to it, either.) Your reply was very helpful, but between Kurt's > closing of the bug and your response on -dev it appeared that infra was > essentially saying "We know best, we're not changing how we do things, > and we don't want to talk about it". If that appearance were, in fact, > the reality, then appealing to the Council would seem to be perfectly > reasonable.
I'm sorry, but when people automatically want to go to the council first and ask questions later I have a hard time wanting to help them. I can't control what Kurt does/says so that's out of my control. I didn't exactly like his response either but he wanted to take care of mail so that's what he's doing. Respect around here lately has been at an all time low and I'm getting sick and tired of it. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
